College athletes take many risks and make personal sacrifices in order to bring in revenue for their school, for this reason, they should be paid employees. The first reason in why college athletes should be paid is that college athletes take many risks. Depending on the scholarship, if an athlete is injured and unable to play they can lose their
However, some people think college athletes should not be paid for many reasons such as, college athletes already receive numerous benefits. Many get scholarships, which help pay for their tuition, books ,dorms, and sporting equipment. According to the NCAA, college athletes often receive grants worth up to 100,000 dollars. They are the first choice for professional leagues, which draft college athletes at a higher rate than overseas or minor leagues. Also they might argue, college athletes should be considered students first, because by receiving direct payment, they would basically be employees or professionals rather than students.
“The highest paid public employee in 40 of the 50 U.S. states is the state university 's head football or basketball coach” (Mitchell & Edelman). These coaches earn so much money and they do put in a lot of work for their teams, but they are not the ones doing the real work. The athletes are the ones out on the field or court playing the game, which is why the players need to be paid as
College Athletes Being Paid College athletes put in more hours than some careers, but should they be turning into employees of the school over students? Paying college athletes would result in a change of how they perform as students. When a college athlete goes to college, they are there primarily as athletes and put their degree on the back-burner. The athletes get their degree paid for by playing for the school. If college athletes were to receive payment, the money would most likely not be spread out evenly among the sports.
One compelling reason why college athletes should not be paid is because college athletes are often given scholarships. Some people may be aware enough to realize that student athletes on athletic scholarships are already being paid. According to the author of Forbes, Pay College Athletes , it states, “Certainly not all student athletes are on scholarships and not all are on full scholarships but the student athletes in the revenue sports are receiving compensation in the form of educational benefits and living expenses.” This evidence means that college athletes on athletic scholarships already receive many paid expenses. Free tuition, room, meal plans and money for books and extra expenses are some things that are covered by athletic scholarships.
College athletes should get payed to play for their university. These athletes are basically being used, because the school makes money from them playing. The average college receives around 95 million dollars per season. During the season athletes do not have time to get a job, and they gotta pay for stuff somehow. If each athlete got $2,000 paid over the course of the semester, this would give them some spending cash and an opportunity to start managing their money.
Are they students or employees? They spend more time with the sport than in school. Student athletes should be acknowledged for their performances. College athletes should be paid to play because they bring money into the school, advertisement, and they perform the same tasks of pros. College kids bring in thousands of dollars every game day.
One student Logan Klaproth believes, “They[student athletes] should be paid because they advertise the sports teams and merchandise for the school yet the athletes are not getting paid a single cent. Furthermore, since they are paying for college at the same time being paid for playing sports would help them pay student loans and their college
On September 5, 2015 Chris Starks was shot down by a classmate. If college athletes were paid Starks would not have had to move to Savannah State and he would have still been alive. Nevertheless, many other authors believe that college athletes should not be paid. For example, Andrew Zimbalist believes that the cost for paying college athletes would be way to high for the universities across America. While this is true Colleges and Universities could start different funding programs to help students get paid.
Exploitation means treating someone unfairly to make money off of them. The NCAA is a business that gets away with exploiting athletes for billions of dollars. The National College Athletic Association makes money because there is a low supply for college level athletes, yet a great demand to see these athletes perform. So the NCAA, in a way monopolized the scant amount of college level athletes. So if you wanted to see a college athlete perform or buy a jersey of your favorite college football player, you are doing so through the NCAA.
Should college athletes be paid? I selected this article because I honestly thought they did get paid and I wanted to read more on the topic. In this essay we will discuss the pros and cons of college athletes getting paid. I am on the pro side of this debate. Here is why.
When Alabama won the 2016 national championship I read a story about how much money the coaches received for winning and the players, well they received shirts and hats. As noted in the readings, many athletes don’t receive a full ride nor every athlete receive an athletic scholarship. I believe if an athlete is a part of an athletic program then they should have everything paid for in terms of room and board, tuition, meal plan, books and even extra money for transportation, hygiene, and entertainment. No player who works for an athletic program averaging 30 hours a week should have student loan debt. I don’t think athletes should get paid because the purpose of college for everyone is to get an education to better your future.
A senior in college sports has no pay rate, and a rookie in professional sports can earn a multi-million dollar contract. The difference can be a one-year gap. College athletes are not allowed to be paid, but receive a scholarship instead. Many college athletes do not put the scholarships to good use, they often end up with low paying jobs after school, and colleges have lots of money to fund pay for athletes. If there is absolutely no way a college athlete can be paid, there are different solutions such as colleges helping students to focus on education more than playing sports.
The names are Division 1, Division 2, and Division 3. According to NCAA.org the NCAA describes Division 1 as “…schools generally have the biggest student bodies, manage the largest athletics budgets and offer the most generous number of scholarships. Schools who are members of the Division I commit to maintaining a high academic standard for student-athletes in addition to a wide range of opportunities for athletic participation.” Universities that are qualified as Division 1 provide homes for their best athletes. These universities make millions off of their top athletes and teams.
Essentially select schools are spending upwards of $150,000 a year, with scholarships, for some players. If a college did decide to play its football players that would be easy right, just pay the players... Well not so much. First of all if you decided to play the football players you would have to pay all the players of what is considered “major sports”. This could cost millions of dollars. For some colleges that would be a pittance but for others it would be financially unstable.