ipl-logo

The Four Dissentinions Of Obergefell

1781 Words8 Pages

The four dissenting opinions in Obergefell give us a fairly good idea of what a majority opinion would look like if issued by a Supreme Court that still hears and orders its thinking based on foundationalism, objective truth and ordered reason. In other words, what the Obergefell decision would look like if written by justices who still hear the echo. It might look something like this:
Marriage, as historically defined in our law and traditions since the founding of this nation and for all of recorded human history, has been understood by the people and supported by the laws of the States as a union between a man and a woman. Even in those cultures which allow polygamous marriage, the heterosexual character of the institution is assumed. Western …show more content…

Therefore, a society has good cause to favor the institution of marriage through appropriate laws establishing and regulating civil marriage so that children, for the most part, are conceived, educated, nurtured and protected by their biological parents. The fact that some married couples are childless or that some children are orphaned or abandoned and must be raised by others does not alter the normalcy or centrality of the nuclear family unit or its importance to the State.
Civil marriage is not a fundamental right of all citizens regardless of gender. Civil marriage other than between a husband and a wife has no historical or legal roots beyond the last few decades. Civil marriage, as a legal institution, does not exist to confer human dignity or give societal approval to the personal love and commitment between two individuals. It is beyond the power and purpose of government to confer such things on its citizens. Personal love and happiness are wonderful things, but they are none of the government’s …show more content…

There is no fundamental constitutional right for two people of the same gender to participate in civil marriage. Civil marriage laws have a clear rational basis as a gender specific institution and serve a legitimate governmental purpose. There is no violation of due process involved when the legal institution of civil marriage reflects the social institution of marriage as it has always been defined for understandable and rational reasons.
The notion that marriage is a discriminatory institution designed to subjugate women is unfounded as a matter of law and seems historically unfounded. While it is true that, before the present age of gender equality, under the law wives usually enjoyed fewer and more limited legal rights than husbands, However, this ignores the substantial legal obligations placed on a husband regarding his wife and the children born to the marriage that only exist because those obligations were imposed by civil marriage

Show More
Related

  • Obergefell V. Hodges: Case Study

    409 Words  | 2 Pages

    Obergefell v. Hodges (2014) The Obergefell v. Hodges (2014) case involved the marriage of same sex couples. Groups of same sex couples sued their state agencies to challenge the constitutionality of them refusing to recognize legal same sex marriages. Plaintiffs argued that the states’ statutes violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.

    Read More

  • Summary: Obergefell V. Hodges

    646 Words  | 3 Pages

    Obergefell v. Hodges is one of the most important Supreme Court rulings to date. This case, by a 5-4 decision, legalized same-sex marriage and established that the 14th amendment, by both the Due Process Clause and Equal Protections Clause, guarantees this right. The Supreme Court for a long time exercised judicial modesty in terms of cases involving same sex marriage by allowing the decisions to be made by the states. However, with some states recognizing same-sex marriages and others not, things began to get complicated when couples would move to other states and not get the same benefits as married couples and other similar situations that caused issues. However, when the Supreme Court took this case and ruled that same-sex marriage was legal in all 50 states, it was a prime example of the court using judicial activism.

    Read More

  • Firing Line By Mrs. Schlafy: Article Analysis

    726 Words  | 3 Pages

    What the law will do is to make wife criminally reliable for the support of her husband, just as husband criminally reliable for the support of his wife.” By providing the case of how the equal rights amendment operate in another state, it definitely proves that the Equal Rights Amendment would take away the right that the women currently have, husband’s obligation to support his wife and household. Women have to earn and spend all of their money to support their children rather than using the husband’s support. Women already have the important duties in the household, such as cleaning the room, cooking the dinner, and spending time with children so having the ERA may

    Read More

  • Obergefell V. Hodges (2015)

    677 Words  | 3 Pages

    This paper focuses on the Supreme Court case Obergefell v. Hodges (2015). This paper will give an overview of the case, the major arguments made by the plaitiffs and the defendents, as well as how the case has affected other rulings. This case has answered many legal questions and will shape any future cases that deal with gay marriage, possibly even equal rights. Deatiled CH: James Obergefell and John Arthur was a same-sex couple and was married on July 11, 2013 on a medical transport plan on the tarmac at the airport in Baltimore, Maryland due to Arthur being unable to move (3,2) .

    Read More

  • Obergefell V. Hodges: Case Study

    1057 Words  | 5 Pages

    In this essay I will prove the point that the case of Loving v. Virginia made it inevitable that the court would eventually rule the way it did in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges. Chief Justice Earl Warren’s opinion on this case was that “Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival… To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State's citizens of liberty without due process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious

    Read More

  • Macalia Dissent Case Summary

    1849 Words  | 8 Pages

    Justice Scalia of the United States Supreme Court produced a dissent after the decision made in Obergefell v. Hodges and expressed his reasons behind what he believed to be an incredibly poor decision made by the Court. In the dissent Scalia explains how the decision could be a threat to the way the American Government works and could have a serious effect on our future. Past decisions made by the Court as well as past interpretations of the Constitution are both a part of Scalia’s argument. These components of his argument all contribute to his overall strategy to in the dissent. To explain his vote against gay marriage, Scalia uses his knowledge of the US system of government and plays on the emotions of the US citizens who have a strong

    Read More

  • Bowers V Hardwick Misguided

    278 Words  | 2 Pages

    When the court examined America’s history, they concluded that American antisodomy laws have not been enforced and did not single out homosexual couples until the 20th century. The court

    Read More

  • Obergefell V. Hodges (2005)

    2137 Words  | 9 Pages

    Hodges (2015) the Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, applying to same-sex couples the same as opposite-sex couples. This case was brought forward by numerous groups of same-sex couples who were suing their relevant state agencies to challenge the constitutionality of those states’ same-sex marriage laws. The Supreme Court found that there is no difference between same-sex marriages and opposite-sex marriages, therefore, the exclusion of same-sex couples from the right to marry violates the Due Process Clause. This is policy making because the Supreme Court forced states to change their laws by deciding that it was against the constitution to not only ban the recognition of same-sex marriages that occurred in states that allowed it, but also making same-sex marriage legal in all states. Government officials even those who do not believe in the law change must abide by it, by allowing same-sex couples their now legal right to be married and receive the benefits that opposite-sex married couples receive; changing the way that citizens and the government interact in societal ways but also financial

    Read More

  • Era Of Cooperative Federalism

    1810 Words  | 8 Pages

    But, as with its Commerce Clause jurisprudence, the Court’s expansive rights jurisprudence may not be taken for granted. Consider the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges case, which legalized same-sex marriage in all states. That decision, undeniably, was an audacious assertion of power by the Supreme Court, one that brought the guillotine down on states’ internal deliberations as to the merits of same-sex marriage. I thus cannot deny that this decision counts in favor of the view that the Court holds a bias toward centralization, but there is another side to this coin, namely, the four impassioned dissenting opinions delivered by the Court. The principal dissent among these decried the Court for “invalidat[ing] the marriage laws of more than half the States” without their assent.

    Read More

  • Obergefell V. Hodges Case In The US

    955 Words  | 4 Pages

    Roberts suggested that, “the fundamental right to marry does not include a right to make a State change its definition of marriage” (Roberts 2). When this Supreme Court decision was made it changed the definition of marriage forever. Never again will marriage be called a union between man and woman, but now it will be called a union between two people. Nowhere in any legal document does it say that the Supreme Court has the power to change the definition of marriage. The Supreme Court over stepped his bounds, which is what Scalia feared would happen when he says that every time a decision like Obergefell is made, that the Court is “reminded of [their] impotence.”

    Read More

  • Texas: Marriage Equality In The United States

    911 Words  | 4 Pages

    The federal judge in San Antonio, Texas, “ruled that Texas ' ban on same-sex marriage violates the U.S. Constitution and demeans the dignity of gay couples "for no legitimate reason." Judge Orlando Garcia then granted two plaintiff couples ' request for an injunction barring the state from enforcing the ban.” (Keen 1) One of the couples sought to be married in Texas while the other couple had already been married in Massachusetts, but desired to be recognized by the state of Texas. In Garcia’s ruling, he states that, “the Texas bans violate the guarantees of due process and equal protection of the U.S. Constitution.”

    Read More

  • Al. V. Hodges Supreme Court Case Study

    2162 Words  | 9 Pages

    In the majority opinion written on the Obergefell et al. v. Hodges Supreme Court case on June 26, 2015, the court decided that states were required to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples as well as recognize such licenses from other states on the basis of the Fourteenth Amendment. This decision held wide ramifications for policy implementation throughout the nation, especially in those states that had not already legalized same-sex marriage. This unilateral action by the federal government created a complicated responsibility for state and local governments to integrate the broad new legal proceedings effectively. The problems that arise in the local governments following such federal decisions challenge the nation’s federalist system,

    Read More

  • Conservative And Liberal View Of Abortion

    1027 Words  | 5 Pages

    Liberals support same-sex marriage and argue that love is grounds enough for marriage, regardless of sexual orientation. Conservatives are usually opposed and often cite religious viewpoints and concerns about the reading of children as the main reasons for their opposition. In the 1970s the court case Baker v. Nelson occurred. It was a case in which the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that a state law limiting marriage to persons of the opposite sex did not violate the U.S. Constitution. On June 26, 2015 the United States Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage in all 50 states.

    Read More

  • Marriage And Family Sociology

    1412 Words  | 6 Pages

    Marriage is an important institution in a society and although there have been changes in the trend of marriage pattern, it is still very clear that marriage still matters. Marriage exists and its main aim is to bring two people together to form a union, where a man and a woman leave their families and join together to become one where they often start their own family. Sociologists are mostly interested in the relationship between marriage and family as they form the key structures in a society. The key interest on the correlation between marriage and family is because marriages are historically regarded as the institutions that create a family while families are on the other hand the very basic unit upon which our societies are founded on.

    Read More

  • Satire On Marriage

    350 Words  | 2 Pages

    Marriage strengthens the family bond, especially when a child is being born into the family. Like the saying goes, “it takes a village to raise a child.” The point mentioned in the video was marriage without consent would only lead to undesirable consequences. If one has decided to settle down with the partner of choice, it is without a doubt that the family will have a say regarding the marriage. One must ensure to be competent in taking care of the partner of choice as the family entrusts the responsibility to the individual.

    Read More

More about The Four Dissentinions Of Obergefell

Open Document