1. The Net Generation is known to be “digital natives” because they are the first generation to grow up in a world based around technology. However, there are debates about how technology skills in NetGen effect information literacy compared to past generations. One side of the debate claims that new approaches to learning and teaching should be invented to keep up with the changes in technology. It has been proven due to research with rats, that our brain is constantly changing from the time we are born until we pass away. Because of the constant change in technology, and our brains changing every day, our society needs to be prepared to make changes as well. The other side of the debate states NetGen is no different than any other generation …show more content…
Since I began attending the University of Arkansas in Fall 2016 I have become a full time online student. Before I attended the University of Arkansas, I went to school at Cossatot Community College for two years and each semester I would take two online classes and three in-class classes. Personally, I believe that distance education and classroom instruction are not as equally effective as instructional delivery. The only reason I remain an online student is so I can work full time and save money to pay off my college debt which is what Millennials are known for. However, as a senior, I fear that because I did not go to college and sit in a classroom setting that I have not retained anything I’ve learned over the past two years. Because I am a Millennial, being an online student is sometimes too easy because of our expertise with technology. While taking tests, it takes me two minutes to google a question and answer it correctly without even opening my book or reading our weekly lesson compared to instructional delivery where I would have to study before a test and would not be allowed to have my phone or laptop present. Distance education and class instruction also allows Millennials to be irresponsible. With instructional delivery you have to have assignments due by a certain time on a certain day. For example, 12:30 on Wednesday. With online classes, if you forget you have an assignment, you have until midnight that night to complete it with the help of Google or Quizlet. The fact is, distance education and classroom instruction is convenient for students, not effective. With instructional delivery, students are forced to study before assignments and are supervised during
There is very little doubt that engaging the internet is changing the wiring of our brains. As a matter of fact, everything changes our brains. Our brains are extremely malleable. What Carr seemingly overlooks is the myriad of studies that points that the internet and related technologies are changing our brains for the better, not the worse. In building his argument, he undergoes reverse science: making a claim and looking for studies and correlations that support his claim, while overlooking those that disagree with it.
A Rhetorical analysis of “Generation Velcro” In “Generation Velcro,” Dorothy Woodend discusses the lack of basic skills and knowledge that is being passed down from generation to generation, and how this could be a fundamental problem for both generation Y and the future of planet earth. Woodend, setting the tone for her article, asks the question, “[i]s this generation heading into a coming dark age with little more than the ability to update their Facebook statuses and watch YouTube, all with laces untied?” (par. 7). She contends that “[t]he inability to concentrate in a world of competing bits of information and constant multitasking have led to brains that can no longer keep up,” implying that this problem of concentration is inhibiting this newest generation’s ability to learn the skills necessary to sustain our world properly (par. 12).
In the present global world, we are living in the era of advanced technology like computes, smart phones, TV and so on; and I love that. As early day goes by technology is changed. Technology makes things happen so faster. In the article, “Meet your iBrain,” the authors Gary Small and Gigi Vorgan talk about the current explosion of digital technology and how is changing the way we lives, how we communicate, and it is also rapidly and profoundly altering our brains. “Our brain is evolving right now at a speed like never before” Gary and Gigi.
They Say, I Say: Chapter Thirteen Exercise 1: • Conventional wisdom claims that internet use is harmful for the brain, and that Americans, mostly millennials, spend too much time on social media and other forms of the Web. In Chapter Thirteen of “They Say\I Say”: IMHO, Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein explains the debate of social media and its effect on students’ ability to read, write, and communicate, also explain that conversations that occur on the Web are not real conversations. Technology is a tool; it should not overwhelm the user. The internet not a dynamic entity with malign or benign intent. The proper utilization of it, however, has improved educations and it should be viewed as a accomplishment of the human mind for improving the human mind. Technology, and most often the Internet, is construed as a malign unit, whose purpose is to corrupt and stultify thought.
This generation no longer have to keep remembering every single material they are learning. Or have to go back to the library and spend hours to find the book they used for an assignment. As Kosil and Marcel say, “We are gradually changing from a nation of callused hands to a nation of agile brains … Insofar as new information technology exercises our minds and provides more information, it has to be improving thinking ability” (Source B). This shows people have technology right between their finger tips which enables them to think beyond just the facts. It is no longer only sticking to the facts.
IBrain coins the phrase “digital native” and “digital immigrants (newcomers to the digital world) to compare how the brain operates in each setting. This research is producing a new generation, Net generation or “IBrain generation” causing
In her essay “In defence of the iGeneration,” Renee Wilson argues that today’s technology has benefitted not only the students, but also the generation as a whole. The advancement in technology allows for change, innovation and creativity that result in one of the best generations yet. Although Wilson generalizes today’s iGeneration, she succeeds in providing a compelling argument. Much of her argument is supported by scientific evidence and personal experiences that demonstrate the ability of the iGeneration to accept change and provide self-actualization. Wilson’s use of generalizations reveals a degree of disconnect between the current iGeneration and previous generations.
In the option essay of “The Trouble with Online Education” Mark Edmundson started with question about what people are thinking that the lawyers learn from their clients and the patient's teaches the doctor about the medicine. He also talk about how the teacher are also need to learn from the students and how they can improve their teaching so it would be best fit for all the students in the classroom. He talk about how a president was dismissed because she was not moving forward fast enough on the internet learning. He gave himself and his student as an example of how the teacher should learned from the students and at the same time the students also learn from the teacher. Edmundson also compare the online teacher to a school teacher.
The Influence of Technology In the essay, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr argues that utilization of the internet has an adverse effect on our way of thinking and functioning in everyday life. Whether it be reading a newspaper, or scrolling through Facebook, internet media has forever stamped its name in our existence. Carr explains to us that the internet is a tool used every single day in today’s society, but also makes most of us complacent with the ease of having the world at our fingertips.
Our educational system is failing us. The United States of America is supposed to be the “greatest” country in the world but statistics are showing that our government/educational system is failing us; children/young adults of the nation. Being a student of a middle ranked school in Arizona, I personally have had a first-hand feel for how good and/or bad teaching affects students. Just in high school I have had teachers that would just assign websites as our lesson and even teachers that sit at their desk for the whole hour; don’t even go over the mindset, homework, and maybe only show one problem so that we’ll know what the homework will be like. Until sophomore year I didn’t even know the differences between you’re, your, too, and to.
“Online Learning: The Ruin of Education” was written on March 22, 2012 by Alexander Spring a sophomore student at Tufts University at the time. He wrote the article for the Huffington Post Teen. Spring is a cognitive and brain science major with a minor in economics. He also is a pre-med student, and writes for the Tufts Daily and Huffington Post rather regularly. Spring’s target audience for this article was anyone that would read it, but mostly geared toward young adults and people interested in education.
Outline Introduction Online education, which is also known as distance education, is an education that is based on the internet and utilise many types of technology. This type of education is different from the traditional or classroom education . Some people think that online education is not an adequate method of learning, however, others think that online education is an easier and more efficient way of learning. Moreover, survey result from Pew research center in 2011 shows that around 23% of college graduates attend the online class and about 15% of those completely acquired the degree from online education. Body Argument 1: Lower total cost Opposing Argument: Since online education utilizes the latest and modernized technology devices,
This essay will explore the controversial topic of whether online education is better than traditional education. Online education currently has many advantages, and these are very attractive to most students. One of the most important factor to why so many students in the world is taking online courses is because of its flexibility. It is apparent that student can listen to the lectures or use the course materials anytime and anywhere, as long as they have internet connection.
Theme: Education Narrow : The cause and effect of online learning Lai Che Hui (1001541419) Loo Yee Qi (1001541775) Now a days, a lot of people of the frequently to use technology or electronic products in any way or any time and of course most important is the Internet. A lot of schools started to use online learning to replace traditional paper based teaching method and submit the assignment. Basically, online learning had been widely accepted and practiced throughout the world. There’s tones of online learning student around the world, but did they ever think about what are the benefits they actually enjoyed on online learning?
Also ,those who don't have time because of their work, people who live in rural areas that are far away from educational institutions, those who don't join school when they were young and disabled people can get different kinds of online degrees . 2-Efficiency Online courses can increase efficiency and productivity since teachers can provide access to tools that make discussion and active participation easy. In an online environment, teachers can vary their teaching styles in order to reach students. For example, they can give lectures through using videos and this will be suitable for those who learn best by listening, or through photos for those who learn best by seeing