The Grand Debate
The grand debate of whether to pay college athletes continues today. Yet, today there are so many other amenities provided to the athletes that they are practically paid through those.
College coaches receive sky high salaries, the booster clubs donate millions of dollars to the university 's athletic program but those who are actually performing and competing do not get paid. As a former athlete, I do not think college athletes should be paid. Most already have paid tuition and amenities. Plus they get the recognition of being on a collegiate sport team.
The most successful teams are indeed spending more than the rest. For instance, Auburn spends the most expenses on their football team than any other school… EXPENSES: $39,069,676/ …show more content…
It would be unfair to pay college football players and not athletes of other sports especially women’s sports.
In a interview with SEC coaches, we find out their perspectives on whether athletes should be paid to play or not. According to Coach Mark Richt, college football is a big business,
"It 's a big business because there 's a passionate fan base.”
“Some college coaches make as much or more as coaches in the NFL, which begs the age old question: Should college athletes be paid to play?”
"I don 't think we can get into pay for play because if we do then they 're not amateur athletes anymore," Richt said.
“College athletes can receive an athletic scholarship worth anywhere between $20,000 and $50,000 a year. It often includes tuition, room and board, plus books. University of Alabama coach Nick Saban thinks they should get more so athletes leave college truly debt-free.”
"I just think they ought to get whatever it costs to go to school, but I think it has to be a level playing field," Saban said.
“University of Florida Gators coach Will Muschamp
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
College athletes who deserve to get paid is simply unfair: “According to those who support the idea of paying student athletes, this is inherently unfair” (Nocera 4). The college athletes are the reason why NCAA is rich with all the money. They do all the work to get the recognition for the brand they stand
Major college football and basketball programs bring in millions of dollars a year for their university and the NCAA. Many people claim the players are the reason these programs make so much money and should be compensated for their work. At first this seems to be logical, but there are many flaws with paying athletes. However, athletes should be able to pursue business opportunities. College athletes should not be paid for playing sports, but should be able to have an outside income.
According to Michael Wilbon of ESPN said that the NCAA signed a contract with CBS Sports that spans from 2011-2024 and costed the NCAA $10.8 billion. That contract will pay the NCAA about $830 million dollars per year. So the profit for NCAA is at least $1 billion dollars in a span of 3 weeks of basketball. So where does this money go obviously it goes somewhat to the players but it mainly goes to the university, I think athletes should directly get that money so they can pay for stuff that they need during their time at college. According to Joe Nocera of the New York Times, if college athletes were paid there might be a less likely chance of scandals like the one at Miami University.
"Over the last decade, the debate of whether or not college athletes should be paid has intensified, and many athletes, as well as coaches, have begun to advocate for the cause." (TIMES) Tyler Harnett, a writer at the Huffington Post, took his standpoint on the topic in the article "Why College Athletes Should be Paid," which clearly states his claim, college athletes should be paid. Personally, I disagree with Harnett's viewpoint and I don't believe college athletes should be paid due to education, funding, and overall fairness. To summarize Harnett's article, he starts by talking about his opponents and their viewpoints on the situation, "They are already getting a scholarship, don't be greedy."
Should College Athletes Be Paid? There are college athletes getting paid much much more than the average joe. Why and how do people feel about that? Although many feel that college athletes aren't mature enough to handle money themselves, college athletes should get paid because the athletes put their health and time on the line to play for a school and the school profits off of them in many ways. College athletes should be paid, because they’re putting their body on the line when they’re playing.
Think about it wouldn 't that be great in college while being able to graduate college debt-free? Well that is what college athletes get,so i don 't think is fair for them to get paid. College athletes should not be paid because they were the ones that signed up to be college athletes. College athletes have a responsibility to represent their college. Which is why college is a place to get degrees not money.
Since 2021 the NCCA Ruling allows college athletes to to get paid for their name, image and likeness. The problem I have is that there not paid by their universities or collges but they receive gifts from boosters, make deals with company to use there name and endorse products. So the answer has changed over the decades but still avacading to change the law the only that has allowed college athletes to get paid is california recently . There are numerous reasons why college athletes should be paid for their efforts on the field or court. These include the revenue they generate for their universities and the NCAA, the financial hardships they face, the physical and emotional stress they endure, the need for level playing fields, and representation in decision-making.
Paying college athletes has been a huge topic over the past few years, athletes are the reason why these colleges are bringing revenue to their programs. Most athletes' goal is to become professional and get paid for what they love doing but a couple of years ago college programs would not allow the athletes to get endorsement deals because it would take revenue out of their programs. College athletes should get paid because of the money they generate for the school and how much they have worked to get where they are. The amount of attention a college program gets when recruiting a top athlete is game-changing.
College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.
Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.
College athletes take many risks and make personal sacrifices in order to bring in revenue for their school, for this reason, they should be paid employees. The first reason in why college athletes should be paid is that college athletes take many risks. Depending on the scholarship, if an athlete is injured and unable to play they can lose their
The million dollar question; should college athletes be paid? This is an immense debate, but if you were to ask me, I would say yes, college athletes should be paid. There are a plethora of reasons why college athletes should get paid. College athletes should get paid because of the amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school. There are a myriad of reasons that people can argue the opposite way, but, the reasons they should get paid definitely outweigh the reasons they shouldn’t get paid.
The debate over whether or not college athletes should be paid has really heated up over the past couple of years. Imagine you are a college athlete; your typical daily routine would consist of an early wake up, an early morning practice, classes and tutoring sessions, and another practice or workout. Oh yeah, you have to fit in time for 4-5 meals to maintain energy throughout such an exhausting day. Athletes have to follow this routine all year long making it impossible to obtain a job to earn money. All of this hard work and time leads to success on and off the field but it also leads to enormous profit for the NCAA.
When people hear about if college athletes should get paid they would say no because they think the athletes would get paid millions of dollars. It is not like that, college athletes would not be paid that high they would only need to be paid so they can live a decent life. They have to balance their lives with school and their sports. College athletes should get paid because The NCCA is billion dollar business and the athletes don’t get any money, athletes spend more hours working for the sport than the average American, it helps athletes manage their money.