It is said that events and/or happenings affect a person psychologically. This, in turn, can make said person act a certain way so that they can achieve a short sense of fulfillment. In the twentieth century, Sigmund Freud had an incredibly important idea about the “human psyche” (personality). He concluded that it is made up of more than one aspect and that the psyche was structured into three distinct parts – and, although each develop in different life stages and contain unique features, they all contribute to an individual’s behavior. The three parts include: the ego, superego, and the id. The ego is the part within that is influenced by the outside world and allows us to make decisions. It relies on realistic strategy and reason to satisfy …show more content…
One of these events include the rejection that Ophelia suffers at the hands of Hamlet. While in search for the perfect plot, Hamlet pushes Ophelia away by stating that her “beauty’s power [could] more easily change [her] into a whore” than to turn such a “beautiful girl into a virgin” (3.1.113-115). He continues his rejection by telling her “I used to love you,” (3.1.116) and by insulting her because “wise men know” that in the long run, she’d “cheat on them” (3.1.138-140). When she heard his words she was saddened greatly and was left in a confused stupor. As she is standing there in awe at his words, Ophelia exclaims, “And of all the miserable woman who once enjoyed hearing his sweet, seductive words, I am the most miserable,” (3.1.155-156) proving that she, indeed, felt horrible about the situation she was in. Not only was she mentally affected because of the rejection, she also hated how she knew “what he was before” (3.1.160-161). Furthermore, when her father died, Ophelia spiraled straight into insanity, thus, leading to the action of suicide. Soon after the death of Polonius, Ophelia was seen “talk[ing] about her father…and talk[ing] nonsense,” with a short temper; it was said that she had “been robbed of her sanity” (4.5.4-7, 82-83). When the poor, desolate girl could deal with it no longer, she drowned herself. Unlike his sister though, Laertes preferred to take the route of revenge. His blinding rage allowed only the id of his psyche to be prominent as he sought to kill whoever had murdered his father. Laertes is less idealistic than Hamlet and “is morally inflexible in his devotion to the abstract ideals of justice and honor in avenging his father Polonius” (Lee). This, of course, made the play excited for it provided action that had yet to be seen from other characters. Laertes, thinking that he had killed Polonius,
In Hamlet Act four, it clarifies how Hamlet is being demanded to kill Claudius, but he is afraid to. For what Hamlet did to kill Polonius was unnecessary, he did not know that it was Polonius, Hamlet thought it was Claudius, and instantly, he was genuinely in a bad spot for what he is going through. Hamlet may not plan to carry out his father’s revenge, therefore making his decision can fulfill his destiny. Hamlet is apprehensive about his crowd to believe he’s the bad guy of this. But apparently, he is innocent about why he killed Polonius.
The Awakening Of Hamlet and Laertes Comparing Laertes and Hamlet. Figuring out how they are alike and dislike in many ways, most of the play they are well alike. After Hamlet kills Polonius, Laertes down the road faces the same problems as Hamlet; a murdered father. In the beginning Laertes and Hamlet didn’t have the same similarities, but since both of there fathers were murdered they both have something in common. While Hamlet, is messing around and playing with the murderer as if he was an animal, Laertes takes immediate action.
One primary example which proves the insanity behind Hamlet’s loss of love for Ophelia is when he berates her for being a pawn of her father. During his encounter with Ophelia, Hamlet states that, “If thou dost marry, I’ll give thee this plague for thy dowry. Be thou as chaste as ice, as pure as snow, thou shalt not escape calumny. Get thee to a nunnery, go. Farewell” (x).
Evidently, Laertes immediately assumes Claudius is to blame for the death of his father and swears that from this moment onwards, he will fight to avenge Polonius. This is a clear contrasting view of how Hamlet is indecisive about what he should do to get his own revenge for his father, as he puts off murdering Claudius for a long time. Though, this suggests that Laertes is more hasty than Hamlet due to his fury. Laertes believes that he must kill whomever killed his father without question. On the contrary, Hamlet takes his time to plan out how he will kill who killed his father.
Laertes also experience tragic loss: his father Polonius died at the hands of Hamlet. Contrasting with Hamlet’s indecisive delay, Laertes hears of his fathers death while overseas, and without hesitation, he returns to Denmark to seek his father’s murderer. An effective foil, Laertes embodies the rapid action apparent nowhere in Hamlet’s decision making. Hamlet bears the burdensome knowledge that Claudius slew his father for a lengthy period, yet procrastinates and wastes time. As Richard Levin says, “Hamlet is grieving for months…
Her true self is clear when she has a conversation about Hamlet, first with Laertes, her brother, then with Polonius, her father. After Laertes advises Ophelia to fear Hamlet and to be cautious with him, she replies by telling him not to lecture her (Act: I: Scene: 3: Lines 48-50). She is able to criticize her brother to some extent, but when her father gives her the same lecture as he did and tells her not to accept Hamlet’s hand, she simply replies, “I shall obey, my lord” (Act: I: Scene 3: Line 135). This early scene in the play sets up Ophelia’s mood. Although Ophelia wants to believe Hamlet is true to her and “Hath given countenance to his speech…With almost all the holy vows of heaven” (Act: I: Scene: 3: Lines: 112-113), she must listen to her father and follow his orders.
Women have been dominated and manipulated by men for many years. In Hamlet, the character Ophelia was living under the demands of her father. She didn’t actually decide anything for herself. She obeyed every demand she received from her father Polonius because for her it was a form of loyalty. When Polonius was killed by Hamlet, she became vulnerable since she no longer had the person who decided everything for her.
Hamlet's Heightening Insanity In Hamlet by William Shakespeare, it is clear that Hamlet was once sane, but the tragic events of his life led him to be insane. Grieving over the loss of a loved one, yet a parent, is extremely difficult. These hardships can cause a lot of problems in one’s life. In Hamlet, Shakespeare incorporates a theme of madness to serve a motive. In fact, Hamlet is not initially crazy, but plans to use the insanity as a trick to achieve what he wanted-- revenge.
He blames everything on Claudius because he is the one that killed Hamlet’s father and now his mother. This give Hamlet peace about all of the events that have lead to this moment. We should learn from this that revenge in haste can be chaotic and unsuccessful. Revenge may not always be the answer, but if that is what you choose, then it needs to be well thought out and tested for flaws. I think that Laertes got the revenge that he wanted and even though it resulted in his own death as well, he got some closure that he needed.
A major controversy that has divided the literature community for hundreds of years is the debate of whether Hamlet, in William Shakespeare’s well known tragedy Hamlet, is feigning madness or is actually mad. It can be proven though textual evidence that Hamlet is not insane and his feigned insanity is just a ruse to distract those around him from seeing his superior conscience, given to him though the late King of Denmark, which makes him more aware than the average citizen. The higher sense of consciousness separates Hamlet from the others because it makes him a thinker instead of a follower. This can be seen in his interactions with other characters and how his feigned insanity affects Ophelia, who is also a thinker. Hamlet’s feigned madness can be exemplified in his interactions
Hamlet 's belief in that habit causes one to do evil without guilt can be connected to his own downfalls. Even so, Hamlet assumes that King Claudius is the habitual action that destroys good senses and strengthens bad behaviour. QUOTE. Hamlet is speaking to his mother about how habits can trigger the fall of an individual. The "monster" in this sense is Claudius, who Hamlet considers is the main cause of Gertrude 's sinful behaviour.
Throughout the play Hamlet continues to act insane and even dies with the act continuing. Even after Hamlet gathers all the evidence that proves Claudius is the murder, Hamlet continues to behave in a strange way. When he mistakenly murders Polonius he does not react as a sane person would. This act enrages Laertes, who then wants to avenge his father’s death. Driven to madness by the murder of his father, Laertes, with the help of Claudius conspires to kill Hamlet.
Hamlet speaks to Ophelia, “You should not have believed me, for virtue cannot so inoculate our old stock but we shall relish of it. I loved you not” (III.i. 126-129). While Hamlet is speaking to Ophelia, he first talks about how he loved her once then explains to her that he does not love her. Ophelia is upset because she is in love with Hamlet. Ophelia’s death is confirmed by the doctor when he says “He obsequies have been as far enlarged as we have warranty.
Hamlet, a play written by William Shakespeare, dives into the transformations and developments of many characters. One character that is easily seen in the play is the transformation of Ophelia. The character of Ophelia changes drastically throughout the play from an obedient lover to an insane woman that ultimately drowns herself. Ophelia’s transformation is one that is caused by uncertainty and a love for someone who pretends to not love her back. Ophelia’s doubts of Hamlet’s love are planted when she is conversing with her brother, Laertes, and her father, Polonius.
Hamlet is never consistent with Ophelia, he doesn’t assure her that they can be together. He rather shames her tell her things such as “Get thee (-- removed HTML --) a nunnery. Why wouldst thou be a breeder of sinners?” (3.1.131-2). Instead of drawing potential lovers in by his good nature, he condemns them, and further drives them to madness.