ipl-logo

Was Bad Leadership The Key To Imperial Rome's Failure?

331 Words2 Pages

Was bad leadership the key to Imperial Rome's failure? Caligula, Nero and Commodus are examples of why bad leadership was the key to Imperial Rome’s failure. “He had his brother Tiberius put to death without warning, suddenly sending a tribune of soldiers to do the deed; besides driving his father-in-law Slianus to end his life by cutting his throat with a razor.” Caligula killed innocent people for no reason that is not something a good leader of Rome will do to the people of Rome. He beat the soldiers and treated people crulley, that’s not how a leader should treat the people of his country. When you have a bad leader you have a bigger chance of the people turning against the leader himself or the country as a whole. “Nero fastened the guilt

Show More
Related

  • King Nero Research Paper Outline

    1122 Words  | 5 Pages

    Nero’s first five years of ruling were led by his tutors, until he split the senatorial elite and it all went bad from there. Until the death of his mother eliminated a giant restraint “Nero relied largely on Seneca and Burrus for guidance”; he also was good to his people and gave to the poor in his first five years of rule (“Nero” 3). “His growing insecurity” led him to eliminate “rivals and lavish expenditures of his later years led him to” steal property , in the crisis of 68 he failed to realize “he still had the support of his people” at which point in time he lost (Scarre

    Read More

  • Fall Of Rome Dbq Essay

    617 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many Roman emperors only lasted about a year as rulers which led to the Roman people not truly making a connection/bond with the emperor who served which led to

    Read More

  • Fall Of The Roman Empire Dbq Essay

    477 Words  | 2 Pages

    The fall of the Roman Empire, where every leader gets murdered along with the military. Rome was the most powerful empire in the ancient world until it fell. The three primary reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire are weakened military and invasions, too much territory to govern, and faulty leadership. One of the primary reasons why Rome fell was that it suffered from a weakened military and invasions.

    Read More

  • Nero Was Responsible For The Worst Roman Emperors

    756 Words  | 4 Pages

    HISTORY-Nero Emperor Nero Arguably the Worst Emperors of Rome Nero’s life was not the best but he also was not the best person. He also dealt with fires and multiple disasters. He made people listen to him sing, made them suffer being burned at the stake, and more. He is also arguably one of the world’s worst Roman emperors in the entire history of Rome. I say arguably because he also did many things in the beginning of his rein of power like lowering the taxes, plays, and games.

    Read More

  • Was Nero Selfish Or Selfless

    84 Words  | 1 Pages

    Emperor Nero was a very crazed insane Emperor lacking many things during his rule over Rome. The first thing he lacked was sanity. Nero was so crazy that when Rome was burning down to ashes he ran away to play the lyre instead of helping the people escape. Nero also lacked selflessness he was way more selfish than selfless and the reason why is because after the fire in Rome burned down he decided to take everybody's money and spend it on an

    Read More

  • Caligula's Reason Of Madness In The Case Of Caligula

    1066 Words  | 5 Pages

    In contrast to Caligula’s reason of madness in the case of Nero there was no sign of reason only that he as well suffered from a mental ailment in more ways than one the illness was a family trait since, yet Nero’s actions were to differ from Caligula in persecution of Christians, the endless depraved sexual encounters with both gender and lastly the way he governed showed that he loved the arts, and the theater thus giving the history some art works as well for coins. Covering the way his rule was not his own but his mother’s and tutors when they were gone, and he was clear to rule he killed or divorced his wives, but his actions always effected the Roman empire. In particular in 64 A.D, the Great Fire that set Rome ablaze for six days a historian Tacitus the saw four districts of the city burn in stating, “The city four were undamaged, three were destroyed and in the seven

    Read More

  • Fall Of Rome Dbq Essay

    517 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Document A, it shows 19 Roman Emperors in the 50 years of 235-285 CE. Thirteen of the nineteen leaders were assassinated or possibly assassinated. This perhaps is because of weak leadership or only wanting the power for themselves. Citizens were also upset with how the government was not “not possessing the spirit of former generations” and because of this, it was “ruining the state.” (Doc E)

    Read More

  • The Five Good Emperors Of Rome

    190 Words  | 1 Pages

    The first emperor to ever rule Rome was Augustus. Next came the Julio-Claudian Emperors and they ruled after Augustus. Also the emperors were never succeeded by their biological sons or their heirs. Next came the Good Emperors and according to study.com it said “The Five Good Emperors brought relative peace, stability, and prosperity to Rome.” And according to study.com they said “The reign of the Five Good Emperors was characterized by the adopting of one’s heir to the throne, rather than the crown simply going to a biological son or whoever was strong enough to take it.”

    Read More

  • Emperor Nero's Role In History

    1040 Words  | 5 Pages

    Unlike conventional rulers, Nero came from a humble background. He himself was not responsible for becoming a ruler, but his complex familial ties, notably that of his mother, propelled him into political circumstances. Once in power, Nero was initially characterised by generosity, competence, and a seemingly liberal stance, but this quickly declined as his true nature surfaced. From this point onwards, Nero would be remembered for his sheer tyranny, bloodthirst, and corruption. His megalomania can even be compared to dictators centuries later, such as Saddam

    Read More

  • The Leadership Of Brutus In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

    763 Words  | 4 Pages

    To lead means to “be in charge or command of”. To run a large city like Rome, the citizens need someone like Brutus to “take charge” or “command”. To be a good leader means to have courage, integrity, and kindness. Brutus was the most pleasing leader of all the men. He showed great acts of leadership throughout the duration of his life and thought of others rather than himself.

    Read More

  • How Were The Corrupt Rulers During The Pax Romana

    448 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the Pax Romana the Roman Empire grew and prospered. Before this time period of great rulers Rome had a lot of corrupt rulers. There were five incredible emperors known as Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius, and Marcus Aurelius (Spielvogel 292). Trajan was known as the best ruler. He was a successful and powerful leader.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Leader Analysis

    1556 Words  | 7 Pages

    Some flaws can make you a good or a bad leader, depending on how they are used or directed. One of these such traits is ambition. Marc Antony was very ambitious, which could have been very good for him as leader, but he was so ambitious that he killed his own family members. This is very important, because he does this to not anger his fellow rulers of Rome. If someone is willing to kill off their own family, then how can one know they will not kill others to stay in power?

    Read More

  • Roman Values

    921 Words  | 4 Pages

    For example, “ In a city so great and so corrupt Catiline found it a very easy matter to surround himself, as by a bodyguard, with troops of criminals and reprobates of every kind.” This just shows that even though citizens owed Rome loyalty and honesty it was just too corrupt that people had to turn on it. The strength of Rome's relationship with its citizens suffered leaving some of its not so great people to actually side with Catiline only hurting it

    Read More

  • Key Qualities Of Brutus In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

    155 Words  | 1 Pages

    Imagine what it would be like to be betrayed by the people you trust most. Imagine literally being “stabbed in the back” by your closest friends. In Shakespeare’s infamous play Julius Caesar, this indeed does happen; a man by the name of Julius Caesar is assassinated by some of his closest companions. Julius Caesar was a well-renowned leader in real life and in the play. Any ideal leader has key qualities such as being very intelligent, takes charge whenever possible, and is passionate for their country.

    Read More

  • Bad Leaders: The French Revolution

    704 Words  | 3 Pages

    People have a natural urge to want power, and when there are opportunities to seize power, people take them. Throughout history there have been countless civilizations and societies governed by poor and unqualified leaders, that have detrimentally affected the people and the society. It is because of poor leaders that leads to the downfalls of cultures and the loss of countless people. This is exactly what occurred during the French Revolution, many poor leaders lead to the loss of thousands of lives. The weak and insufficient leadership of the french people lead to the reign of terror and more radical actions.

    Read More

More about Was Bad Leadership The Key To Imperial Rome's Failure?

Open Document