The Morality Of Animal Research

Animal testing is mandatory for human existence. Animal testing helps develop life saving cures, animals also benefit from it, and some products must be tested on animals before they can be released in stores. First,  according to the text, “ Animal research has also contributed to major advances in understanding and treating conditions such as breast cancer, brain injury, childhood leukemia, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis and many others” (Should Animals Be Used 3). These life saving cures and treatments have made life easier. Imagine how many more cures we could have with animal testing.

In the book, “Animal Liberation” the author, Peter Singer, defines “speciesism” and how animals and humans should be considered equally due to the fact that they both feel pleasure and pain. Singer’s focus is more towards the way we should treat animals and feels that they should

Mistreating animals as if one does not care for them is the same as mistreating humans. By mistreating poor doubtless animals it affects them and can sometimes lead into suffering stress. If humans are able to protect each other from harm, then why cannot animals do the same thing by having rights? This question is usefully asked for those who try to protect the rights of animals. In the article Of Primates and Personhood the author Ed Yong, a science journalist, contends, “I feel we should extend rights to a wide range of nonhuman animals… ‘all creatures that can feel pain should have a basic moral status’” (5).

Livestock such as cattle, sheep, goats, chickens, rabbits, and pigs have already been modified in this way to produce several useful proteins and drugs. Pharming is beneficial for people by helping to produce a variety of products that are very difficult to find in nature as well as provide a method

For many decades people have been using animals for research and testing of drugs and various other types of research. The usage of animals in research is necessary to help protect as many people as possible from the possible negative effects of the tested medicines. The use

Animal testing is defined as “the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as food or drugs” (“Animal Testing”). Unfortunately, some cosmetic companies treat animals unethically during testing; this brings into question whether or not the practice of animal testing can be considered ethical, or even necessary, in regards to cosmetic purposes. Those with pro-animal testing views may argue that the practice of testing cosmetics on animals is necessary for human safety, however, with modern advances in technology, there are now more options for alternatives than ever before. With support from major companies and governments, alternatives to animal testing could potentially become the standard in the near future. Those who support animal testing argue that animal testing in cosmetics is necessary to ensure that the product is safe for human use.

It is important to notice that (1) in this article, applying the general idea of utilitarianism which is “the greatest happiness of greatest number” and (2) the animals testing under the rules and regulations. In this paper, under those premise I will argue that animal testing will produce such great benefits for humanity that it is morally acceptable to harm a few animals. In the following, I will structured by providing the clean definition of the key term and explain how great animal testing can contribute to humanity (great utility), in addition with the principle of replaceability to sacrifice animals is acceptable. Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is kind of Consequential theory, which means the moral worth of an action is determined only by the

You may think it depends. But let me tell you a story. When asking experimenters why they experiment on animals, the answer is “because the animals are like us”. But when asking experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, the answer is “because the animals are not like us”. (relate to audience) II.

Although, this isn’t the case because there are laws that regulate how the animal should be cared for such as the Federal Animal Welfare Act. To add to this, not only do animals have to be treated well because of the laws but also because they would make inaccurate results otherwise. Procon.org argues, “stressed or crowded animals produce unreliable research results.” This means that the scientists have no choice but to make sure the animals are well taken care

Animal testing Animal testing is doing experiments on animals to ensure about the side effects of the drugs and how effective it is , this includes the cosmetics for women to prevent any disorders for them and to ensure about the pharmaceutical result of the drug . As estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for "scientific and commercial testing. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses. Research on living animals has been practiced since at least 500 BC". So the issue of animal testing is very controversial, can we imagine ourselves in a small cage being tested on chemicals without knowing the results whether they are going to help or kill us ???