Cutting homework or senior year, will make the education process harder for most students who learn at a slower pace. The four articles we read in class gave us all different viewings to how and why it’s important for people to have in their life. In Frederick Douglas and Malcolm X, they wrote about how they didn’t get the same opportunities as other to get educated because they were a different race, however, both of them took the time to self educate themselves and were successful. Education and literacy have been the two most important parts of people 's lives. In today’s society, everyone gets the same opportunities as each other when it comes to
The schools that have no homework have a better boat. In other words, schools with no homework do not have better test scores. In the article “20 Pros and Cons of Homework.” on Vittana.org the author explains how how homework only creates negative attitudes towards schools; “Survey after survey has found that the only thing that homework does is create a negative attitude toward schooling and education in general.” Students receive a great deal of homework each night but yet all it does is create a negative attitude towards school. If homework was eliminated then students might have a more positive attitude towards school. This would cause students to perform better academically since they think of school in positive ways and want to excelle.
Later school starts have also been associated with less depression and anxiety. And according to the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, starting later, “aid peak alertness and performance while supporting better mental health and student safety.” It seems as though there’s only benefits to changing school start times. Maybe that’s why according to debate.org, 79% of people surveyed agree with start times being later. However, changing something so concrete is difficult because of busses, and sports with their practices, and also job shift times. This can all be changed with more funding for busses.
The goal of the usage of this fact is to show readers this common term does not reflect real traits of smart people and can be treated as an insult because of that. It is one of the few examples of Fridman’s appeals to readers’ logic. The essay is based on general data; the author mentioned schools and universities promote negative attitude to smart students: “Nerds are ostracized while athletes are idolized” (Fridman). But he did not use any statistical or science data to support his position. For example, Fridman could provide data about scholarships and other types of funding for sports and other activities.
The anti-homework side also appears to be gaining numbers among students and teachers across the country. Searches have stated that homework is more harmful than helpful. It causes stress, sleepless nights, and many other actual health effects. There has also been little agreement over the actual pros and cons of schools assigning homework. Some studies have shown that homework can help a student get better grades, while others have shown that it has no correlation to academic success.
America has come a long way in its education system. It is easier now, more than ever, for people of any race or gender to get an education. However, it is arguable that the educational system does not do its job to prepare students to become successful young adults. There are many flaws in the order of education, which causes students to worry more about satisfying others with test scores and academics rather than actually preparing them for the real world. While the educational system does prepare students for the academic stress of college, it does not qualify students to become young, successful adults and survive in the real world.
There have been studies that have proven that students who do homework do better in school do better than the children that do not do their homework. “Beyond achievement, homework can also lead to the development of good study habits and a recognition that learning can occur at home as well as at school. “Homework can also foster independent learning and responsible character traits – essential skills later in life when students change jobs or learn new skills for advancement at work”(Harrison
After receiving the marks, the exam found that 52% of the students had chosen Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan or Fascist Italy as our allies during World War II instead of the Soviet Union. This type of mistake is inexcusable! The internet allows children to have an open ended gate to miraculous knowledge. The internet poses as sensational tool that carries large amounts of information but it seems that our young adults have chosen not to take such a valued advantage. Instead, they spend their time on the computer working towards another downfall to their success.
Optimal school start times will lead to more sleep, attentiveness, cognitive thinking, and overall a better mood and a more positive outlook on school. All these improvements that would allegedly happen are the exact opposite results caused by the school start times now. Students who go to school in the afternoon are proven to do better overall compared to someone who starts in the morning. One of the positive outcomes of early school start times is that early start results in early dismissal which gives the students more free time for activities and other things that go on in a student's life. Optimal school start time will lead to less free time for homework, sports, and other related activities which take can take a lot of time for many students.
Mark Bauerlein’s book The Dumbest Generation showcases this very ideal. However, technology actually helps us as it exercises, enhances, and challenges our minds. Because of technology, people under the age of thirty are not the dumbest generation, but instead have a different way to gain knowledge. Notably, the effects of technology on youth have been debated over for several years. Some believe that there are very harmful effects.
Not only this, but problems can arise in older children with behavioral therapy. Therapies tend to work better among younger children – truly the earlier it can be caught, the better, because "The sooner the child can start the better and if you wait too long it 's much harder to have the good changes that we 've seen" (“Autism Therapy”). Another popular therapy is sensory enrichment therapy. Sensory enrichment uses different sensory experiences to allow the brain to reduce
But test prep is only part of the picture, with much of the test-score differential originating far before any student even thinks about standardized testing. From the beginning, Biamonte (2013) explains, students from higher-income families have more opportunities: they attend better, higher-funded schools with more rigorous curriculums, AP classes, and dual credit, all of which impact standardized test performance. Consequently, higher-income students have an advantage over their lower-income
Jonathan Zimmerman is saying that while many people believe as technology evolves and advances that it will make education better and better. Students claim there is nothing wrong with being on social media while doing school work is not detrimental to their education but instead claim they are simply, "mutitasking". Students now believe that everything in education can be done easier and more efficient through using their computers and cellular devices. But when it comes down to the facts, studies that have been conducted over and over again have shown that those who claim to be "mutitaskers" preform worse than the average person in just about every skill tested. Other studies show that just by reading something off a computer screen or a phone screen causes you to retain and comprehend less of what you are reading.
Unfortunately, I cannot recall the name of the male author, but I can recall his message with certainty. He argued that technology hampers the learning process, which, in turn, means that millenials are dumber than prior generations. As part of his lengthy argument, he cites a study that piqued my interested as an undergraduate college student. During a typical college lecture, students who take their notes using their expensive, fancy computers actually retain less knowledge than students who opt for the traiditonal pen-and-paper way of taking notes. This occurs because the latter students must find ways to condense and shorten the facts and concepts presented - the time it takes for them to write just cannot engrave every single word uttered by their professor.
In my opinion, Flint Hill has the better educational approach with regards to technology. I believe this because the school 's’ administration allows students to experiment with technology. By shielding children from modern technology, you are limiting their potential and creating more obstacles for them to overcome in the near future. Furthermore, by exposing kids to technology, students are more eager to learn and are often more interested because they are learning in a form they think is entertaining. Students who sit uncomfortably in desks and listen to rambling lectures are most likely not able to retain information as well, due to the lack of engagement.