ipl-logo

Cruelty In Machiavelli's The Prince

800 Words4 Pages

In the book “The Prince” there was an advice that was one of the important factors that a prince should have in his knowledge. That was “cruelty and compassion; and whether it is better to be loved than feared” (Machiavelli 1916). It is better to have loved more, or vice versa, the book is a good example of the accuracy of its problems psychological in their early stages is one of the best parts of the mission. The gestation period for cruelty to replace the feeling of a prince, but he likes his subjects united and better, he should not worry loyal. Whether face criticism for his cruelty to his prince for a long time, or reverse. The answer is there should be one or two; it is better to be feared, it is much more difficult if cannot combine …show more content…

A second example is given of Scipio who, because of his mercy, allowed the disease and the lack of discipline among the soldiers. Machiavelli effectively sums up the chapter by saying: So, the question to be loved or feared, my conclusion is that because some men love what they want, but the fear when the prince wants a wise prince should trust that control, not in what it cannot control. Therefore relationships based on fear are reliable, although based on love are, in one case, the prince has control and the other has none. Alexander apprehended Gaza previous afterwards passed going on interested in Egypt, where he remained respond to by means of a captor. Through these achievements, he safeguarded controller of the Mediterranean coastline. In 332 Alexandria the city, which far along developed the commercial center, literary, and scientific of the Greek world. While capturing Alexandria, alexander the great was not heated by the people due to his powerful strategies. The people had respect for him and could not disagree him or stand against him but thou they did not see cruelty from

Show More
Related

  • Alexander The Great Dbq

    818 Words  | 4 Pages

    Without their trust, Alexander would not have achieved as much as he did. These examples show that Alexander was great because they provided insight into what Alexander achieved. He had to work hard to gain the people’s trust. It all paid off when he was able to say that he was the greatest leader of his time. Today, everyone wants a trustworthy leader.

    Read More

  • What Are Alexander's Motives

    690 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander, believing he was a god, aimed to conquer the Persian empire with the goal of exceeding his father’s achievements and living up to the standards of his idol, Achilles. First and foremost, it must be understood that Alexander and his father shared a competitive

    Read More

  • Hatred In Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince

    654 Words  | 3 Pages

    In The Prince (1532), Machiavelli lists elements a prince should have. The biggest thing Machiavelli cautions against is breeding hatred. He claims that “[…] a wise prince should establish himself on that which is in his own control and not in that of others; he must endeavor only to avoid hatred” (Machiavelli 82). Hatred will lead to loss of control. If the civilians hate the prince, then they have control over him.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Research Paper

    445 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexandria is considered to be the best example of ALexander's successful spreading of Greek Culture. Alexander may have been somewhat known as a big-headed, narcissistic leader, so much so as to going as far as to say that he was the son of Zeus, the King of the Gods. But Alexander truly did deserve the title of “The Great”. To be great in history is not to be a nice, sweet person who is kind to everyone, but to be a smart ruler who knows what he wants and gets what he wants. To be great in history is a title that comes with a lot of speculation, but

    Read More

  • Why Is Alexander The Great So Successful

    624 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great is still revered today for his large-scale conquer of the known world, this success can be linked to his most important trait. Alexander’s determination was what allowed him to be so successful both on and off the battlefield. The event that prompted Alexander’s world conquer was when he became king of Macedonia in the year 336 BC. Alexander’s starting point was the empire that his father had built up before his death. By using both similar strategies as his father and his own determination, Alexander expanded the already successful empire.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great: How Great Was Alexander The Great?

    998 Words  | 4 Pages

    At the age of 20, he inherited the kingdom of Macedonia and had set out on his first mission: conquering Persia. Alexander was given the nickname “Alexander the Great”, due to his success in his Greek empire. However, after taking a closer look at how Alexander maintained his empire and treated his troops, it is evident that he was vain, cruel, and disloyal, which proves that Alexander the Great was not truly great.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great: The Spread Of Greek Culture

    1068 Words  | 5 Pages

    Alexander’s father triggered the start of his lifelong love of learning and openness to foreign cultures by introducing his son to an ancient Greek philosopher. “Philip II hired Aristotle to tutor Alexander at age 14 in Greek, Hebrew, Babylonian and Latin, rhetoric and justice.” Aristotle taught young Alexander to accept all religions and educated him about the world. Joshua Mark claims, “...as Alexander traveled, he spread Greek thought and culture in his wake, thus "hellenizing" (to make `Greek’ in culture and civilization) those he conquered.” While Alexander fought in battles, he left his knowledge and beliefs of the Greek culture in the areas he fought.

    Read More

  • Why Alexander Was Great Dbq

    881 Words  | 4 Pages

    He was determined to uphold his fathers dream and take control of Persia. Alexander was considered strategic in his battles and wasn’t scared to go first before his army into war. His appreciation and sympathy for religion and his troops is what makes him such a heroic leader. By these

    Read More

  • Lao-Tzu Vs Machiavelli

    312 Words  | 2 Pages

    Referring to the works of Niccolo Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu in succession highlight how truly at opposition the messages are. In spite of the fact that both works aim to create a model of a good leadership , «Tao-te Ching» by Lao-Tzu discusses peace, straightforwardness, and giving the universe a chance to work its will, while «The Qualities of the Prince» by Machiavelli emphasizes the significance of war, and the common depravity of men. There are no specific reasons that these two methods of reasoning ought to be in agreement, one written in the sixth century, and the other the sixteenth, however they are comparable in that they are very honored among society and the quotes taken from the content are frequently cited and considered insightful,

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Isocrates Address To Philip Of Macedonia

    818 Words  | 4 Pages

    The conquests of Alexander the Great during the 4th century BC undoubtedly transformed the ancient world, bringing people of foreign lands into contact with Greek ideals and customs that spawned a unique Hellenistic period of both decaying and generative traditions. Despite the historical dramatization of Alexander, emphasizing his charisma and intellect as being the driving forces in creating an empire of a size that had never been imagined before, the contexts of cultural tension between Greek and Persian societies, a fractious Greek political state, and civil strife from an overpopulated Greek world greatly supplemented Alexander’s inherent traits in clearing a path for him to rise and embark on a path of conquest in the pursuit of eternal

    Read More

  • Why Is Alexander The Great Unique

    525 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great is one of the most fascinating and remarkable figures in history. As a military commander, he conquered vast territories and created one of the largest empires the world has ever seen. But what makes Alexander even more interesting is his unique personality, his strategic thinking, and his determination to achieve his goals. In this essay, I will explore the reasons why Alexander the Great is an intriguing figure in history, what makes him unique, and what others have said about him.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Machiavelli's The Prince

    707 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Although one should not reason about Moses, as he was a mere executor of things that had been ordered for him by God, nonetheless he should be admired if only for that grace which made him so deserving of speaking with God” (22). In the context of The Prince, this statement proves to be duplicitous because Machiavelli claims that he will not reason about Moses, but then uses the following pages to do precisely that. Furthermore, Machiavelli draws extensively from the actions of Moses and the Old Testament God, although Machiavelli is often regarded as an antagonist of the Church. Machiavelli’s handbook for princes consists of concrete advice for rulers that directly reflect the more abstracted stories in Exodus. For instance, Machiavelli’s description of human nature in The Prince mirrors Moses’ experiences as the leader of the Israelites in Exodus.

    Read More

  • Vanishing Accomplishments Of Alexander The Great And Prince Philip

    709 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great was a great leader and conquered most of the mediterranean. Alexander the Great has some astonishing accomplishments during the time of his rule and his whole life. Alexander “never lost a battle” in over a decade of conflicts (“8 surprising facts”).

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Accomplishments

    882 Words  | 4 Pages

    (“Alexander”)During the final battle in July 332 B.C., eight thousand Phoenicians were reportedly killed, and thirty thousand were taken as slaves. (“Alexander”)The Egyptians welcomed him as a liberator from the hated Persians; they also proclaimed him the son of Amon-Ra, the supreme Egyptian god. Historians think this may be one reason Alexander considered himself divine. To truly understand Alexander the Great, one must understand his later life. He founded the city of Alexandria on the site of the old Greek trading port of Naucratis.

    Read More

  • Erasmus Vs Machiavelli

    1034 Words  | 5 Pages

    Both of these highly influential authors had different opinions on ruling that would shape how people would rule during their time and for rulers to come. One of Machiavelli’s major points in The Prince was that it was better to be feared than to be loved. He said this was because while both ways can be useful tools to help one rule, men are less likely to turn a ruler if they were afraid of punishment. Machiavelli had little faith in the common man and had this to say about them, “They are ungrateful, fickle, deceptive and deceiving, avoiders of dangers, eager to gain”(pg.353).

    Read More

More about Cruelty In Machiavelli's The Prince

Open Document