The Fall of the House of Dixie: The Civil War and the Social Revolution That Transformed the South by Bruce Levine reiterates the compelling story of how the Civil War overturned the economic, political, and social lifestyle of the Old South. This war downright destroyed the Confederacy and the society it both represented and protected ever since the institution of slavery was established. Explained through words from those who endured it, Levine’s work illustrates the way in which a war endeavored to preserve the “status quo” fundamentally become a second American Revolution. The only difference? Soldiers were fighting their neighbors rather than an outside force. Through the usage of letters, diaries, government documents, and newspaper articles, …show more content…
Before the Civil War broke out, the South was the most powerful section of the country; it was the wealthiest, controlled Congress, and produced Presidents. Yet, slavery influenced all of these factors. The 4 million slaves that were seen as property, free labor, and assets proved to be an enormous, economic benefit. Even the most powerful slave owners were living comfortably and saw themselves as more entitled than the Northerners. As the Civil War progressed, especially during 1863, anxiety plagued the slave owners since their Southern civilization and way of life was being threatened by the Union Army. “This was not merely an economic blow; it was a challenge to and rejection of their most basic views, values, and identities.” (#158). Slavery was around in the United States for over 2 centuries before the Civil War and many Southerners deeply depended on it for they knew of no life without it. Once Abraham Lincoln was elected into office in 1860, masters viewed him as treasonous and perceived the slaves who began to show resistance to their demands as …show more content…
One of his most consistent points throughout the text was to show how deeply intertwined the Confederate states were with slavery. Levine successfully portrays this as he writes with passion alongside providing evidence to back up his arguments. He is not an author who depicts the South as some immense evil, or the North as the champion heroes - rather, he aims to show his audience moreso of why the war was fought instead of focusing on the actual battles. Personally, I loved Levine’s writing style because he does not shy away from the harsh reality of what took place during the Civil War. He definitely achieved his goal with writing The Fall of House Dixie and students in classrooms across the U.S. would benefit from reading his work. In less than 300 pages, with 100 being dedicated to notes of original sources, he presents a captivating story of why the South went to war, the reasons for its self-destruction, and the effects that arose from this conflict on the lives of blacks and whites who lived during
This piece of work has information ranging from the death toll of the war itself to the economical disaster it caused in the south. Warren leaves out no interesting information. Robert Penn Warren is a poet and a novelist with an interest in the subject of history. He never called him self a historian, nor did he want to ever be labeled as one, but he is certain that our Civil
Isabelle Wolfe Baruch Isabelle Wolfe, born 4 Mar 1850 in Winnsboro, Fairfield, South Carolina, the daughter of Sailing Wolfe, a young merchant and planter of Winnsboro, and Sara Cohen, daughter of Rabbi Hartwig Cohen of Charleston. Isabelle, known as “Belle” married Simon Baruch who had immigrated from Schwersenz, near Poland, in East Prussia, to Camden, South Carolina in 1855 to avoid Prussian conscription. At the time he immigrated to America, Simon was fifteen years old and the only person he knew in America when he arrived was a man by the name of Mannes Baum. Mr. Baum was the owner of a general store in Camden, SC and was married to an aunt of Baruch’s mother.
A great deal of contradicting information has been layered over the nature of the Civil War. Those would remember it today as a “just cause,” maintain that the issue of succession was solely about states’ rights against what the Southern States saw as an aggressive Republican government under, newly elected, President Abraham Lincoln. There are many surviving documents from the pre-war era supporting the argument as States Rights only and many supporting documents that support the institution of Slavery as a central issue. According to Dew’s, historians are also often split on what was the true nature of the act of succession by the Southern States of the US. It is hard to remove slavery from the many arguments altogether, and perhaps, including
Henry Steele Commager’s main topic is historical causation-- moreover, why we need need to know the cause of history. “Though it is not given to us to know the causes of things, we cannot conclude therefrom that history is chaos, or that it is wholly without meaning” (13). Commager says the South should have won because they had “trump cards,” such as “grand strategy” and “foreign intervention” (Commager 16). He also goes into detail about the reasons for the Confederacy’s collapse, giving reasons such as the South being hopelessly outnumbered, not having decent transportation, a blockade of all their waterways, having a political leader who didn’t account for anything (Jefferson Davis), and the way they ran their political system (Commager 18-19). After going into much detail about the possible reasons for the Confederacy’s defeat, Commager explains what he means by saying things such as “...Or perhaps it was all of these things combined, something which, for want of a better term, historians call loss of nerves” (Commager 20).
This book covered a story of someone who had a clean vision of what it felt like to be free. Nat Turner’s skillful plan of a slave rebellion was succeeded by the influence of religion amongst African Americans and by his status amongst white Americans. Unawareness and anxiety were the effects of Turner’s rebellion on white Americans which eventually led to a number of consequences for slaves. As we all know slavery was a vital part of life in the South and Virginia in the 1800s.
Despite the many years after the Civil War ended in 1865, the war’s significance was still great enough to have caused such controversy with the public over its meaning. In David W. Blight’s Race and Reunion, the meaning of the war changes throughout the period of Reconstruction not due to the misconception of it solely, but due to what we wanted to interpret from the war (or rather, what we remembered from the war that eventually changed over time). Blight argues, “I am primarily concerned with the ways that contending memories clashed or intermingled in public memory, and not in developing professional historiography of the Civil War” (Blight, Prologue). With this being said, the meaning of the Civil War changed through what people felt and
As we know, the concluding factor of the war, left the north in victory. This created a massive amount of changes to be made in American society. Although slavery was abolished during this time, other challenges arose during the reconstruction era in the south. I strongly argue that, through the result of the
The Civil War was one of the most defining events in American history and the antebellum years of the 1840’s were filled with turmoil and bloodshed due to wars. The expansion of slavery into Western territories caused a great deal of controversy and increased the sectional tensions. Since drafting of the Constitution, the North and the South had grown further apart in terms of economy, ideology, and society. Slavery became even more divisive when it threatened to expand westward because non-slave holding white settlers did not want to compete with slaveholders in the new territories. The south viewed slavery as essential to their traditional ways but the north opposed its spread.
But the South still didn’t have enough to keep slaves from absconding. In 1850, the South pushed through Congress an even harsher and more punitive law, which was more invasive of the rights claimed by free states. The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 specifically required all marshals and deputy marshals to carry out its provisions. These provisions included to arrest and keep safe fugitives and to assist slave holders in returning their slaves. The provisions also included a command to citizens to aid and assist in the execution of the law, and it ordered local courts to issue to slaveholders certificates empowering them to use force and restraint to remove and return their fugitives.
Annotated Bibliography History.com Staff. (2009, January 01). Jefferson Davis. Retrieved April 25, 2016, from history.com/topics/american-civil-war/jefferson-davis
Echoing the arguments made in the book, Why the South Lost the Civil War, the same historians in the book, The Elements of Confederate Defeat: Nationalism, War Aims, and Religion, aim to fully explore the reason why the Conference eventually lost the greatest and most vicious conflict on United States soil. Exploring three key themes of nationalism, the war aims of the south, and the religion of the southern states, the authors in the book ultimately claim as their thesis that the Confederacy lost the Civil War for the sole reason that the southern states lacked the morale and the will to successfully win the war. Furthermore, the nationalism of the Confederacy was underscored by the religious consequences and guilt felt by southerners over
White soldiers understanding of slavery changed during the course of the war because at one point they were willing to free some slaves but not all and when the president fed into this it only made the southerners upset because then they knew all of them would be free. Soldiers identified slavery as the reason for the war. For Manning, such samplings of soldiers' writing represent the fundamental fact that right from the beginning soldiers knew that the war was about slavery. Chandra Manning tries to get at how common troops black, Union, and Confederate viewed the Civil War and the reasons for fighting in the war. The answer?
“The South grew, but it did not develop,” is the way one historian described the South during the beginning of the nineteenth century because it failed to move from an agrarian to an industrial economy. This was primarily due to the fact that the South’s agricultural economy was skyrocketing, which caused little incentive for ambitious capitalists to look elsewhere for profit. Slavery played a major role in the prosperity of the South’s economy, as well as impacting it politically and socially. However, despite the common assumption that the majority of whites in the South were slave owners, in actuality only a small minority of southern whites did in fact own slaves. With a population of just above 8 million, the number of slaveholders was only 383,637.
The living legacy of the United States Civil War is a complicated time in American history one finds difficult to describe. The ramification of the war prior, during and after still haunt the current citizens who call The States their home. Tony Horwitz’s book Confederates in the Attic: Dispatches from the Unfinished Civil War looks at the wide gap of discontent that still looms in the late 1990s. For some southerners, the Confederacy still lives on through reenactments, stories and beliefs. For others in the South, reminders the land was dedicated to the Confederacy spark hatred and spite.
The history of America has always been of great importance to humanity because of their ideologies, like Neo-liberalism, Nationalism and union. The American Civil War was a bloody movement that was of extreme importance to the history of the United States because, as the movie said, they held the human dignity destiny in their hands when Abraham Lincoln proposed the 13th amendment in which he would abolish slavery forever, changing the life of millions of Negroes. In this movie, we can see how a difficult task it was for Abraham Lincoln trying to collect votes from both the Republic and Democratic parties in order to achieve the 13th Amendment acceptance to the Constitution. For many years, the Southern economy was mainly based on really big plantations that were worked by black people, slaves. Americans saw this as a normal because slavery had been there since long time ago, but it was Lincoln who started wondering if this was right, if white and black people truly weren´t equals.