It is better to be feared that to be loved, if you can’t be both. He should only be feared but not hated. The love could change as soon as the ruler withdrew benefits and concessions. Dishonesty and Fraud, according to Machiavelli, it was not always essential for a prince to be honest. Fraud was no dishonesty in politics.
He helped work encourage religions and practices throughout his empire. “...show respect for the cultural practices of the people he had conquered. He did this by adopting some of these practices himself.” (“Alexander the Great”) He also listened to his people and allowed them to return home after a long war. “At this point, Alexander had accumulated one of the largest empires in history. However, his soldiers were ready to revolt.
Although known for his anger and his war driven mind, Alexander was a fair and valiant King to his people. Why was Alexander the Great so important? What does it matter? He connected the world and brought about a simple scientific revolution that pushed the world forward. Ideas were spreading rapidly and new trade occurred as well as travel.
"Do you think," said he, ‘I have not just cause to weep, when I consider that Alexander at my age had conquered so many nations, and I have all this time done nothing that is memorable’” (Lives). Caesar’s desire for glory parallels the desire and actions of Alexander the Great. The Romans loved to read about glorious acts of their empire, and they undoubtedly enjoyed the comparison of Julius Caesar’s glory to that of Alexander the Great, one of the world’s greatest conquerors. Plutarch says that Alexander, as a young man, “was extremely eager and vehement, and in his love of glory, and the pursuit of it, he showed a solidity of high spirit and magnanimity far above his age” (Lives). Desire for glory was innate to Alexander as it was to Caesar.
He wanted to conquer all Greece and Persia who years back destroyed and burned Athens. Alexander was tutored by Aristotle who was a brilliant
He then set off and conquered Egypt, the Persian Empire, and won a hard battle against India before his troops forced him to return home. Alexander then died at the age of 32. Most people see Alexander as Great because he conquered a lot of land, built a massive empire, and was a military genius, but Alexander was not so great. Alexander the Great did not deserve his title as Great because he gained his power by fear, killed innocent
Alexander’s successes were numerous, and he had only faced extreme resistance a handful of times before he met the Scythians. This group challenged him immensely and declared victory over him in one of their early engagements. After this, the Scythians were basically taunting Alexander and it forced him to go against his advisors and attack them yet again. This time around, he was victorious as he caused the Scythians to retreat. The real reason that Alexander wanted to conquer the Persian Empire was not only retaliation or revenge, but also as a test of his true abilities.
(BGE) Was Alexander the Great really great? Based on his remarkable achievement, leadership, and concern for others, Alexander the Great was great. Alexander was great for his large empire, his influence, and his generosity to others. One reason that Alexander was great is his large empire. At just the age of 20, Alexander set off to conquer Persia.
The Prince The essay The Prince, by Niccolo Machiavelli, is considered the basis for modern politics and is still very relevant today. He provides means of how how prince should govern and come to power. Machiavelli’s theory is that there is no “good” or “bad” in politics, that the only thing that matters is the stability of the state. A Pulitzer Prize winner, Jared Diamond says Machiavelli is “ a crystal-clear realist who understands the limits and uses of power.” Diamond says that The Prince is still very relevant today because Machiavelli insists “that we are not helpless at the hands of bad luck.” Machiavelli starts The Prince out by giving descriptions on which types of kingdoms are easier to rule. Kingdoms that are hereditary, they are easy to rule but difficult to take and a kingdom that is easy to take is difficult to rule.
Eventually, however, a prince must move from being achieving his own goals to becoming the facilitator or catalyst for his people’s goals. In doing so, a prince will be loved by his people, without necessitating coercion or fear. That is not to say that force has no place for a prince -- force has an important role in safeguarding the state and the people’s goals --, but force cannot be used to coerce the people into loving a ruler. In the corporate realm, companies that give employees more autonomy experience more output and product development. In fact, giving employees directed goals driven by extrinsic incentives often led to poorer performance (Chamorro-Premuzic).