Should Public College Campuses Allow Guns? In recent years, there have been many shootings in education institutions like colleges, high schools or universities, making us have discussions on enforcing gun control. Naturally, there are people who oppose the use of guns on college campuses, but there are also people who agree with the use of guns. It’s unfortunate to hear that Texas will be one of eight states to allow the carrying of concealed weapons on public college campuses, joining Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Mississippi among others (Fernandez, Montgomery). There are important reasons why guns should not be allowed on College Campuses.
Therefore, limiting the number of teachers able to carry guns in school lessens public worry. The teachers going crazy with their handguns has now become a huge concern in the public. Even though most people think it is a horrid idea; the reality is, that increased publicity has caused people to react negatively. They need to understand that there is a specialized handler training for those teachers that do carry, in-depth background checks for those individuals and schools could limit the number of teachers with guns. So, honestly, the public needs to research and look into the positive and negative interests of carrying handguns onto public school campuses before they jump to indecisive conclusions.
Concealed Carry on College Campuses Concealed carry on college campuses is an ongoing controversy in today’s society. There are a lot of questions and valid points from both sides of agreement and disagreement. The following essay will answer the readers’ questions about concealed carry and persuade them to agree with the right side. According to Armed Capuses.org, “The overwhelming majority of the 4,400 colleges and universities in the United States prohibit the carrying of firearms on their campuses”. The controversy that surrounds the concealed carry on college campuses vary from negative comments to positive comments.
Given in 2014, there were 52,00 recorded shooting, yet only 1,600 were recorded as self-defense, this leads many people to the idea that self-defense is rarely used (The Truth). Backing [up] that idea up,[is the ______________that] for every criminal killed in self-defense, 34 civilians die(Ingraham). The pro-gun control side also believes concealed carry is not effective [for ________________________] . Concealed carry is when someone is carrying a gun in public, but it is hidden so no one knows. Many are against concealed carry because it would lead to an arms race.
This is majorly due to the lack of the much needed experience and training to maintain their composure and ability to make rational judgments on the course of action to take when attacked. The assumption that students respond appropriately to attacks is somehow untrue. This is because, the lack of training will make them shoot unnecessarily or even shoot their colleagues in the process of shootouts. Therefore, it is evident that allowing gun possession in schools and learning institutions will have little impact in improving safety in schools. A good example of such a case is the Virginia Tech Massacre which took place back in 2007.In this incident, a student opened fire killing thirty-two people and wounded seventeen others in the course of the shooting.
Assuredly, lawbreakers who carry out violent offenses should not relish “revolving door” justice. Jack Hunter, author of How Gun Control Kills, lists various examples of “undoubtedly and dangerously psychotic individuals, such as Newtown killer Adam Lanza and Aurora shooter James Holmes, who should have been institutionalized” (Hunter 2012) proving that it is not the gun’s fault for injuring an individual but the person’s mentality. But there will constantly be people who fall through the cracks. There will consistently be corrupt men among us. Truth be told, they vision gun control laws with the same disregard that they outlook laws against murder.
Those who properly own guns would not be able to defend themselves if a situation came to that point. Making something illegal means that its production will spread into homes of such criminals, thus possibly making weapons less safe. New, stronger gun laws are not the answer. “The problem with such [gun control] laws is that they take away guns from law abiding citizens while would-be criminals ignore them.” (Lott) We need to work on enforcing current gun laws to ensure the safety of others. While there should be a background check, looking at criminal history, history of
In fact, the prospect of guns in the classroom is more likely to cause professors to keep the conversation tepid and avoid certain controversies; everyone else will watch what they say, how they say it and to whom. This would be quite the opposite of the open and transformative exchange that universities have made it their mission to offer. There is a further point. As we saw in the aftermath of the Ferguson and Staten Island police incidents, and earlier with the Occupy Wall Street movement, university campuses are places where political protest takes root. Perhaps colleges are not quite the haven for political protest that they once were -- like, say, in the 1960 's.
I want to kill someone today.” There has to be a person behind the wheel, or behind the firearm. People do drugs or get intoxicated to cloud their judgement. Most sober people would not take a gun to kill a person if it is not out of self-defense, unless they are insane. We have to realize that not all mentally ill people go seek help so there is not a way to keep a gun out of the hands of a crazy person. Just look at California.
Than maybe this massacre would have not occurred. Today anyone can walk to a gun shop and easily buy a weapon with good or bad intentions. These people who decided to commit this cruel act had bad intentions. But what about those people who can just buy it off the street. Maybe this is why guns should be banned altogether.
Even though, guns are allowed in certain places, is almost impossible do not feel threaten by it. How can we tell if the person carry a gun means not harm? I think that many people, including those who are pro guns, will feel uncomfortable as well. Moreover, imagine if someone goes insane and starts shooting in a college campus, how can the police determine who the bad guy is. College
Especially, a gun gives a motivation that results in gun violence. When all guns are banned, suicides and homicides will decrease, young people will not be able to obtain a firearm and be in dangerous situations, and it would lessen many deaths that occur every year. Also, children will have a safer home to live in. If only banning certain guns, other types of firearms will still be used in crimes. Therefore, not just banning certain guns and guns that are technically illegal, but all of
The rate of murder, robbery, and aggravated assault remain very below the national average, and has in a point decreased on college campuses at a faster rate than the national average. The objective of our state legislators should not be arming more individuals, but educating students at a younger age about the dangers of carrying concealed weapons, and need to teach individuals to respect each other. People assume that everyone with a concealed gun permit is well trained not so. Nowadays, Defenders of gun rights usually claim the requirements for concealed carry on campus mean only those interested in self-defense will be able to purchase them legally. Even if guns were ban or at least were difficult to buy, they argue, gunmen would continue to find ways to arm themselves leaving innocent students