Essay: Which of the accounts on the impact of globalization on the state do you find more compelling? Discuss with reference to the case of India.
Globalization in India: Arguments & Counter-Arguments
Since the decade of the 1980’s, the term ‘Globalization’ has been making its presence felt in the academic literature and in the policies of governments across the world. It started in the developed West and then slowly made in-roads into the policies of almost all the countries of the world, so much so that the avowedly communist countries like China and Cuba have also been seen to adjust and re-adjust their national policies accordingly. Globalization refers to a process of interconnectedness between various countries of the world and integration
…show more content…
Moreover, it is also important to keep in mind that, although the economic policy changes may seem huge in India, as compared to many other developing countries that went through an adjustment process, India’s experience is one of gradualism, with the national government very much in charge. Nayar (2003) even concludes that the opening up of India’s economy has not at all compromised its economic autonomy, but has only augmented this. The pressures from the International Financial Institutions were not that much; they were towards an open door; and they were disregarded when they were thought inappropriate (Nayar, 2003: 25). To conclude, the most common approach of political scientists writing about Indian reforms, is to relate their scope and content to political and economic interests. It 8 is argued that the reforms are in the interest of the dominant economic classes, particularly the new business groups, who are politically articulated with the CII as their main organization. International trade agreements, loan conditionalities and ready-made international blueprints are also considered as important pressures explaining the scope and content of the Indian reforms.”
So while the neo-liberal approach of reforms to Indian economy may have gone well with the above mentioned sections of the Indian economy and society, on the other hand, they certainly have not augured well for the Indian medium and small sectors of its economy with huge segments of its population being dependent on agriculture having to face the brunt of this urban-rural divide within the country over the meaning and conception of development in the real sense of a
Once the BEIC had control over India, they reshaped the government to better suit their needs. For instance, the BEIC required that natives couldn’t serve in “civil administration till they become Christian,” seeing that “no civil or military servant in India rises to a position of real influence or distinction.” (Document 15) Before the BEIC, India’s government was self-sufficient and flourishing. Laws were passed in response to problems that people were encountering, with the well-being of the people as the key objective. The BEIC was not taking into account the natives.
One of the critical impacts that affected India was there economics. One
Imperialism had a big impact on the native people of India in the time of 1750-1900. Imperialism is known as the dominance of other nations and/or countries over other places to spread their religion, culture, etc. The weakening of the Mughal Empire had a huge impact over all of India. As well as the British East India dominating a military so strong to take over part of India. With the decline of the Mughal Empire, India struggled to keep out invaders.
1. The title of the article, How India Becomes America, describes the idea of globalization because for India adopted some of the same lifestyles, customs, and ideas as American culture over the past years. Globalization is a process of interaction and integration among the people, companies, and governments of different nations, a process driven by international trade and investment and aided by information technology. The reason for the title is that India has been globalized by many of the same customs as America. 2.
tanks and universities abroad, with the Indian government and think-tanks finding no place for them. The prevalent situation, in some ways, is a throwback to the stifling environs of the licence - permit raj when much of India’s entrepreneurial, scientific and business talent was abroad until liberalisation got it back. We need a strategic liberalisation (opening up of strategic positions in government and in think tanks to cross–cultural talent), to attract such talent back. A good place to begin is the strategic think-tanks in India, which should open up apex positions to the strategic community and academia, and reverse the current trend of think tanks becoming sarkari (government) hotbeds. It is only if the think tanks show the way, can
Statement of Intent: Urvashi Butalia’s article ‘India’s elites have a ferocious sense of entitlement’ published in the ‘New Internationalist magazine’, January 2013 issue, is a critique of the domineering influence by a few rich people over the poor people. But the deep divide of classes is not a good sign for growth and progress in India. This act requires teamwork. My coursework is a letter to the concerns raised by Urvashi Butalia, with an insistence that the duty for change lies as much with the rich classes as with the economically emerging classes of people. “Who in India would have the temerity to study the rich?”
Traditional Indian society had protested when it’s values were threatened, and this first attempt to take back India failed. At this time, all hope for India to have a revival of it’s tradition was lost. The traditional structure of Indian society began to break down, which was replaced with a mix of Indian caste systems and Western social classes. However, not all after effects of the Rebellion were bad. It was the beginning of the policy of consultation with the Indians (Indian Mutiny).
In the era of imperialism, some countries seized the world hegemony by plundering the territories of others countries and developing their own economy and culture aggressively in their colonial countries. As an important fuse, the emergence and development of capitalism had a significant impetus of formation of imperialism. Just as the core-periphery geographical form conveys, these imperialist countries divided the world greedily, and the capitalist classes suppressed the lower classes unfairly in both their own country and colonial countries. Take the Great Britain as an example, since Columbus discovered the new route, the world have become more connected. Gradually, the Atlantic coast of Europe became the world’s major trading centre started
[1] But overall India remained underdeveloped economically; the British economist Angus Maddison argues that “India 's share of the world income went from 27% in 1700 (compared to Europe 's share of 23%) to 3% in 1950” [3]. At the time of India’s independence in 1947, the Indian economy had reached its nadir. When Nehru became India’s 1st Prime Minister,
Many people had different perspectives on what events happened during the imperialism in India. Everyone had a different perspective, depending on what they knew about what the British did during the imperialism. The British helped to civilize India during Imperialism. “They develop the territory by building roads, canals, railways, and telegraphs… establish schools and newspapers”(Document 1).
The term “Globalization” has been in existence for the past 50 years. It is one of the major causes of the increase in international trade. The Oxford Dictionary defined Globalization as “the process by which businesses or other organizations develop international influence or operate on an international scale”. It is a phenomenon that has been in the front burner for several years. Certain individuals opine that it serves as an advantage for the developing countries to compete in the global market while others were of the opinion that it favors the developed countries by making them richer (Giddens, A. 1999).
The exceptionally notoriety of the word 'globalization’ signals a require for caution. The word was barely utilized some time recently the late 1980s, indeed in scholarly circles, but nowadays you can barely open a daily paper without experiencing the term. It might effortlessly show up to is an elegant name utilized to assign wonders around which one has as it were the vaguest thoughts. However to dispose of the concept of globalization, and the huge consideration agreed the marvels it envelops, on such grounds, would be silly. There is a genuine require for a common, non-specific term to portray the complex, multi sided ways in which the world is inter-connected, and progressively so.
Globalization affects economic and political development at large scale Prince Kumar Humber College Abstract This essay discusses the anti-globalization movement that began with the large-scale demonstration. Outlining the ways in which the anti-globalization movement is opposed to economic globalization. This essay discusses some arguments in support of globalization.
The aim of this assessment is to reflect on what I have learned this semester regarding the module of Business in Global Context; from the lectures with the professor, the case studies done in class and the three previous patchworks that we worked on. We have learned that there are different internal and external components that affect the business environment, from corporate social responsibility to cultural and institutional framework; organizations must take into consideration all the factors related to the different parts of its environment. For the topic discussion, I will be discussing globalization and how it has affected the global business environment along with the key aspects and the different point of views regarding it.
IMPACT OF BRITISH WESTERNISATION ON INDIA Srikanth P Y(13BBT0058) Manideep Reddy(13BCE0 ABSTRACT: According to M.N.SRINIVAS westernisation in Indian terms refers to the effect of British culture in the Indian society.