In each trial of the study, only one real participant was involved with six to eight confederates, which the naïve participant was unaware of. The participants were told to choose the wrong line as a match for the standard line and to give their answers before the real participant responds. 76 percent of the real participants tested had conformed, at least once, to the false answers that Asch’s assistants gave. Overall these participants conformed 37 percent of the time. 25 percent never yielded to the group pressure due to individual differences.
Nathan not only sees the conformity established in the clothes that the students wear, but also in the way the students think and act in a group setting. The author states that, “Despite our celebrated freedom to choose, we seem to choose the same things, and those “free” choices are badges of our belonging” (Nathan 143). Throughout childhood proceeding into adults, an individual is exposed to “peer groups” that shape the persons attitude and behavior. The textbook states, “Individuals must earn their acceptance with their peers by conforming to a given group’s norms, attitudes, speech patterns, and dress codes. When we conform to our peer group’s expectations, we are rewarded; if we do not conform, we may be ridiculed or even expelled from the group” (Kendall 79).
Conformity is, in simplified terms, the tendency to modify ones’ own belief and judgement due to group pressure and follow social norms, as cited by Garton and Fletcher. This change is in response to real or imagined (involving the pressure of social norms / expectations) group pressure. The person follows the majority or crowd because they do not want to stand out and be the inferior or “weird” one in a particular social or cultural group. Conformity is mostly studied in social psychology, as it involves both individuals and the people around who influence them. One of the most famous conformity research studies are Solomon Asch’s experiment on conformity which was carried out in the 1950s.
We have all encountered social conformity in life, whether it has been consciously or unconsciously, by accepting the dominant culture’s expectation of us. What people say and how they behave are vastly influenced by others.” She touches on
Children develop relationships with people outside of their families and learn how to expand their social life by means of: Environmental effects where they discover their identities through others of the same sex and age to prevent incongruence that may result in conflict. Child growing up with a specific mind-set regarding a specific age group and the roles they are expected to play. Role model: the children are preferred to be of the same age in order to improve learning and better understanding. Race and culture: children are not born with stereotypical views. They learn them from family, role models and the media.
While the organization has some issues, the actual experiment does not get any better. Social conditions play a huge role in determining how one does or does not conform and to what degree. There are various factors that Ash should have taken into account such as how a subject is raised and who the subject surrounds himself with. If it is human nature to conform, the results of his experiment were incorrect because not all of his subjects conformed to the norm. Even the stubbornness or the wish to stand out could play a role in how well someone will conform.
Social groups have specific characteristic; they consist of two or more people who interact in an ordered fashion, share specific values and norms and have at least some sense of unity and common goals. One of the main influence that groups exercise over their members lives in their capacity to induce conformity the process through which modify their behavior to comply with the groups norm or decision. In this essay, we discuss some of the group conformity related experiments and their reflection in society. The Stanford Prison Experiment was a landmark psychological study of the human response to captivity, in particular to the real word circumstances of prison life. It was conducted by in 1971 by Philip Zimbardo of Stanford University.
Conformity Essay The nature of conformity is following something without rejection, or accepting that there’s only one way one thing can be done. Leonard Mead is in a world where society is more like a blinded monkey with a knife in its hand. He is a nonconformist because he doesn’t live the normal lifestyle the rest of society lives. The rest of society repeats the same thing over and over without question, it’s like everyone is the same person. The rest of society’s relation to conformity is that they follow the norms and not question its impact on their daily life, whereas Leonard Mead doesn’t question the norms, he just does is his norms which is totally different from the rest of society’s but repeats them.
He also asked psychology students, they believed less than 1% would conform. To begin with, the participants met with the experimenter who was wearing a white lab coat and a man called Mr. Wallace who the participants believed to be another participant but Mr. Wallace
There are many standards defining and measuring a culture, some of these are obvious from one culture to another and others need some analysis before recognizing them. Two of these traits are collectivism and individualism, which differ greatly from country to country and culture to culture. In addition to defining those, the possibility of coexistence of the two traits will be examined. First, collectivism simply defined is the idea of everyone being a part of a larger group and all behavior stemming from this. More specifically, collectivism includes looking at the needs of those in your group before looking at your own, readiness to cooperate with your group, shared beliefs, and happiness based on the welfare of those around you.