The revolutionizing changes which India has undergone due to globalization and liberalization has in no manner proved to be effective as far as curbing the caste system is concerned. The caste system forms the substratum for the economic and social framework which determines the life of people in India. Social stratifications in the Indian society occur on the basis of the caste of the family they are born into. It is of extreme significance because it was the root cause for the social differentiation which occurred among the individuals in India and managed to the transcend the existing differences which already existed in the society by virtue of class,religion,region,tribe,gender and language. Though every society has some kind of stratifications, …show more content…
The genesis of the efforts taken to eradicate the caste system by imposition of a legal ban against the practices of caste discrimination and untouchability occurred during the British rule in India by way of the Caste Disabilities Removal Act of 1850.The purpose of the law was to suppress any usage, which inflicts on any person forfeiture of rights or property or affects any right of his inheritance by reason of his renouncing of his religion or exclusion from his religion or caste. Though this Act was passed by the British with the ulterior motive of attracting a section of the society of Indian to convert to Christianity, it did serve as a step in the positive direction. Another pivotal moment was when the Government of India Act of 1935, a legislation which the British had brought into existence to provide the Indian provinces with power for self-rule and also provides the foundation to set up a national federal structure which would incorporate an amalgamation of princely states. The Act brought the term “Schedule
Once the BEIC had control over India, they reshaped the government to better suit their needs. For instance, the BEIC required that natives couldn’t serve in “civil administration till they become Christian,” seeing that “no civil or military servant in India rises to a position of real influence or distinction.” (Document 15) Before the BEIC, India’s government was self-sufficient and flourishing. Laws were passed in response to problems that people were encountering, with the well-being of the people as the key objective. The BEIC was not taking into account the natives.
Most of the governmental systems didn’t help the indians in fact the things Britain put into place for india only made india profitable for britain. While the British believed that they helped India by setting up a government and military system India disagreed. In fact, they believed that britain caused problems in the Indian way of life. An example of this is british imperial rule established the framework for India 's justice system (Lalvani).
They made many changes within the country; Dadabhai Naoroji praises them about in his speech to the London audience in document 18.3. He refers to how the British abolished the religious practice of Sati(when a widow burns herself at her husband's funeral), educated both male and female, gave freedom of rights, and the security of life and prosperity to the people of India. When looking from a British point of view these seem like modern improvements but, actually these were the norms and culture of India. Which Britain had no right to impair. I oppose the harmful, unequal practices, although I believe that India was developed enough to abolish the practices themselve.
Preventing the half castes from getting married and going back to their homes to practice their cultures and speaking their language, it is political globalization. Government took place to prevent history repeat
Essay Outline The human race that inhabited the lands earlier than anyone else, Aboriginals in Canada had conquered many obstacles which got them to what they are today. In the past, Canadian Aboriginals have dealt with many gruesome issues that primarily involved the Canadians opposing them or treating them like ‘‘wards.’’ The Indian Act is a written law which controls the Indian’s lives and it is often amended several times to make Indian lives either peaceful or cruel but especially, cruel. Aboriginals found the Indian Act a massive problem in their lives due to it completely controlling them and how they lived on their reserve.
This separation came from the lack of day and industrial schools being built by the government, meaning that the minor population was forced to travel to residential schools. RESTATE Other negative effects of the Indian Act included gender discrimination, limited to access to the court system and finally
For centuries, the caste system dictated almost every aspect of Hindu life. The caste would eventually split up into upper and lower classes, causing a segregation between both communities. There have been many attempts to get rid of the system, but unfortunately it is still being used in India today. In Document 3, the excerpt from the Mahabharata states “Enjoy the pleasure bestowed on you, and bear the pain on you.” Referring to the caste system, this statement describes the pleasures or the pain that a Hindu receives in their lifetime.
Manifest Destiny was the 19th-century doctrine or belief that the expansion of the US throughout the American continents was both justified and inevitable. Of course there were already Native Americans living in the area. The new people in the U.S. wanted to push the Native Americans out and make room for their new settlements. Not all of the Native Americans were very happy about being pushed out of their homes. The Native Americans were affected greatly by Manifest Destiny.
After the victory over Khmer, the kingdom of Sukhothai was established in the 12th-century, when King Sri Indraditya was the first ruler. The system of government was feudal, in which social status depended on the amount of land owned. However, the king was excluded, as it was believed that the king owned the whole country. Social statuses in the Sukhothai era can be classified as follows; 1. The ruling monarchs and nobilities.
Dr.Lalvani claims that under British rule, India was modernized, giving the foundation for a government that therefore gave law and order. While this system and others were built, they were built almost entirely for British benefit and even profit. In this new government, Indians had no say in the laws being decided by the British, that were impacting them. The laws were meant to further control Indians, while the British extracted India’s wealth and flood India’s markets with textiles with the help of railroads. Wanting more and more wealth, the British logged forests to create land to grow cash crops which in the end degraded the soil making it more difficult for them to grow.
Throughout the rule of the British in India, Europeans mainly controlled the government and police force, leaving the Indians with no voice and no protection. According to Dr. Lalvani, the British established an efficient administration over 500 million people. While this was beneficial to the British, the Indians had no control over the taxations and laws that affected them (Doc. #2). Since all of these laws and taxes were targeted to help the British, India’s freedom was stolen, as shown in the Rowlatt Act, a law that allowed the government to imprison people without trial.
Some might argue that India’s Caste system is closely related to However, Caste and social hierarchy were more different because Caste happens over different lifetimes, and social hierarchy can happen over one. In the caste system people could move their position in their current life, however they could have moved up or down depending on how they acted in their last life. In the Social hierarchy, men could move up or down depending on whom they married, however women could not move throughout the chain. “Women were generally seen as inferior to men, dominated by their bodies rather than their minds.” (McKay pg
Divide n rule / religion The ‘divide and rule’ policy was used by the British, as a mechanism to maintain imperial rule, which gave rise to communalism in the Indian society. The policy identifies pre-existing ethno-religious divisions in society and then manipulates them in order to prevent the subject peoples to unify and challenge the rulers. Through this policy, they were also able to simply create further division among the two main components of the Indian society. Many Historians said that the British adopted this strategy to strengthen the Raj.
Social classes are a form of social stratification that refers to the existence of structured inequalities between individuals and groups in society. A social class is a group of people of comparable status, power and wealth which are usually classified as upper class, middle class, and lower class. For each class, there are some specific opportunities available that influence their social life. We can understand about the particularity of the chances through unequal distribution of these opportunities between individuals in social classes. In here belonging to a social class seems to be an obstacle for some individuals to obtain equal opportunity, unlike upper class people.
Social classes The identity of a social class derives from its relationship to the means of production; Marx describes the social classes in capitalist societies: Proletariat: "the class of modern wage labourers who, having no means of production of their own, are reduced to selling their labour power in order to live". As Andrei Platonov expressed "The working class is my home country and my future is linked with the proletariat. " The capitalist mode of production establishes the conditions enabling the bourgeoisie to exploit the proletariat because the workers' labour generates a surplus value greater than the workers' wages. Bourgeoisie: those who "own the means of production" and buy labour power from the proletariat, thus exploiting