Urban planning is an essential tool to organise or shape the property surrounding us and also to make things convenience for the citizens. It shapes the development, social cohesion, economic transformation and access to buildings or housing as well as transportation. The five principals of Spatial Planning and Land Use Management namely;
Spatial justice – The opportunity city
Spatial sustainability – The caring city
Efficiency – The inclusive city
Spatial resilience – The safe city
Good administration
They were made and seen as the most effective implementation to be recess in the urban planning world.
Historically, from an international vision, spatial planning has been more concerned mostly with the kind of relationship that exist
…show more content…
The government had to intervene with those authorities and remove people who were there illegally, but at the meantime, the government had to organise places for those people to stay and that’s how the RDP came about. This had affected the whole spatial planning. Because in achieving good planning, we must be mindful of the reality of our urban social and economic needs and also we must ensure that the appropriate skills are available at all times in sufficient quantity. Our planning must be consistence with time. Yes our planning is evolving but it is still based on the western models. As planning is to make plans, strategies and interpretation. Planning of land use helps to minimise the level of implausibility about the form and level of development that will be appropriate and acceptable. This raises the supply of residential and to reduce the price of land for development. And we must also take to account that social and economic changes will effect on property such as land and building values. The value of land and buildings increases as the economy expand and more value for investment. Where economy is more effective in places such as Johannesburg and living in CBD, you don’t get to pay less price for land and also buildings. So as planners, our objectives is …show more content…
This may be hard to achieve if we look at how political change has given rise to the displacement of strategic plans in a number of American cities, even in some provinces here in South Africa. The political parties compete with one another to rule and have more seats in the parliament. They make promises to citizens concerning better life and in the other hands they must treat people in a good manner to convince them. This affect planning and developing. For example, People in Hillbrow most of them do not pay rent and they have turned the place for illegal deeds. But the government cannot just remove them as they need to fulfil what is known as Bill of Rights. Everyone has right to shelter. Moving the master planning approaches in the direction of strategic spatial planning , grounded through a link to infrastructure development. The relation between infrastructure and spatial appears to be firming up the position of planning. It has managed to empower the better and most integration in the interior of the municipality around the purposes of the spatial development framework (SDF). As property development is a vital key industry in most of the cities, because it can provide job to thousands of citizens and lower the unemployment rate that is severe to control in the country, its patterns are both unmaintainable and unjust. The development of
When foreign buyers empty purchase their properties, there is no money being spent in the community and little money being put back into the area’s economy. When foreign investors purchase property in Ontario, there is no concern about the province’s population or economy. They just have concerns about their personal investment and gain. Foreign investors’ main concerns are their return on their investment, not on the province’s prosperity. In addition, with foreign buyers and empty buying comes the lack of opportunity and execution of infill.
Planning refers to the efforts put in place to achieve goals that add up to the future (Pfeffer & Sutton, 2006). It is about what is happening today to achieve results and therefore refers to the strengthening of what works while taking informed risks of setting targets. CAMBA’s Park Slope Women MICA Shelter uses performance appraisal tools by way of feedback and making necessary adjustments. They also eliminate programs that do not work. Leaders in non-profit institutions ought to recognize the role of dissident voices by creating environments that fosters innovation through constructive criticism (Nadler, 2004).
If you had been a reformer during this era (remember planning as a profession did not yet exist), what type of progressive era urban reform would you adopt and implement? Why? Would it engage with the good government movement or not? Why? What lessons, if any, would your response then provide for your planning practice today?
The reason why they wanted to do that first is because the government has the power to solve the political and social problems but they believe in order to do that the government itself must be fixed. Even Woodrow Wilson said, “(Our) great Government we loved has too often been made use of for private and selfish purposes, and those who used it had forgotten the people…(Document 2)” Which in this quote represents how the government have been co-otp for selfish purposes rather than using it for the greater good of the people. The progressives believe that applying principles of scientific management would make the government more efficient and that instead of politicians managing a modern city it should be experts. The reason why they believe that politicians are not a great choose to manage a modern city is because they know a little amount about the city’s services.
Growing up, I have always had an interest in geography and thinking about different countries and what makes them the way that they are. I have not been in a geography class since middle school and Human Geography was a class that made me think about things I have never thought of before. The readings of both Kropotkin and Mackinder brought up very interesting points, some that conflict and others that agree. Each author writes in a way that stimulates and makes you think about geography and certain topics in different ways which I find to be very rare in writings from this time period. Discussing Kropotkin’s and Mackinder’s general ideas, points they disagree or agree on, and my own views on the topic will all be discussed in this final paper.
There was a commitment to make changes at the local level to give the people a voice and better living conditions. Making municipal governments more efficient and eliminating political corruption was their goal. They argued against the strong mayor/weak council system and wanted it replaced with a strong council which would more adequately represent the people. By implementing the City Commissioner Plan and the City Manager Plan, experts ran various departments in cities and reported directly to the council.
It creates a balance in regional developments. The planning commission of a country will be able to
In many ways, Blij emphasizes the fact that geography is constantly and drastically changing. Therefore; we must
To find out how a city is actually doing it has to see itself from an outside prospective. They will most of the time see that what they though was normal is actually something they grew accustomed to. A way that can lead to planners being progressive is to use a therapeutic approach. This approach involves “the “whole person” to be present in negotiations and deliberations, but being prepared to acknowledge and deal with the powerful emotions that underpin many planning issues” (Sandercock, 2004).
Maintain status quo. According to a survey of mayors, most of them expressed desire for higher housing values. For them, the ideal neighborhood is “older areas that have maintained housing values.” In light with economic imperatives and logic, mayors need to prioritize economic growth.
Plan Houston go into depth into the twelve strategies. One of strategies that caught my attention is “grow responsibly”, this strategy has the related goal of transportation. I believe that Houston needs more variety of transportation other than traveling with our cars. Citizen participation is one of the goals that Plan Houston tries to achieve. I think citizen participation will help to improve the local government for this city.
Introduction As the world’s population continues to migrate and live in urban areas, planners, engineers, and politicians have an important role to ensure that they are livable and sustainable. But what defines an urban area and what makes it so attractive? In my opinion, urban areas are places that consist of a variety of land uses and buildings, where services and amenities are easily accessible to the general public, and includes an established multimodal transportation network. Also, it should be a place where people can play, learn, work, and grow in a safe and collaborative manner.
There should be a plan for a mix of housing based on current and future demographic trends, market trends and the needs of different groups in the community. Furthermore, there is a need to identify the size, type, tenure and range of housing that is required in particular locations, reflecting local demand and that there should be policies which are sufficiently flexible of the changing market conditions (Affordable housing Supplementary
Incorporating analysis’s from material provide in the Development and the City course at the University of Guelph, it is believed that a significant issues is the means to which governments invests in their people. Within cities, municipal governments are often more interested in modernizing than addressing the major structural concerns mentioned above. Furthermore, social inequalities do not just expand across cities, rather this is a problem that engulf the entire nation, which Boo also points to. This can especially be seen when
Physical geographers apply the positivist approach in trying to understand the physical world. Bennett defines positivism as “a philosophy of meaning, of what you say that something is true, when you offer it as something which others must also accept because it is, according to some allegedly neutral standard true” (2009, 310). In this paper the way in which geographers use the positivist theory to understand the physical world will be discussed along with the advantages and limitations of using this method. There are a host of factors involved in the positivistic approach to physical geography. Physical geography is viewed by many as being hands on work with less theory.