Kirsi Williams Period Three February 8, 2023 The Tyrants of the Colorless Community Though we all dream of a perfect world, achieving such a utopia would require the sacrifice of free will and individuality. Freedom can be dangerous because people make mistakes. When humans are allowed liberty, violence ensues. Even those with the best intentions make errors and hurt others. However, freedom makes life worth living. Choices free us from oppression and give meaning to life. Humans depend upon the freedom to express themselves and to grow. If given no choices, everyone would be lifeless clones programmed to obey every order set forth by their superiors. Lois Lowry set The Giver in a community where no citizen has ever tasted the joy of freedom …show more content…
In the Giver’s quarters, Jonas watches a replay of his father unknowingly murdering an innocent newborn. Jonas witnessed as “...the newchild, no longer crying, moved his arms and legs in a jerking motion. Then he went limp. His head fell to the side, his eyes half open. Then he went still…He killed it! My father killed it!” (Lowry 187-188). Though the Elders claim to have eliminated murder, they have instead woven it into the very basis of their society. The Elders are brutally murdering innocents, and nobody knows it. Release, as shown in the quote above, is how the Elders euphemize murder to justify the deaths of countless innocents. Some may counter this, saying that the Elders have just reasons for Release. However, the Elders’ reasons are truly weak and preposterous. The Elders’ justification of newborns’ murder includes reasons beyond any newborn’s control; sadness, fussiness, and restlessness. Newchildren are expected to never cry, fall asleep instantly, and be the perfect infant, lest they face execution. The Elders also exterminate those who have broken over two of the Community’s strict laws. From a young age, tiny mistakes are punished with the beating of a discipline wand; but once a citizen commits a more serious crime, even accidentally, they are punished more severely. If that citizen messes up two more times, their life is sucked away without a second thought. Furthermore, the Elders steal the lives of …show more content…
For example, North Koreans suffer under the oppression of strict and harsh laws set forth by a dictator. In North Korea, free will and expression are outlawed and punishable by death or imprisonment: “...North Korea, where free speech is outlawed and the state tightly controls all forms of media. Citizens of North Korea have virtually no freedom of speech: internet is only accessible by a select number of powerful individuals in Pyongyang, television and radios can only access North Korean-operated stations, and accessing foreign media is illegal and punishable by death or by imprisonment in political prison camps” (https://www.theworldmind.org/home/2019/4/26/fake-news-in-north-korea-censorship-propaganda-and-the-rewriting-of-history). Censorship and stringent laws restrict freedom, and in doing so, restrict the meaning of life. Many of the wars over the decades have been fought for freedom. If freedom was not absolutely necessary, then a risk as great as war would never have been taken. However, some may argue that the loss of liberty is for the people’s safety. This is inaccurate: Kim Jong-un doesn’t restrict North Korea’s freedom because he believes it is for their good, he restricts it because it secures his power. Kim Jong-un fears that if he is to give his citizens freedom, they will exercise it against the tyrannical government system that oppresses them. Jong-un knows
Release was a method in The Giver through which the community tried to cleansed itself of impurities by killing off the undesirables with a lethal injection. Because of the government's obsession with creating a flawless world, they raised the children from the moment they were born to hold the greater good of society above all else including life. Therefore, the people did not question the idea of killing infants because the child did not meet the standards or disposing of the elderly once they were no longer of use to the
On the surface, it seems as if the ones who walk away are being courageous when in truth they are cowards. Although as Sarah Wyman states nearly all people would focus on the one “incarcerated lost soul” and claim freeing the kid is the more ethical choice than the belief that the needs of the many outweighs the needs of the one. No matter which option, a person chooses, by making a choice they are at least acknowledging the child and it’s suffering. The ones who leave remove themselves from the situation so they do not need to make the decision of whether to help the kid and damn the rest of society or preserve the “prosperity and beauty and delight of Omelas” and keep the status quo regarding the child.
“I ain’t ever been parted with her for two days before,” she said,” (O’Connor 11). The old lady knows that her daughter is not going to come back; she is going to die, and she will never see her again. Even though she knows that by Mr.Shiflet taking her away her daughter is going to get killed, she is still willing to send her off because she knows it will grant her freedom. In order to gain her freedom, she is willing to do something she knows is extremely morally wrong and will likely cause her great pain in the future. In society, the population tends to do a lot of things that they know they shouldn’t be doing and are wrong in order to gain something that they want - such as
The Line Between Euthanasia and Murder Have you ever had to put down an animal? Did you have to think to make sure it was the right decision? Well, in The Giver, the Committee of Elders, who is the governing body in the community, make the laws and the jobs for children who turn twelve. They use euthanasia or as they say, “release” on humans. when a citizen is old, has committed a crime, or even if they are born underweight or with a twin.
In life, knowledge is one of the most important things ever giving us insight into the past so we know what to avoid. In the story, The Giver by Lois Lowry the main character Jonas lives in a world where all the knowledge is held with the Giver. In this world there are many rules, there are no ages, just groups like the 1s, 2s, 3s, and so on. One of these rules is that when you are old enough or if you are a twin or you mess up three times you get released. Releasing when you get euthanasia.
This is when Jonas is exposed to the more gruesome realities of release within the community. Similar to how today we might say “Passed away,” The Giver’s society would use the term “release.” These euphemisms both express a softer effect on the reality of death. Release of the old can also be related to how we may use the phrase “They’re in a better place.” Also the use of using “release” as a punishment is similar to the modern day sentence of death after being convicted of a crime.
Everyone is happy about release because they have no strong feelings. Another way the community's daily lives are different from ours is the people living in the Giver’s society also lead very strict and plain lives. No one can go out after dark; there are very few household items. Page 74 states, “There were the necessary reference volumes that each household contained: a dictionary, and the thick community volume which contained descriptions of every office, factory, building, and committee. And the Book of Rules, of course.
Madeleine L’Engle once said“Because to take away a man's freedom of choice, even his freedom to make the wrong choice, is to manipulate him as though he were a puppet and not a person.” In Lois Lowry’s The Giver a dystopian community, a futuristic reality in which oppressive societal control and illusion of a perfect society is maintained by the government, is stripped of its right to freedom of choice and there is only two people strong enough to take action. The Giver features a so-called perfect community in which poverty, war, and hunger are eliminated. Everyone is content with their lives and when a boy named Jonas receives the honor of becoming the Receiver of Memory he gains wisdom and knowledge through the memories of the past given to him by the Giver. Gradually, Jonas realizes the the false ideals of happiness and goodness throughout the story and in return learns the importance of freedom, choice, and love.
Jonas felt anger for his father and the pain he feels for the baby twin. On page 168 in the giver,Jonas realized that they been playing a game of war ( Lowry). Jonas feel sad and misunderstood for the boy in war. Jonas sadly understood that no one know what he is feeling. These are like real life because some careless people don 't think about others and think that everything is just a joke.
True freedom is commonly defined as absolute choice; whether it is in thought, actions or speech, freedom is an individual’s ability to take control of their lives and enables the human experience. Civilization views freedom as an ideal, yet the means of achieving it and whether or not freedom is truly achieved remains ambiguous. There are often individuals in civilized society who struggle and believe themselves to be free after a hard earned victory against oppression. Yet, the implications of maintaining a civilized social structure upon freedom is often overlooked. Many individuals view themselves as free from a subjective standpoint, although true freedom has an absolute meaning.
In Lois Lowry’s novel The Giver that is the reality. The catch? The catch is freedom. There is no room for being different, no room for spontaneity, no room for experimentation and breaking the rules.
Despite the fact that we endeavor for a utopia, the inability to do so results in our dystopian society. Envision a utopia where famine and war does not exist. This expectation costs multiple inflexible sacrifices to maintain such an infallible society. In The Giver by Lois Lowry, the community is synchronized to sameness daily to maintain humbleness or peace. In spite of that, society's ignorance of the truth keeps them from experiencing life itself.
Throughout The Giver, the process of being release is often used in both a good and bad sense. For example, the community celebrates when an older person is released but saddened when a newborn is. However, when a pilot miscalculates their route and flies over the community causing a small panic, Jonas records the fact that, “needless to say, he will be released” (Lowry 2). This small accident shows the fact of how isolated the community is as they are frightened of their own “military” of a single jet fighter. Later in the book we find out the true meaning of releasement.
One fundamental criticism, and moral dilemma, is that it sanctions an innocent person being punished for the benefit of society. On the other hand, however, Utilitarianism agrees that punishment is to be put into effect only in the event of the violation of a law. Utilitarianism seeks to limit the use of punishment by declaring it justifiable only if it can be shown to foster effectively the good of society. Consequently, the Utilitarian principle is accused of justifying too much. Rawls alludes to a certain institution of punishment referred to as telishment, in which an innocent person is punished in order
(Saxonberg 331) According to, Mc EachErn, North Korea uses particularly cruel repression as a check on ideological decline to keep its hold on power, but it has not shifted to a simple, personalistic rule where repression is the cornerstone of regime