The passage above demonstrates Cummins appealing to the Duke’s sympathy by emphasizing that this situation is going on in his native city, and implores him to ignore the official etiquette and to honour the British name through his actions.
In order to understand the importance of Cummins’ letter, and its significance towards making a change, it is important to first establish a chronological timeline of the events that took place. Since the end of the 18th century, most of the Irish rural population relied on potato growth. Although famines were not uncommon in Ireland during the 19th century, the one in 1846-1847, which Cummins spoke of, was the most devastating because of the number of deaths and the number of people who migrated to America as a result. Deaths were so common and so numerous that coffins had to be re-used because there weren’t enough.
Similarly, Ireland had suffered a potato crop failure in 1816, which only worsened in 1817 as a result of the spread of typhus, a disease unfamiliar to scientists during that time. At around the same time, between 1812 and 1818, Sir Robert Peel had become the Chief Secretary of Ireland. He believed that the anguish expressed by the Irish was being exaggerated; therefore he paid
…show more content…
The poem, “Modest Proposal” was written as an ironic piece to demonstrate the misfortune that Ireland experienced. The poem was a mockery of the way the situation was handled in Ireland, as it suggested that people should have children in order to cook them a year later or to sell them to others so they may be able to feed themselves, thus avoiding abortions. The poem even included recipes and jokes that one year olds can be stewed baked, roasted or boiled. It suggested that since parents were unable to feed their children, the children may be useful in feeding the parents; his ironic words were as
Reader Response of Chapter 2 of A Different Mirror: A History of Multicultural America by Ronald Takaki In the book, A Different Mirror: A History of Multicultural America, Ronald Takaki gives an anecdote about how the lives of both the Indians and the Irish were dramatically destroyed and how they were even almost extinct because of the violent and corrupted acts of the English. Moreover, the English expansion led to the “making of an English-American identity based on race” (Takaki 26). Furthermore, the Irish were the first people to be considered as savages. The English felt as if the Irish did not have any respectful manners or obedience to God.
(Foreword to the Fourth Edition, Joseph J. Ellis, xi). Morgan explains the colonists as a “quarrelsome, litigious, and divisive lot” (Morgan, 5). He also describes
Through Young’s article on a poor Cordwainer living through the formative years of the American Revolution, we gain a unique glimpse into the extraordinary times that shaped both one man’s experiences and the historical narrative of a nation for generations to come. Young uses both primary and secondary sources to present a coherent picture of the events that transpired as they relate to one person and a nation at large. He draws heavily from two biographies written during Hewes’ time. One written by James Hawkes in 1834 and the other by Benjamin Bussey Thatcher in 1835. Both of these biographies are based on direct interviews of Hewes himself.
Many Irish families then came to America for a better future, and to ensure that they will not get sick and die. Not only they came to America for the safety of their families, but also for better jobs and earn money. After the potato famine, many families starved to death or were helpless because
Explanations of the American Revolution are extracted from the real life accounts of individuals who were directly involved in the activities that took place during this period. One of the Key authors focused in the essay is Mary Jemison, a white woman married into the American Indian tribe of Seneca. She lived the better part of her life alongside the Seneca community and endured a multitude of experiences that enabled her to write about her compelling account of the American Revolution from the year 1775-1779. Indian tribes lived in harmony along the whites, who were the Colonialists and the Americans. During the time of writing of the accounts, most of the States were under colonial rule, but the grip that the colonialists had on the people was sleeping away as rebel groups formed to fight off the oppressive reign of the colonialists.
Topic of interest: The role of Irish Gaelic people immigrant in the Civil War and the proceeding rioting. Did the slipstream riots negate the impact of the simulation and acceptance that Irish immigrants gained through their overhaul in the Civil War? Thousands of Irish enlisted in the Unification Regular army at the spurring of Bishops and to express their support for the Union cause. All-Irish “heritage units” were crucial to the Seven Sidereal Day Battles, Chancellorsville, and Gettysburg. Also in helping the establishment of the “Americanism” and simulation of Irish immigrants.
A) During the British conquering of Ireland in the 1570s and 1580s, “many English soldiers developed in Ireland a sneering contempt for the ‘savage’ natives, an attitude that they brought with them to the New World.” Such an attitude materialized in the use of “Irish tactics” by the British where “Elizabeth’s troops crushed the Irish uprising with terrible ferocity, inflicting unspeakable atrocities upon the native Irish people.” Indeed, one of such English soldiers included Captain De La Warr, who, unlike his predecessor, Captain John Smith, treated the Native Americans terribly just as he did the Irish, “raid(ing) Indian villages, burn(ing) houses, confiscat(ing) provisions, and torch(ing) cornfields.” Such a Native American policy led to
“By 1840 the potato had become the sole food of one third of the of the people and an essential element in the diet of many more” (Williams 1996, p. 17). When the blight struck, hundreds of thousands died of starvation between 1845 and 1848. The Irish were in a state of panic and hopelessness. During 1845 and 1851, it is estimated that around 1.6 million people left Ireland for America. As Williams eloquently states, arriving in America, the Irish immigrants had to adjust to their new country and Americans had to adjust to their new fellow citizens.
In John Downe’s letter to his wife about emigrating to the United States, he uses personal anecdotes to appeal to ethos and logos, subjective diction to appeal to pathos, and comparative devices to contrast the United States and England. In his letter, Downe refers to his personal experiences in America to add credibility to his attempts to convince his wife. “... they had on the table pudding, pyes, and fruit of all kind that was in season, and preserves, pickles, vegetables, meat, and everything that a person could wish…,” using a personal anecdote, he tries to sway his wife into believing that every family in America is this fortunate. It’s established that he was poor prior to moving to America, so he speaks of trips to the American markets like, “I can have 100 lbs.
This week we discussed ‘“The Tempest” in the Wilderness: A Tale of Two Frontiers’ by Ronald Takaki. In this article, the author discusses the differences between savagery and civilization. The main argument in this argument is shown in the form of examples of how the Indians and Irish were simply harmless at first when discovering the New World, but quickly made into monsters by the English men. I’m sure we’ve all learned in history of John Smith’s description of how the Powhatans cared for the sick and dying English men.
William Moraley’s failure in the American colonies was not due to laziness but being at the wrong place at the wrong time. His hard work and motivation to better his life just didn’t work in his favor. Even before his journey to America, Moraley had a string of bad luck. After his father’s death, he quarreled with his mother for his rightful fortune. But unable to acquire these funds he was reduced to poverty.
Andrew Gendel Professor Coburn History 17A 22 October 2015 Response Paper Chapter eight in the book, Voices Of Freedom, we read into the years of 1790 through 1815. In the coming chapters we learn about the French Revolution (1792-93), but also skim past Judith Murray and the equality of sexes, George Washington’s farewell address, George Tucker on Gabriel’s rebellion, Mercy Otis Warren on religion and Virtue (1805), Tecumseh on Indians and lands (1810), Felix Grundy, and Battle Cry of the War Hawks (1811). Although chapter eight follows the process of the republic and securing it I find that through this chapter an argument that is most presented in chapter eight is that of Indian rights in the New America, the rise of colonization and the amelioration of Native ways. Tecumseh was a chief who refused to sign the Treaty of Greenville
During the 18th century, America was colonized by several different countries from Europe; the society was different and so was the people. In the essay, Letters from an American Farmer, which was written by J. Hector St. John de Crevecoeur, builded an argument about the colonial American society. By using rhetorical strategies as well as appealing to the reader's’ emotion, Crevecoeur presented an organized essay to persuade his audience that the America was better than Europe. Crevecoeur started his essay with a series of rhetorical questions in order to compare and contrast between America and Europe.
In these letters De Crevecoeur addresses how America is a new type of person. This new type of person De Crevecoeur refers to are the individuals who came to America during the frontier. These individuals came from all over and hold different beliefs. De Crevecoeur finds that “Diverse nationalities and faiths, he said, might well ‘melt’ into a more peaceful, justice-loving, and prosperous original, and it should be the envy of the world” (Horwitz 23). The frontier brought about a whole new race of individuals who could bring a whole new perspective.
Because Hugh is a teacher at the hedge school, it is his life’s work and passion to educate Irishmen about the Gaelic language. Therefore, when the English cartographers come into the town and pressure the townspeople to speak English, Hugh’s resistance is evident. He is reluctant to learn English and disdains the Englishmen for encroaching on his lifestyle. When prodded by Captain Lancey about speaking the supposedly superior language, he bluntly states that “English, I suggested, couldn’t really express us” (Friel 269). English is not the language of their land, so it cannot express the true history and traditions of Ireland.