Hello,
Change slide
Pierre and I will be arguing in favour of the statement: Banking and international capital movement should be strictly regulated. I’ll be mainly focusing on banking regulation. In specific I’ll discuss the uniqueness of the banking sector, the representation hypothesis, social externalities, moral hazard and the failure of deregulation.
Change slide
We seek to regulate the banking sector, more strictly than we do almost any other industry because it is simultaneously vital to the global economy and susceptible to systemic failure arising from the interconnectedness of its individual banks.
Banks allow borrowers and investors to form links through transactions from around the world, facilitating the transfer of money from
…show more content…
When one person is making a decision from which the fallout will only, or largely, affect someone else there is the potential for moral hazard. In banking, an example of moral hazard is when a bank invests depositors’ money in a way that they would be less inclined to do if it was their own money, due to the risk involved. Some regulations that help to reduce the risk of bank failure in other ways actually increase the risk of moral hazard occurring. The government guarantee of deposits is such a regulation. Under a government guarantee of deposits the bank knows that not only is the money they’re risking not their own, but also that if they do lose the money the government will cover either all or a portion of the loss depending on the details of the particular …show more content…
If a bank invests heavily in one asset, they might make very large profits or losses depending on how the asset performs. If a bank invests in several different asset classes, then if one asset delivers a loss, it will hopefully be offset to some extent by an asset that delivers a profit. By limiting how much a bank can invest in a single investment, asset-class restrictions encourage a bank to diversify its portfolio.
Risk-based deposit insurance works similarly to how car insurance works. With car insurance, a driver is deemed to be at higher risk of being in an accident for various reasons from their age to whether they have previously been in an accident. Their premium is higher if they are deemed to be at a higher risk of being in an accident. Similarly, under risk-based deposit insurance, a bank pays a higher premium if they are deemed to be at higher risk of losing their depositor’s money.
Change
The FDIC protected the deposits of individuals at banks by insuring up to 2,500 dollars of their deposit. This policy, along with other efforts to mend the faults in the banking system, were established in the banks across the country. By doing this, bank closures that had become extraordinarily prevalent in the early 1930’s were almost nonexistent in 1934 and beyond; many financial institutions during the Roaring 20’s invested money in unstable stocks in hopes of making significant gains, and this played a major role in the bank failures following the stock market crash. By restricting the banks and requiring them to insure the deposits of American citizens, the FDIC was successful in making the banking systems of America safer and more
He then points out that Germany and the United States of America has been creating restrictions on their trading limiting what used to very expansive and lubricative trading markets. To further cement his argument,
According to FDIC.gov “An average of more than 600 banks per year failed between 1921 and 1929”. This led to millions of people losing the money they put into bank accounts, for some it was their entire life’s saving. It was this lack of security in deposits that led to the establishment of the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation). This program let the public have security when investing money in the banks by having bank deposits insured, not only was the FDIC successful in the 1930’s but it is also hugely successful today, almost every bank in America is FDIC insured.
Depositors lost all the money stored in that bank. Because of this, consumers spent small amounts of money, which threatened many businesses. Meanwhile, farmers and factories were responsible for the overproduction of goods. Customers’ money was lost
The national bank was a system conceived to supposedly centralize a prominent economic system. Although this system seemed only beneficial to wealthy citizens and not the regular citizens. In the President Jackson's Veto Message Regarding the Bank of the United States (1832) document it states that “every man is equally entitled to protection by law; but when the laws undertake to... to make the rich richer and the potent more powerful, the humble members of society-the farmers, mechanics, and laborers-who have neither the time nor the means of securing like favors to themselves, have a right to complain of the injustice of their Government.” This demonstrates how the rich manipulate the government for their own purposes, but this shouldn’t be the case. Instead of a society that manipulates the government, there should be a society that everyone is equal under the law.
It is not our own citizens only who are to receive the bounty of our Govemment. More than eight millions of the stock of this bank are held by foreigners.”
This information and the facts just shows how the regulations today still are not strict enough to prevent another financial
Some people are at a ton of risk, such as being old or having a history of poor health. These people in poor health are more expensive to cover simply because they hold more risk for the insurance company as they require more
He believes that “too-big-to-fail” banks are too big and too risky. After watching the Inside Job documentary, I can understand why he would feel this way. He also voices concerns about corrupting of the banking industry and the threat it poses to democracy. While in a way I feel this is an overstatement, I can still see why he would feel this way. If a monopolized bank failed, it could be devastating (Eskow).
The banks are runned and controlled by foreigners and rich Americans, not the american people like it should be. In response to Andrew Jackson attacking the banks, Daniel Webster delivered a message to Jackson. Daniel Webster didn’t like the fact Jackson was going to fix the banks which would in return stop making the rich richer. (Document G) Webster was only interested in the banks and argues that liberty is in danger whereas Jackson was interested in his nation and his
This bank could also help benefit the government to use it
Insurance companies are making a huge amount of profit. The profit that these
6.1.6 1. The centerpiece of the U.S. economy is its banking system. A. Banks in the U.S. practice fractional reserve banking. Explain what this means. (4 points)
The bank is fair and will give certain amounts of your money at a time. The more you take out/use up the less you have. Just like in freedom the more you disrespect your freedom the less you have. Just like in the real world where you can do and say what you want as long as it will not hurt or negatively affect the country in any way. My ideal government would one of the people for the people.