The Grand Debate
The grand debate of whether to pay college athletes continues today. Yet, today there are so many other amenities provided to the athletes that they are practically paid through those.
College coaches receive sky high salaries, the booster clubs donate millions of dollars to the university 's athletic program but those who are actually performing and competing do not get paid. As a former athlete, I do not think college athletes should be paid. Most already have paid tuition and amenities. Plus they get the recognition of being on a collegiate sport team.
The most successful teams are indeed spending more than the rest. For instance, Auburn spends the most expenses on their football team than any other school… EXPENSES: $39,069,676/
…show more content…
It would be unfair to pay college football players and not athletes of other sports especially women’s sports.
In a interview with SEC coaches, we find out their perspectives on whether athletes should be paid to play or not. According to Coach Mark Richt, college football is a big business,
"It 's a big business because there 's a passionate fan base.”
“Some college coaches make as much or more as coaches in the NFL, which begs the age old question: Should college athletes be paid to play?”
"I don 't think we can get into pay for play because if we do then they 're not amateur athletes anymore," Richt said.
“College athletes can receive an athletic scholarship worth anywhere between $20,000 and $50,000 a year. It often includes tuition, room and board, plus books. University of Alabama coach Nick Saban thinks they should get more so athletes leave college truly debt-free.”
"I just think they ought to get whatever it costs to go to school, but I think it has to be a level playing field," Saban said.
“University of Florida Gators coach Will Muschamp
Paying College Athletes There are several reasons why college athletes should receive a form of payment. The athletes always seem to be practicing, which means that they are almost always busy, leaving little time for anything else. Additionally, they have to go to their classes and study in order to participate in that particular sport. In contrast, giving the athletes money could potentially be a bad idea. Some athletes might receive more because their sport may generate more money.
Major college football and basketball programs bring in millions of dollars a year for their university and the NCAA. Many people claim the players are the reason these programs make so much money and should be compensated for their work. At first this seems to be logical, but there are many flaws with paying athletes. However, athletes should be able to pursue business opportunities. College athletes should not be paid for playing sports, but should be able to have an outside income.
Therefore many college athletes are forced to pay out of pocket for certain items not covered on scholarship such as clothes, food, and gas. This is hard for many college athletes since themselves or their parents do not have the money for the extra items. A selected few athletes will get a chance to bring their family out of poverty and make a great living in either the NBA or the NFL. But for the not so lucky ones that end their careers at the collegiate level they should receive some money in order to pay for the expenses that any college student would need to since they do not simply have the time to get a part time job while enrolled in college and participating in their specific sport. The benefits that the players can receive from receiving a salary are endless.
According to Michael Wilbon of ESPN said that the NCAA signed a contract with CBS Sports that spans from 2011-2024 and costed the NCAA $10.8 billion. That contract will pay the NCAA about $830 million dollars per year. So the profit for NCAA is at least $1 billion dollars in a span of 3 weeks of basketball. So where does this money go obviously it goes somewhat to the players but it mainly goes to the university, I think athletes should directly get that money so they can pay for stuff that they need during their time at college. According to Joe Nocera of the New York Times, if college athletes were paid there might be a less likely chance of scandals like the one at Miami University.
Since 2021 the NCCA Ruling allows college athletes to to get paid for their name, image and likeness. The problem I have is that there not paid by their universities or collges but they receive gifts from boosters, make deals with company to use there name and endorse products. So the answer has changed over the decades but still avacading to change the law the only that has allowed college athletes to get paid is california recently . There are numerous reasons why college athletes should be paid for their efforts on the field or court. These include the revenue they generate for their universities and the NCAA, the financial hardships they face, the physical and emotional stress they endure, the need for level playing fields, and representation in decision-making.
Should College Athletes Be Paid? There are college athletes getting paid much much more than the average joe. Why and how do people feel about that? Although many feel that college athletes aren't mature enough to handle money themselves, college athletes should get paid because the athletes put their health and time on the line to play for a school and the school profits off of them in many ways. College athletes should be paid, because they’re putting their body on the line when they’re playing.
College Athletes: Should They Get Paid? The controversial debate on whether or not collegiate athletes should be able to profit from their name, image, and likeness has been going on for as long as the brain can think. Each year, year-round, college athletics generate tens of thousands of dollars for their respective institutions, only for athletes to see none of that money. It is believed by many that the scholarships athletes receive is enough to compensate, along with the presented argument that allowing college athletes to make money makes college athletics political and takes away from integrity of the business. To oppose, not all sports give athletic scholarships, and even when they do, it still isn’t enough to compensate for an athletes’
College athletes are not receiving a physical paycheck; instead they are receiving a scholarship that is worth much
The debate over whether or not college athletes should be paid has really heated up over the past couple of years. Imagine you are a college athlete; your typical daily routine would consist of an early wake up, an early morning practice, classes and tutoring sessions, and another practice or workout. Oh yeah, you have to fit in time for 4-5 meals to maintain energy throughout such an exhausting day. Athletes have to follow this routine all year long making it impossible to obtain a job to earn money. All of this hard work and time leads to success on and off the field but it also leads to enormous profit for the NCAA.
Paying college athletes has been a huge topic over the past few years, athletes are the reason why these colleges are bringing revenue to their programs. Most athletes' goal is to become professional and get paid for what they love doing but a couple of years ago college programs would not allow the athletes to get endorsement deals because it would take revenue out of their programs. College athletes should get paid because of the money they generate for the school and how much they have worked to get where they are. The amount of attention a college program gets when recruiting a top athlete is game-changing.
“College athletes don’t have to worry about student loans, paying for textbooks, the cost of on-campus living, and meal plans” (McCauley). These student athletes are still going to college, hence the name college athletes. They are not professionals, and this is not the big leagues. A scholarship can take care of a big portion of the cost to go to college. Even if it doesn’t cover the whole cost, they are still paying a lot less than a regular student going to college.
College athletes take many risks and make personal sacrifices in order to bring in revenue for their school, for this reason, they should be paid employees. The first reason in why college athletes should be paid is that college athletes take many risks. Depending on the scholarship, if an athlete is injured and unable to play they can lose their
Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.
"Over the last decade, the debate of whether or not college athletes should be paid has intensified, and many athletes, as well as coaches, have begun to advocate for the cause." (TIMES) Tyler Harnett, a writer at the Huffington Post, took his standpoint on the topic in the article "Why College Athletes Should be Paid," which clearly states his claim, college athletes should be paid. Personally, I disagree with Harnett's viewpoint and I don't believe college athletes should be paid due to education, funding, and overall fairness. To summarize Harnett's article, he starts by talking about his opponents and their viewpoints on the situation, "They are already getting a scholarship, don't be greedy."
Although college athletes may be on a scholarship that is paying for their education, they also work countless hours on their craft and make millions for their