This decision created intense debate due to ethical reasons as well as whether or not it would be achievable. (“Ban on Tobacco Ads by the Government of India”, 2010). People who advocated for free choice felt this ban was intrusive on citizens by the state. Other countries had already created similar bans, and Belgium even ruled in 1981 that a ban on tobacco advertising was not unconstitutional. France followed in 1991
The Government of India has wanted to start an anti-Tobacco Program by discouraging young people from smoking. The first step to achieve such program was to ban advertising from Tobacco Companies. This included the advertisement of tobacco products and sponsorship at sports and cultural events. From the ethical standpoint the government felt responsible for the wellbeing of its citizens so it had to come up with a plan or a program to discourage smoking. The government argued that Tobacco was a toxic product which caused death when consumed as the companies intended.
It is an invitation to deceive and impede ourselves, to follow false reasoning and toddlers, insisting that the addicts should die, insisting that they do not need a thorough process because they have just started things that should not be. That if the killings of "drug users and drug pusher" will certainly be addressed by mercenary police and abusive guards. With the mistakes and the burdens of the lives of those who are just bad, it's okay because, the "war on drugs" that the president will enforce is good but the truth is that we just believe that people who are guilty will never change, those people with bad consciences do not need to
It also creates bad self-image and feelings of guilt that can haunt persons throughout their lives. Pornography and hate speech, he claims, cause nowhere near as much harm as political and religious speech. His conclusion is that we do not want to ban these forms of speech and the harm principle, therefore, casts its net too far. Kateb 's solution is to abandon the principle in favor of almost unlimited
The irresponsible people from plastic industry should stop using BPA in the plastic production and should realize the serious consequences of rapid plastic production. For citizens, they have to change their attitudes towards using plastic. In daily life, they can use reusable bottles instead of using plastic bottles, bring recycle bags and say no to plastic bags. With determination and perseverance, the environmental problem can definitely be solved. However, my only disappointment in
Therefore, someone who is hungry will ignite more smoking, in order to withstand hunger. In conclusion smoking should be banned, at least the smoker not smoke in public places . Habit of smoking is a bad habit that may harm smokers and people who are in the vicinity. People who smoke will spending too much money, make secondhand hand smoke and suffer from various diseases .Even death is very close to them. Therefore, if we are still love with ourselves and the people around us, especially with the people who we care, then start from now to stop smoking.
Ultimately, smokers have the freedom to do whatever they want to do with their health, but they are supposed to respect the people who are not smokers. Apart from setting aside smoking places for smokers, this approach is not really practical. In that, the air conditions and heating do not prevent carcinogens well enough since the smoke finds way and drifts into non-designated places. Nonetheless, as long as public smoking is still allowed, this will continue to cause significant problems for the environment. People need to understand that smoking in public place is an act of polluting the air and it damages the health in numerous ways.
Government need to take serious attention to this issue because there are many cases happen which shows around 435000 people dead from use of tobacco. Even though we cannot eliminate this problem, but all we can do is to reduce the risk. For most of us, we will agree that we absolutely need to ban smoking in the public. There are so many reason that relay on this issue but I would highlight several reason such as the fume from a cigarette can affect the smoker’s health, other people and the effect to society and economies.
It big change it’s we all know smoking has a great impact to get more disease especially on human health. We must help them. Help them by the means of orientations of and proper social activity second be a progressive citizen be a good model and a responsible role to the modern generation. Third know for the better think just for the sake of yourself. Smoking should be banned in public nor private spaces since it has effect, on the health of people there are good effects or should I say benefits when we stop using tobacco examples, when you did not take cigarette after 20 minutes, hand foot temperature and your “BP” blood pressure becomes normal 1 day after the last cigarette the last cigarette the risk of heart attack and stroke will reduce.
Governments want to protect their citizens as much as possible. In this case India had decided to tackle a potential health nightmare, tobacco. They created a bill to fully ban the advertising of tobacco companies for sponsoring sports and culture events. On the surface the idea came from good intentions. After all tobacco products have a long history of causing health problems in users.