The book The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks is a very touching book to me. This book has really made me think about how patients were treated back then in hospitals. It also has showed me how this book shows of how things were and have changed because of the Henrietta cells. The only thing is that Henrietta did not know that her cells were going into research labs. Since she did not know that they used her cells in research there was no way for her family to try to make money off it to help them finically. Also, the time period plays a huge factor in why her cells were used without her consent. Therefore, this leads me to say that the finance code of ethics, the selling of other people cells, and how your medical records are worth more …show more content…
This case has brought up how much money these companies are making from selling peoples cells. The case is about a guy named John Moore who has leukemia. He goes to the doctor to get his spleen taken out since that is where the leukemia cell keeps growing (ANNAS, 1990). While in surgery the doctor took his spleen out and took the cells from it. He took the cells so he could make a cell line that came from his spleen (ANNAS, 1990). The only problem is the patient never knew that he was going to take the cells and sell them to make profit. Since the doctor took it without him knowing it and since the patient never got any money from the cells it has caused huge debate on whether or not the cells are still property of the person after they leave your body. The court in this case ruled that the patient gets control over his cells and tissues whether they can use them or not (Skloot, 2010). Then the doctor appealed saying this that when they leave your body and are in the hands of the doctor then they own the right of your cells (ANNAS, 1990). This leads to me say that I feel that the cells are each patient’s property unless them give them to some else with consent. In the article written by ANNAS had a guy named Justice Broussard who backed me up by saying that since the patients don’t have a right to their cells when they leave their body and only people that have rights to them are the drug and medical companies (ANNAS, 1190). This just proves that us patients are losing finically since we do not get a cut of the profit these companies and doctors get from our cells in research. It also breaks the fairness principle in the CFP
Unfortunately, because Golde had patented his cells, he could not sell it. (Skloot, 2010)The courts ruled against John, stating that cells procured as a sample is not “stolen” as a patient does not keep the samples for themselves. They did, however, agree that it is a patient ’s right to be informed of a doctor’s intent to do research and what the cells or samples will be used
Dana Garcia Ripley Honors English 2 20 March 2017 Lack of Justice The book The Immortal life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot tells the story of an African American woman named Henrietta Lacks whose cells made one of the greatest medical contributions ever. Henrietta Lacks died of cervical cancer at the age of 31. Cells were taken from her body without her knowledge. Rebecca L. Skloot is a self-employed science writer who specializes in science and medicine.
The Woman who unknowingly changed the world. By: Houston Mullican “The immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks.” A book written by Rebecca Skloot is a book based on the personal and scientific aspect of Henrietta Lacks.
Just about everyone was profiting from HeLa cells except her own family. Throughout the book we can follow the interesting stories of Henrietta’s children and the scientist who worked with HeLa cells. Many ethical questions were raised and we can engage in the argument that the author poses. Is consent from patients’ necessary to proceed with testing on patients who are unaware of the procedures being done on them?
Lacks, was a woman who had her life taken by cancer. However doctors and scientists began to notice that her cells continuously produce (to this day in fact). Henrietta’s family was not informed about her “immortal cells” until 20 years after her death. To all readers disappointment, her family didn’t even get a portion, or even a small percent of the money earned from using her cell line to make various medical advances. These include the polio vaccine, the cancer drug tamoxifen, chemotherapy, gene mapping, in vitro fertilization, and treatments for influenza, leukemia, and Parkinson’s disease (from article).
In Disney princess movies we often find that in order for the viewer to effectively sympathize with and care about the main character, bad things must happen to good people, and these bad things are made as awful as they possibly can be for the viewer to really and truly care for the character. In The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, a biography by Rebecca Skloot, Skloot uses a pathos appeal in order to almost force the reader to sympathize with the characters, namely Deborah. Though Skloot masterfully pulls at the reader’s heartstrings throughout the book, she does so especially when Deborah passes away. The reader find that on the day of Deborah’s death, Sonny had come to check on Deborah, as he always does, to find her with her arms folded
This was the first time that Guy and his research team had come close to being able to grow human cells inside a dish, without them dying off. Guy continued to grow these cells in his lab, still not informing
The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks is at once a biography, a work of science journalism, and a book about the interconnected topics of ethics, justice, and racism. Henrietta Lacks, an African-American woman who died from cervical cancer in 1951, was the source of the so-called HeLa cell line, which is “omnipresent” (Skloot, 2010, p. 24) in modern science. The HeLa cell line was derived from Henrietta Lacks’ cancerous tumor, which, against the wishes of Henrietta’s family was taken from her corpse and has been used for prolific and lucrative medical research for over seven decades (Skloot, 2010). Skloot (2010) described The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks as “a biography of both the cells and the woman they came from—someone’s daughter, wife, and mother” (pp. 25-26). While the HeLa cells are ubiquitous in research, the woman from whom they came is, at best, a footnote in biological or medical textbooks.
Henrietta knew it was hard to take care of a new baby and a daughter that had a baby brain. She accepted the fact that Elsie had to go to the Negro Insane for her own good. Good thing Henrietta did, as things got harder and harder for her after leaving Elsie. Last but not least the Lacks family accepted that they were never going to get money from Henrietta's cells.
However, some may disagree, “Dr. Hagiwara felt his family had an economic interest in the new cell line since he had proposed the project and his mother had provided the original cells” (Andrews). Stating that people’s body parts are apart of their personal property and need to be treated as so. That without the persons who donated the body parts there wouldn’t be any tissues or cells to help aid in research anyways. On the other hand, “Dr. Royston disagreed with Dr. Hagiwara, since he and his colleges had invented the procedure and created the parent cell line that made the production of human monoclonal antibodies possible” (Andrews). In the end, there will always be new and incurable diseases like that of my grandfather’s Parkinson’s.
Maybe if the family wasn 't poor they would have been able to be rich and not have gone through so much about their mother 's cells. Maybe if they had money when Henrietta was alive none of this would 've
Henrietta Lacks was a black tobacco farmer from the south who, in 1950, at the age of 30, she was diagnosed with aggressive cervical cancer. Lacks went to John’s Hopkins medical center for treatment for her cancer. In April of 1951, she underwent surgery to remove the larger tumor on her cervix. Henrietta Lacks, died three days following the surgery. Even though Henrietta Lacks died, her cells from the tumor have lived on and have made a major impact on the biomedical community.
What are the specific issues raised in the book—legally and ethically? Think about the 1980s John Moore case: the appeal court decision and its reversal by the California Supreme Court. Issues that raised in the book are race issues, the legality of taking adventage of patients who’s family aren’t able to fight for the rights and benefit of their cells. According to California supreme court, Under the duty to obtain informed consent, “a doctor must disclose his intent in using a patient for research and economic gain.” 6.
“Was It Illegal for Doctors to Take Cells from Henrietta Lacks Without her Consent?” How can you take cells from a human being and treat them as clothes that you’re just selling. In The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, Rebecca Skloot told the story of the woman behind the famous cell line and the fact that her family did not know about Lacks’ immortal cells until more than 20 years after her death. Some believe it was legal to take Mrs. Lacks cells, while others disagree and say it’s illegal. It was definitely illegal for the doctors and scientist to take Henrietta’s cells without her consent.
The origination of HeLa cells, used in biomedical research for a potential cure for cancer, had made many ground breaking discoveries in science; all thanks to one woman, Mrs. Henrietta Lacks. The history of Mrs. Lacks’s contribution to these studies raised many ethical issues concerning healthcare practice. In the short film, The Way of All Flesh, we learn how these cells were revealed by direct violation of ethical principles. During the 1950s, matters regarding informed consent practices were in their beginning stages of implementation.