The doctor suggested a route of further treatment, but the patient made an informed decision that went against the suggestion. The doctor abided by the principle of beneficence and non-maleficence by suggesting a more beneficial and least harmful route while also respecting the autonomy of the patient. In this example and in many others, beneficence is an important principle because perhaps a patient would change their decision if they were given a route that was more beneficial to them and their situation. By doctors and other healthcare professionals giving patients the most beneficial treatments, they are ensuring that patients have all the options available to them when they make a rational decision. Beneficence ensures this which is why it should not be less important than non-maleficence or autonomy which do not ensure the best options are given.
Libertarianism would suggest that, since you are unable to know for certain what the patient’s wishes are regarding the sharing of information, you should air on the side of caution and completely avoid sharing anything with their family. By doing this, you aren’t infringing on the patient’s right to liberty. If the patient felt that their past medical history was of importance and worth sharing, it is safe to assume that they would have done so. Based on this assumption, it is ethical to withhold any and all medical history that does not relate to their current medical
It is necessary to have boundaries when people’s lives are at stake. Since all truths are morally correct, then the belief that not donating organs to help save other peoples lives is morally equal to the belief that we should. If everyone considers their own truths to be right, then we cannot judge one’s opinion or decision because morally they are correct. With that being said, relativism does not aid ones view on organ donating since all truths are equal. Organ donation is a choice.
He believes that morality of individuals not make something actually moral. He is with moral nihilism but against moral relativism. There is nothing in principle objectionable that morality is true. Humans make up their own moral facts and believe them whereas there is nothing morally correct. A third moral nihilist argues that there is nothing in principle objectionable about neither moral nihilism or moral relativism.
Proponents of this theory do not rely on a set of moral principles to determine how they should think or act. They also argue that; subjective individuals do not have the right to criticize or object to their actions; however, some find it possible to disagree (“Morality and Moral Theories”). The second theory, Ethical Egoism states that “right and wrong is determined by what is in your self-interest; also, that it is immoral to act contrary to your own self-interest” (“Morality and Moral Theories”). Proponents of this theory supports actions that maximizes self-interest. They claim that everyone is selfish because of human nature, which is a week point for this theory; given that morality encourages people to consider the interest and wellbeing of others.
This imperative denotes an absolute, unconditional requirement and that one should always treat others as ends in themselves and never as means to our ends. No one should not have their individual freedom compromised for some other end, in particular for the good of the society. Kantians moral deontological theory explicates the value of every person existing. He would believe the act of creating savior siblings is morally impermissible and that the act does not respect the child’s basic human rights. Kant believes that intentions do not promote goodwill or moral duty.
Sometimes the wrong thing will be easier but don’t choose this option. Even if doing what is right is more difficult, endeavor to do so. Don’t harm anyone with your actions and never seek revenge or retribution no matter what the circumstances, as this is sure to result in a crisis for you. Being on this good side of life offers a measure of protection against crisis situations and will even
Accidental knowledge also carries an ethical responsibly even the person has no intention to want to know about it. Accidental knowledge can happen anywhere and anytime and it will constantly test our ethical responsibility. There are many arguments about not helping the person that has a relationship with the accidental knowledge. The ethical responsibility of accidental knowledge can be differed by different perspectives. People who believe accidental knowledge carries an ethical responsibility says it is not moral if we don 't help others that is directly related to the accidental knowledge.
The primary message of this movie is to tell us the importance of patient-centered practice. This movie shows that how we can improve patients’ quality of life through interaction with the patients. Patch Adam’s philosophy is treating the patient, not the disease. That means not only treating the patients’ physical ailment, but also pays attention to their emotional comfort. He shows his compassion toward the patients and tries to change health care in the real world.