I would like to state that before I make my stance on the question that I will be addressing in my essay as a response to
Andy Clark and David Chalmers’ “The Extended Mind”, that I am simply expressing my own personal and conceptual opinions on whether the authors provide persuasive grounds to believe that our mental states and processes can extend beyond our brain and body into the technological environment, in which case my answer is yes, I think they do. I realize that the latter is also just as reasonable, as I have no real or physical proof of a technologically extended mind myself other than what I personally believe in, so though I think a good persuasive argument can implant the seeds of a new idea in ones mind, solid proof works more
…show more content…
Aiden must rely on his close childhood friend Bailey to try to remind him of who he his, and confirm basic information about his life to the best of her ability, (perhaps Aiden is estranged from his parents in this case). Bailey knows Aiden exceptionally well, she helps him to re-learn everything from where he lives, to what his hobbies are and what he 's interested in on a regular basis until his memories begin to come back to him. Aiden relies on Bailey 's cognitive functions for the retrieval of information about his life, through trial and repetition until that information is confirmed into beliefs that Aiden can depend on so that he may begin to start functioning independently again. He can begin to rely strictly on his own brain funtions regarding information about himself and no longer on his friend Bailey, who acted temporary stand in as for Aidens memories when he was unable to perform those functions on his own. What if the situation were slightly altered in which instead of being Aiden 's close childhood friend Bailey were actually a highly intelligent computer program, similar to an A.I such as Suri or Cleverbot in which one can interactively hold a coherent conversation with and share information both ways. Typically an A.I will have access to most of the information available on the web and can retain personal information the person conversing with it shares about themself. In the case where Bailey is actually an A.I rather than a human being, Bailey is still playing the relevant role of Aiden 's memory despite a small difference in the circumstance of what Bailey is, the role is still being carried out in the exact same
In the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid” written by Nicholas Carr, it talked about how Google and other technologies are changing the way we think and process information. This article starts out by talking about an instance where a person was almost killed by an artificial brain (Carr 731). The author talks about how over the years he believes that someone is changing his brain and the way that he thinks. The author gives examples of this by telling how he used to be able to read a long passage and keep attention to it but now he can’t keep focus for more than a few sentences (Carr 731).
The brain will become a greater learner by the things we discover every day. Carr provides examples of the authors in the article. He identifies with the computer in the scene rather than the robotic human and seems to suggest that internet is going to cause us to become more machine-like than machines themselves. How their minds were before and after, how they would for hours but now they cannot.
Cecilia Martinez Burr Psy 302-041: Psychological Research Techniques Fall 2016 October 27, 2016 JAR #3 Title U Can Touch This: How Tablets Can Be Used to Study Cognitive Development Introduction The general topic of the article was to examine the methodological gap in developmental research by testing the viability of using touch screen tablets in the study of cognitive development. Previous research on this issue tested the general viability of tablets in developmental cognitive research in children aged 1-4 by utilizing presentations on a web-technology-based tablet using a storybook method and an eye-tracking paradigm. Their results showed that the tablet based method proved more reliability than other methods and proved as a viable
Are we ready to start being asked about our sexual orientation? LGBT? Does one even feel comfortable being asked about one’s sexual orientation and giving an answer to strangers. In the essay, “Despite the Controversy, We’re Glad We Asked” by S. Alan Ray talks about them asking students their sexual orientation on their college application.
Nicholas Kristof is a two-time Pulitzer prizewinning books and “Prudence or Cruelty” was feature in the New York Times in 2013. In “Prudence or Cruelty” it discuss the potential of ridding our society of food stamps to help boost our economy. Children everyday wonder when, not what, their next meal will be. As sad as it sounds, but “5 percent of American households have very low food security” (Kristof 172). This basically means the household can run out of food whenever, and this usually leads to a parent not eating to make sure their kids have enough to eat.
In agreement, the intelligence of our brain is flattening into artificial intelligence and we are heavily rely on it. As pancake, we are becoming less and less dense of our dense cultural inheritance while spreading a search wide
has a human mind because the A.I. is creating to pass this exam. Nowadays, A.I. can do only a task that exactly decided, for example automated drive, doing chess game, or Siri in the iPhone. In addition, there is a problem of language. Even if the A.I has a great system of managing language, it is impossible to use language in true meaning. It is only the ability that human have.
Nicholas Carr in The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains (2010) asserts that, “With the exception of alphabets and number systems, the net may well be the single most powerful mind-altering technology that has ever come into general use. At the very least, it’s the most powerful that has come along since the book.” (Carr, 2010, Pg. 108) Carr explains this quote throughout the entire book. He continues by adding real world examples and data from other studies. From all of the information that is gathered for this book, he creates the idea that internet has drastically changed culture and brought forward new ways of thinking that will exist for many years to come.
“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.” By Emma Lazarus (1883). No undocumented person should be treated as a criminal. Undocumented immigrants arise in the United States due to the lack of opportunities in their homeland, and they know America is a nation where a dream can become real. Those individuals willingly perform jobs that nearly all Americans refuse to do; they are reliable people, pay taxes, and help America’s economy. Yet, should undocumented immigrants be granted a path to citizenship?
As a result people are allowing their brains to form another of thinking in a more broader way. People are applying their knowledge which they gathered from a variety of technological sources to convey a concept in their thinking
Google co-founder Sergey Brin states, “certainly if you had all the world’s information directly attached to your brain, or an artificial brain that was smarter than your brain, you’d be better off” (Carr 10). Larry Page and Sergey Brin often talk about how they want to create a machine-like HAL in Stanley Kubrick’s film, “A Timeless Space Odyssey”. For the most part, Carr believes this project is an ambitious project filled with uncertainty and interest all around, but still feels uncertain about how we will be able to reap in all
Supporters of computationalism and strong artificial intelligence claim that computers are capable of intelligence and other cognitive states if they are programed correctly. Therefore, computers can explain how human cognition performs. I contend that John Searle is correct in his claim that computers are incapable of understanding language and are, therefore, unable to explain human cognition. I begin the essay with Searle’s Chinese room argument, and explain how he uses it to prove that computers cannot understand language as they operate on syntax alone, where syntax is insufficient in producing understanding. Thereafter, I provide a description of the robot reply to the Chinese room argument, which states that a robot with a computer insert and sensory apparatus would be able to achieve understanding, a view which Searle argues is still insufficient.
Nicholas Carr, What the Internet is doing to Our Brains The Shallows (2010) asserts that, “The price we pay to assume technology’s power is alienation.” He supports this assertion by saying, “They both ultimately achieve their mental and behavioral effects by shaping the synaptic organization of the brain.” Also by, “ We long to keep it activated.” The writer concludes in order for people to improve their thoughts, they will have to cope with the new technology and how they think. Carr believes that technology is taking over how people interact with each other.
Based upon the analysis, Parnas’ article is geared more towards people involved in the field of Artificial Intelligence where Eldridge’s article is geared towards people who are not necessarily knowledgeable about Artificial Intelligence yet are interested to learn more about the topic. Throughout the article, Parnas maintains the skeptical attitude towards Artificial Intelligence, literally ending with “Devices that use heuristics to create the illusion of Intelligence present a risk we should not accept” (Parnas, 6). Eldridge on the other hand, maintains a positive attitude throughout the article despite the shortcomings of AI. Together, both authors provide compelling arguments for and against Artificial
In the realm of Philosophy, different views about the definition of the mind and its interactions exist. Among the many, Dualism stands as one of the most debatable, thanks to its position about the relationship of the mind and body, and its repercussions. This assignment discusses the dualist relationship between the mind and the body, as well as its impact on the individual free will. It asserts Interventionism as an extension of Dualism, as well as an alternative to Determinism. The objective of this endeavor is to present the Dualist approach to Mind and Body as an alternative or possible solution to the dilemma of Determinism.