Animal testing is mandatory for human existence. Animal testing helps develop life saving cures, animals also benefit from it, and some products must be tested on animals before they can be released in stores. First, according to the text, “ Animal research has also contributed to major advances in understanding and treating conditions such as breast cancer, brain injury, childhood leukemia, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis and many others” (Should Animals Be Used 3). These life saving cures and treatments have made life easier. Imagine how many more cures we could have with animal testing.
Singer’s focus is more towards the way we should treat animals and feels that they should
Mistreating animals as if one does not care for them is the same as mistreating humans. By mistreating poor doubtless animals it affects them and can sometimes lead into suffering stress. If humans are able to protect each other from harm, then why cannot animals do the same thing by having rights? This question is usefully asked for those who try to protect the rights of animals. In the article Of Primates and Personhood the author Ed Yong, a science journalist, contends, “I feel we should extend rights to a wide range of nonhuman animals… ‘all creatures that can feel pain should have a basic moral status’”
The protein encoded by the transgene is secreted into the animal's milk, eggs, or blood, and then collected and purified. Livestock such as cattle, sheep, goats, chickens, rabbits, and pigs have already been modified in this way to produce several useful proteins and drugs. Pharming is beneficial for people by helping to produce a variety of products that are very difficult to find in nature as well as provide a method
The usage of animals in research is necessary to help protect as many people as possible from the possible negative effects of the tested medicines. The use
Animal testing is defined as “the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as food or drugs” (“Animal Testing”). Unfortunately, some cosmetic companies treat animals unethically during testing; this brings into question whether or not the practice of animal testing can be considered ethical, or even necessary, in regards to cosmetic purposes. Those with pro-animal testing views may argue that the practice of testing cosmetics on animals is necessary for human safety, however, with modern advances in technology, there are now more options for alternatives than ever before. With support from major companies and governments, alternatives to animal testing could potentially become the standard in the near future.
In this paper, under those premise I will argue that animal testing will produce such great benefits for humanity that it is morally acceptable to harm a few animals. In the following, I will structured by providing the clean definition of the key term and explain how great animal testing can contribute to humanity (great utility), in addition with the principle of replaceability to sacrifice animals is acceptable. Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is kind of Consequential theory, which means the moral worth of an action is determined only by the
But let me tell you a story. When asking experimenters why they experiment on animals, the answer is “because the animals are like us”. But when asking experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, the answer is “because the animals are not like us”. (relate to audience) II. So whether animals are like humans or not?
Although, this isn’t the case because there are laws that regulate how the animal should be cared for such as the Federal Animal Welfare Act. To add to this, not only do animals have to be treated well because of the laws but also because they would make inaccurate results otherwise. Procon.org argues, “stressed or crowded animals produce unreliable research results.” This means that the scientists have no choice but to make sure the animals are well taken care
Animal testing Animal testing is doing experiments on animals to ensure about the side effects of the drugs and how effective it is , this includes the cosmetics for women to prevent any disorders for them and to ensure about the pharmaceutical result of the drug . As estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for "scientific and commercial testing. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses. Research on living animals has been practiced since at least 500 BC".
Merriam-Webster defines utilitarianism as “The belief that a morally good action is one that helps the greatest number of people.” That’s right - people. Bentham may advocate for animal rights, but he is not truly a utilitarian because he is not focused on humans and their needs; he is focused on animals. He could, however, be called a utopian. Utopia is defined as “an imaginary place in which the government, laws, and social conditions are perfect” (Merriam-Webster).
In this paper, I will be making an argument about why animal testing is a good thing for humans to have for the sake of products. Animal testing has caused a great relief of pain and suffering to humans. It has been the foundation of humans finding curves for diseases and then being able to treat those diseases. Animal testing makes it possible for humans to develop new drugs and vaccines. Personally, I stand for the use of animal testing as a beneficiary of science and human products.
Although the idea of testing with animals may sound horrible, animal testing is extremely necessary to keep developing new medicines, and treatments. The benefits of animal testing outweigh the cons of hurting animals for our own wellbeing. These benefits include, many long found treatments and cures that has helped many people throughout the years. Animal testing is also the only way that scientists can properly test on. And lastly, whether many people believe it or not it also benefits animals as well.
Since it is more affordable, scientists can spend less money and use the remaining to create more drugs. According to the Argumentative Essay: Animal Testing, "There is a large supply of animals for medical research." This quote portrays that the drugs are tested on more animals, meaning that they will be more reliable. If all the animals do not have negative reactions, then the drug should be safe for human use. If some animals react badly to the drug, scientists will know that it needs to be altered.
In conclusion, animal research is vital to human survival. Although some animal lives may be lost the process I believe that it is worth the risk if it will save someone 's life. In Charlie 's case Algernon was able to show him what will happen to Charlie and even though he was not able to do anything about it, he was able to prepare. Doctors need to test new medications so they can see the effects before harming humans. I believe that new procedures and medications should be tested on animals and that it is worth the risk of death of animals if it will potentially save