There are several parallels between film and literature. The first parallel that I have chosen in continuity editing. The continuing editing in the literary form allows the writer to construct the story through sentences and changing paragraphs to give the reader a logical clear direction of how the story is growing and developing. In both “Memento Mori” and Memento the Nolan brothers did not use a continuity editing style. In both forms work they jumped into what at times seemed to be illogical and confusing ways for the reader and to the viewer.
Bradbury and Poe both write enticing stories. For Some they would choose the more darker side of literature that is “The Cask of Amontillado.” Others prefer a simpler text with a real world problem imbedded into to the story such as “Chrysalis”. The stark contrast found in both stories cause the atmosphere to change between the readers.
However, sometimes a flashback can upset the rhythm of the story and, therefore, have a negative effect. This is rare, most often a flashback serves a needed purpose by more fully examining a person or situation. Lighting is also a big components to Orson Welles films much of the impression movies leave on viewers are components of lighting perception.
Despite being in English, it is incompressible compared to modern English meaning that it has to be translated to a more modern version of English. Many people have translated the poem, two examples being Seamus Heaney and Burton Raffel. Because they are separate translations, there are slight changes and deviations within the two translations. This can be best seen with the hero Beowulf. Though the two translations have their similarities such as Beowulf being portrayed as courageous and him believing in fate, they differ when it comes to Beowulf’s pridefulness.
Words are not always interpreted by the audience as the speaker had intended. Certain words could have multiple connotations that could change the context of the word from being a praise or a nickname to a slur or an insult. In literature, there are many examples, some controversial, of words not being taken how they are meant or just the use of such words in general. In novels such as The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and Othello, words such as the “Nigger” and “Moor” are used in such fashion to either discriminate, praise, or a blend of the two to make certain characters of color stand out amongst the other characters. The use of words that could bring up a negative connotation such as “Moor” in Othello and “Nigger” in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, should be used in educational facilities to teach students of the past so that the nation and its citizens can move past
Third, they differs on the choice of settings and how it impact to the stories.And lastly, they differ in style of writing and plot development. First, the two authors differ in character development. This element is essential since it provides the reader an implicit or explicit descriptions of all the characters.
And as there are some similarities between the movie and the play, there are also some differences like in their setting. The “O” movie and “Othello” the play portray their main characters in many similarities and differences. For instance, the situation that their main characters are in is basically the same and also, their characteristics but their names are totally different. For instance; in both the
Why do people always say that the book was better than the movie? Film makers tend to get a bad reputation about ruining books by making them into movies. However, that may not always be the case. Some books can be considered to follow the storyline very well, like the in the story The Secret Life of Bee’s. Despite the fact that the Daughters of Mary had no impact in the movie, the film was still a faithful adaptation of the book because of the similarities of Lily’s relationship with August, and the outcome of the altercation with T-Ray.
An adaptation of a story usually accurately portrays the original work but may have its inconsistencies. The short film adaptation of The Lady, or the Tiger? portrays the original story 's characters, setting, conflicts, and plot transitions precisely like how Stockton intended it to be but with its own twist, making the film subconsciously different. The most important and influential adjustment in the movie is the plot transitions, which changes the perspective on how the film and story are viewed. The film has to create their own transitions in because a movie is visual, whereas a reader interprets a story their own way.
The Devil’s Arithmetic Compare/Contrast Essay The Devil’s Arithmetic teaches us many lessons throughout both forms of media. Each form however has a different lesson and develops them in different ways. The book differentiates from the movie in numerous ways. In both the book and the movie there are many similarities, but there are also differences. Each form of media develops their individual themes differently because that makes it easier for the viewers to understand and absorb.
555) When compared to the older book written, Davis does several things to make her book sound different from the others, such as making the main character of the book Bertrande de Rols rather than Coras’s main character, Arnaud or how the relationship of Bertrande and Arnaud was logical. However this makes Davis’s writing sound completely different story than from how Coras wrote his.
It also didn’t happen in the book so I don’t see a reason for it. Now you know why the book and movie of Ender’s Game are so different and why the book is better. The movie adds unnecessary parts to it like ender when Ender had gotten tranquilized. It takes out many important parts in the movie like when Ender goes to salamander army. It even uses some important parts, but switches important things like dialogue, action, and even points of time.
It described everything, the setting and the mood. It had more narration so the reader could understand what is happening. Secondly, the movie. The movie was different than the book. It had some parts that were in the book, but it lacked some details.
The movie point of view was told in third person, while the story was told through Chief point of view and it focused mainly on McMurphy. The movie completely eliminates any of first person perspective that the book had to offer. Chief is only an auxiliary character in the movie, you were able to learn little about his past and personality that shaped the person he became. The book also did allow the audience to get a better understanding of some of the event and situations that lead the characters to the ward in the first place. The book allowed you to better understand and get a better feeling of what was going on.