Cruelty In Machiavelli's The Prince

800 Words4 Pages
In the book “The Prince” there was an advice that was one of the important factors that a prince should have in his knowledge. That was “cruelty and compassion; and whether it is better to be loved than feared” (Machiavelli 1916). It is better to have loved more, or vice versa, the book is a good example of the accuracy of its problems psychological in their early stages is one of the best parts of the mission. The gestation period for cruelty to replace the feeling of a prince, but he likes his subjects united and better, he should not worry loyal. Whether face criticism for his cruelty to his prince for a long time, or reverse. The answer is there should be one or two; it is better to be feared, it is much more difficult if cannot combine…show more content…
A second example is given of Scipio who, because of his mercy, allowed the disease and the lack of discipline among the soldiers. Machiavelli effectively sums up the chapter by saying: So, the question to be loved or feared, my conclusion is that because some men love what they want, but the fear when the prince wants a wise prince should trust that control, not in what it cannot control. Therefore relationships based on fear are reliable, although based on love are, in one case, the prince has control and the other has none. Alexander apprehended Gaza previous afterwards passed going on interested in Egypt, where he remained respond to by means of a captor. Through these achievements, he safeguarded controller of the Mediterranean coastline. In 332 Alexandria the city, which far along developed the commercial center, literary, and scientific of the Greek world. While capturing Alexandria, alexander the great was not heated by the people due to his powerful strategies. The people had respect for him and could not disagree him or stand against him but thou they did not see cruelty from
Open Document