Synthesis Essay: The Role Of Diversity In Education

American historian, Russell Kirk once said, “True education is meant to develop the individual human being, the person, rather than to serve the state.” A liberal arts education focuses on developing students into productive citizens by preparing them for future careers, while building their character. Seen as a new approach for further insight and critical thinking, a liberal arts education provides students with a broader worldview for general understanding and problem solving. In his article, “The New Liberal Arts,” Sanford J. Ungar combats common liberal arts misperceptions that prevent future students from attaining a liberal arts degree. Many students believe a liberal arts education is irrelevant; thus, leaving students to futilely

Mr.Fine also made it known that if we chose to become educators that we will not be paid as must as we deserve and deal with, but the reward of teaching our students the truth will be best rewarding feeling that is possible. A final point Mr.Fine showed my classmates and I was that schools is a part of this terrible system of socialization, classism, and white supremacy. The only way we can as people can fix is our

Strengths the theory contains is that the education system movement reflects the Critical Legal Studies(CLS) with the analysis that shows race as the center problem of inequality. Another reason to help the theory’s approach is that CLS scholars evaluate mainstream ideologies on the U.S. society as a dominant power, but don’t include racism in their argument. Nevertheless, racism is not to be ignored for it plays a much more important

In the short story "Hidden Intellectualism" by Gerald Graff, the main idea is to bring acknowledgment to the idea that educators of schools and colleges should incorporate students interest into their teaching. In other words, Graff believes schools and colleges are at fault for not taking the opportunity to use "street smarts" for good academic work (Graff,2010). If Gerald Graff is right about educators needing to incorporate "street smarts" into scholarly works, as I agree, then educators should reevaluate their teaching methods. Students are becoming negligent of gaining knowledge of social interest because it is not encouraged by instructors. Therefore, the only topics students can converse with are related to school work (Graff,2010).

They believed that every classroom, no matter the location, level, or discipline, is a political undertaking for the construction of people and society. They divided the politics in education into two spheres; i.e., micropolitics and macropolitics. Those choices made by teachers that affect the day-to-day classroom development of students are called mircopolitics, and there are macropolitics as well that deal with larger domains involving unequal funding and outcomes of elite and mass institution, biased testing and tracking, inadequate facilities, inequalities, and etc. Nieto (1996) defines the sociopolitical context of multicultural education as “A significant concept of sociopolitical context concerns the unexamined ideologies and myths that shape commonly accepted ideas and values in a society”.

The author wants teachers to teach multiple versions and also to talk about the politics of transcription, race, and gender. I totally agree with the author because there is more than one version of the speech, therefore, teachers should not only focus on teaching only one version of the speech. The author states that the version of Truth’s speech that Francis Gage and Marcus Robinson published were so different that her students were dubious that they were reading the same speech. Gage’s version focuses more on issues that Truth was fighting against such as women’s right and generates a secondary connection of slave’s liberation. On the other hand, Robinson’s version of the speech focuses on equality and abolition of slavery using biblical references and less humor of Truth’s speech.

Lastly, I would like to express my great disappointment in the experience with Professor Nuzzo in this matter and the way the issue has developed. The Grade Appeal system is afforded to the students at St. Francis and it should not be construed as a personal attack against the professor or the school as if I was to “attempt to dictate how I should be graded” or I was “attempting to rewrite the syllabus and rubric.” Regardless of whether or not students’ appeals are ultimately approved, the students should be allowed to appeal their grades when they believe there are reasonable grounds to contest; And it should provide the student with an opportunity for a meaningful review without being accused or scorned. I find Professor Nuzzo’s tone of voice in her response to my grade appeal extremely hostile and contemptuous. I have been a student at St. Francis since 2014, and have never experienced such difficult communications with any professors at St. Francis before.

King has provided his opinion about education is building character. Dr. King uses his words to create an audience awareness to think for yourself isn’t the same as you may call it critical thinking. Against the common assumption that colleges should teach their students “critical reasoning,” Dr. King argues that critical thinking alone is insufficient and even dangerous. Teaching one to think critically is no small task. Most students learn by constructing knowledge based on an engaged learning process rather than by absorbing knowledge from passive sources.

However, Alonso bases her argument on inferences she has drawn from her own personal experiences. For example, a professor will not always admit when they have failed to teach a topic, or acknowledge when they are grading with frustration behind their red pen. Alonso’s conclusions would carry more weight if she were to base them on research. Overall, Alonso has constructed a strong argument about the advantages to examinations that accounts for the different points of view teachers and students

As a university professor, John should have an obligation to supply education to his students in the best way possible, while keeping the student-teacher boundary that exists. Carol tells John that she has trouble understanding his book in which he questions the purpose of education. In an attempt to help Carol, he tells her that people thought that he was stupid as a child. John believes that he can reach Carol on a more personal level by sharing his views and experiences. He hopes that he can create a better relationship with her; in turn, he believes this will further her education.

He says both students and professors need to work together in order to keep the true meaning of college, according to him is to nourish a world of intellectual culture. Edmundson states in his essay that students lack intellectual curiosity. He blames the schools by saying colleges in America are using the consumer mentality to increase their enrollment, but this is affecting the quality of education students are receiving. But he also blames the students for not challenging their conventional thought in fear of being invalidated.

These controversial symbols made the university appear racist to outsiders, the public relations firm was able to conclude. Robert Khayat alone would not had come to this conclusion most likely so it is very instrumental that he seeks out this alternative viewpoint of the

(Not passionate about ideas and books, just want the grade. JOB) Learning how to think also influences students to find what they are passionate about, that is more then grades. Without this passion, students cannot succeed as well as they want, and be happy. This lack of passion in elite student’s starts with a ‘mutual nonaggression pact.’ is created “so students want to do as little as possible.

If college students continue to cut out the aspects of education that may be upsetting, it is very likely that things worth learning will disappear. When classrooms are meant to comply with a certain level of safety and well being, the freedom of real curiosity and discovery are removed and unreal expectations for life are generated. Your Analysis: I found this article to be thought provoking and well written. The author, Peggy Noonan, brings up a number of points that I believe to be relevant in today’s education system. It’s definitely probable that if universities continually remove and edit classroom material and discussions, the kind of learning that results in actual progress will be inhibited.

Some professors evidently feel the need to help these students, which they should but, not just pass the Sooleem students because they don’t speak English well. The pass-fail system will not allow for professors to be biases and will show if the student really put the effort in and earned the pass. The professors should also be there to clarify lectures and assignments. At Grassi Noll, the professor said they wouldn’t be able to help because of their scholarly pursuits, which is understandable, they have busy schedules and are bound by contracts that require scholarly pursuits but, they still have an obligation to help the students if they have questions about that professor’s class and provide assistants and resources to students. With that said, just because the students sit in silence and don’t understand English doesn’t mean they get to just give a passing grade that they did or didn’t earn.