Racial slurs are a big problem in books because some words can be very offensive to many different races. Racist statements are never okay, no matter what the context is. One more major reason for banning books is violence (Common Reasons For Banning Books). Violence is something that children should not be exposed to if at all possible. Children need to learn that violence is never the answer, and showing them that content might result in the students thinking that violence is cool.
Is today’s youth truly benefiting from school curriculums banning books? For many parents there kids innocence is more than often a top priority, but due to the growing public more and more are being exposed to explicit content. Through ideas such as the internet and other media, it has become increasingly easy to obtain this content. However, this does not mean that being able to obtain this content should be available everywhere. Although the novel In Cold Blood written by Truman Capote accurately portrays present day investigations on murder, it should be banned from school curriculums for young teens because of its explicit content.
Is banning books the best idea? Banning books limits children’s reading interest, including religiously. The banning of textbooks with religion in them shows this, the fact that literature helps young people feel as if they are not alone in the world helps with reading interest, as does the fact that literature can help provide a neutral way to start a conversation. Parents shouldn’t be allowed to take away children’s availability to read a certain book just because they don’t want their kid reading a book. Reading creates a virtual reality for kids, and just because you may not like something does not give you the right to take it away from everyone.
This causes library, teacher, group, or bookstore to consider banning books because of possible concerns. But, this does not only take away the book for one group of people, it takes the book away from everyone, even those who would benefit from reading it. Banning books is bad because banning violates people's civil rights, limits the opportunity for adolescents to learn vicariously, and reduces the readers exposure to
The novel “To Kill A Mockingbird” by Harper Lee demonstrates examples of social drama, courtroom drama, and southern drama. Scout and Jem experience their childhood innocence become vulnerable as they begin to be exposed to the evil side of human nature due to numerous incidents. “To Kill A Mockingbird” is a very popular required read among American high school students because it contains several important themes that relate to issues in the American culture today. Some of the influential themes in “To Kill A Mockingbird” include the importance of morals and ethics and the concurrence of good and evil. The importance of morals and ethics in “To Kill A Mockingbird” is displayed through a court case over the issue of a fair trial.
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn should be banned from schools because it has bad language, alcoholism, violence, lying, and breaking the law. The novel’s protagonist is a young boy who causes a lot of trouble and sets a bad example for other students reading. If this novel continues to be taught at schools it could confuse the reader in knowing what is right and wrong in real
However, many of those same books teach important life lessons and represent freedom of speech. Many people believe that banning books goes against their 1st Amendment right. These books can teach life lessons to students. On the other hand, students should not be around explicit content and profanity especially in books. Banning books could lead to a different future.
Some people believe books should not be banned in schools and libraries because taking away the First Amendment right, by banning books is not right. First, the freedom of speech and press is taken away when books are banned. To begin, “When librarians and teachers reject works that may be ‘emotionally inappropriate’ for children, they’re adhering to the traditional and mostly prevailing view that children’s literature should avoid controversial topics,” (Ringel). Keeping children from using their voice
School prayer is illegal, so having a school officiated prayer can lead to fines and other litigation. Not everyone agrees that school prayer should be banned however. Some say that banning prayer is illegal. They claim that, thanks to the first amendment, that prayer being banned is a violation of religious rights. Of course, banning prayer is illegal, which is why prayer is not banned, but prayer led by school officials or prayers officiated by the school are.
If a student was read a Miranda type warning it would just further fluster them and escalate the situation. Since the student is not being arrested, they should not be read their Miranda Rights. In addition, the principal does not have the authority to read these rights to a student. A student should not be read their Miranda Rights during the time of questioning over a disciplinary