Many similarities and differences exists between our state and federal governments, The Federal Government’s foreword states all Federal Government will have total control of justice, safety, and freedom of the entire United States, rather than each state individually. As the history books states, America was founded on a specific type of government termed federalism, defined as its power is divided between the state (local) governments, and the federal government. Every state has its own Constitution, that is derived from the US Constitution. The State Government oversees the duties described within its Constitution, but shall not disagree with any amendment within the United States Constitution. The Federal Government Segway into three
The judicial branch consists of all of the national courts and is responsible for interpreting the laws, punishing criminals and settling disputes between the states. The judicial branch also reviews lower court decisions. These three branches of government are a checks and balance system for each
The U.S. and Military Legal System The United States have rights and freedom protected by the US Constitution known as the Bill of Rights. The legal system is established by federal law and endorsed by the state and local legislatures. All citizens of the United States have the rights and privileges. The 50 states and the District of Columbia can have their own laws and legal system which includes courts, prisons, and law enforcement officers. The United States also has the Civil Court, Criminal Courts, US Court of Appeals, US District Courts, and Supreme Court which is the highest court in the land.
His definition has 3 sections. First, Parliament is the sovereign law-maker, entitled to make and pass any law. Second, the sovereignty of legislation means that no other constitutional body, including the courts, can question it. Third, future parliament can override any laws and repeal any law, giving it absolute sovereignty. The UK has a unitary system of government, which implies any administrative division can exercise power that the central government chooses to delegate.
Judicial actions are often 'swifter' than those of the Parliament,16 so it is more convenient and effective when some laws need immediate fixing. By following the precedent, the court can also save a lot of time. Judges do not have to waste time reconsidering the same problem too much17 and it can also be a guidance for judges so that they do not make unintentional mistakes. However, if one looks at it the other way, it can be considered a drawback. The doctrine of precedent requires all courts to follow previous decisions even though some cases may be decided wrongly.
The Philippine government is presidential, representative and democratic republic. First and foremost, it is a democratic and republican State, as articulated in Article II, Section 1 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution; “… sovereignty resides in the people and all government authority emanates from them. As a democratic state, it is founded on the principles of electing officials that would represent a specific body or group of people. As a republic, the elected officials hold power and the government leaders exercise their power according to the rule of law. As a presidential government, based on the principle of separation of powers, there exist three main departments of the government wherein power is divided equally among them: legislative,
In addition to that, free trade also improves the efficiency of resources as countries can allocate or trade in resources with each other freely. That being the case, countries can exchange and buy raw materials or resources they need easily, which improve production rate as they can focus on making products of their best. Moreover, the high production rate would also improve countries economy and lead to economic development. Economic growth can happen easily as free trade allows people to trade internationally, which means people would have more opportunities to engage in trade rather than solely relies on trade in their domestic area. Lastly, free trade strengthens international relation, making countries cooperate more through common benefit.
(Burns & Grove 2005:23).It is a quantifiable research approach in which raw data are collected and turned into usable information by mathematical manipulation that leads to forward-looking predictions. Statistical comparisons and percentages are common numerical metrics used in quantitative research. One of the main benefits of quantitative research compared with qualitative research is that it is more precise and easy to analyze. Quantitative data also tend to offer a more efficient picture of the results; they are also usually more objective as researchers are not able to manipulate the numbers or scores when the studies are conducted accurately and without bias. Quantitative research is also more efficient to carry out when dealing with a larger sample size.
The disagreement between people can not be agreed because they live together. The only way for a peaceful society is solve people’s problems and conflicts. That is why criminal law is so and criminal law daters people from crime. V.Relationship Between Criminal and International Law “National and international criminal law come together when crimes that violate international rules occurs. Countries must consider the crimes that violate the humanity rights, as well.” Formerly international crimes sometimes considered as a domain of special laws and sometimes considered as a domain of general laws.
External monitor is needed for work process and outcome. After establish the performance measurement, the manager is easy to implement the concepts of management for results. There could achieve greater efficiency. In political aspect, government can ensure political and managerial accountability. It can enhance governance and popular sovereignty.