Advantages And Disadvantages Of Post-Colonial Metropoles

Anxieties have been articulated concerning the practice of imposing unsuitable conflict resolution practices on Native peoples over the years. The worldviews that motivate Western and Native philosophies are unambiguously diverse from one another. For instance, Native methods to addressing conflict are more precisely labelled as conflict alteration in that they pursue to address the conflict in ways that reconcile relations and reinstate accord to the group. In dissimilarity, Western conflict resolution approaches prioritize attaining a covenant amongst individual parties over fixing relations that have been hurt by the conflict (Ibid).
Ramoupie further asserts that all human endeavours are moulded by the philosophy within which they are ratified.

These were the sustenance of language and ethnic empathies erected over years of unequalled power, geo-strategic benefits, and economic abuse of the post-colonial state. These three elements establish the trinity of welfares that reinforce relations amongst the metropole and its post-colonial dependences. On the portion of the post-colonial state, the state, with its contrasting native militaries, must yield itself to this overthrow. In return, it is guaranteed of defense and legality.
The metropole plays the part of a pledge agent and the backer of last option for its associates. The substance of French dominance in post-colonial Africa, even in the post-Cold War era, remains unaffected, notwithstanding the changed setting of the post-colonial states. This policy is demonstrated in French brawls in the battle in most Francophone states. Hari (2007:345) asserts that for forty years the French government has been fighting a secret war in Africa, concealed not only from its persons, but from the world. It has led the French to killing populists, install tyrant after tyrant – and to finance and spark the most spiteful slaughter since the Nazis. The war replicates the authoritative for a metropolitan control to continue governments that are agreeable to control in its numerous post-colonial

The new plans respond to the realism that government changes are unavoidable and suggest power changes from old to new associates. The strategy seems to weaken governments with fundamental alignments and connect militaries who guarantee the sustained control of the ex-colonial influence. In light of the above we ought to draw lessons from ‘Conflict Resolution and Peace Building’ initiatives from Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka is making solemn efforts at resolving a conflict that has ascended from the strains of one cultural community, the Tamils for equivalent privileges and the unceasing abandonment of the hindrances of the Tamil persons by all administrations since Freedom. In his address in New York on 20 September 2004, President Chandrika of Sri Lanka highlighted that “the conflict in Sri Lanka deteriorated to the point of armed confrontation to the State, since the prearranged attacks against blameless Tamil people and their belongings, performed by one specific administration twenty-one years ago, in July 1983. In resolving these matters, the government of Sri Lanka has endeavoured since 1994 to accept a new plan and radically dissimilar arrogances in the resolution of their challenges (Chandrika,