One thing schools can do to help get better school lunches is offer more of a variety. Some schools give each student one specific meal a day, but adding side foods like vegetables and fruit really help. In 2008, and analysis of school lunches concluded that school cafeterias don’t offer much fruit to their students, and that can be a real problem in someone’s health. Luckily, the unhealthy school lunches are getting more and more awareness. School cafeterias are bringing in a better variety in foods such as, salad bars, and different fruits for the students to choose from.
Yes we most definitely have healthier school lunches there would be no more bullying,active kids, and no obese kids. It would be amazing if the school lunches could be healthy. It would also be a life changing thing for all of the obese kids in the world. There are many kids in the world that are obese. We don’t need school lunches making them obese to.
If you child is allergic to peanut butter, almond butter is delicious and a good substitute. There are now fat free chips which are baked and many kids enjoy them. Nutritious diets help children improve their overall well being, maintain a healthy weight, and reduce their risk of illness later in life. As a reaction to the offerings healthy lunches for kids at school, some parents have opted to pack their children’s lunches.
During lunchtime, students generally make their way through the crowded cafeteria to sit with their friends, and enjoy their lunch while being supervised; however, many schools are now authorizing students to have an open campus lunchtime. An open campus allows students to leave school campus unsupervised to have lunch or hang out at a local restaurant or business. Having an open campus is beneficial because it allows students to gain independence, responsibility, trust, the health of students, socialize with friends, and help increase business at local restaurants. Therefore, I believe Arapahoe should continue to have an open campus for the benefit of our students. Having an open campus allows students to leave the school grounds to have lunch outside and be able to socialize with their peers.
Students lunches are being downgraded every year. The United States has one of the cheapest school lunch programs around the world. An Article called The Real Problem with School Lunches talks about how “we criticize schools ' reliance on highly processed, heat- 'n '-eat food, but cooking from scratch requires adequate cold storage and food preparation facilities, as well as trained workers” (Siegel). This shows that we complain so much on how the food is prepared but the government as well as every individual does not want to pay the price. Also “school meals in other countries fascinate us because they reflect a society 's true food culture, as well as its regard for its children” (Siegel).
On the subject of open campus I believe the pros outweigh the cons. I think having open campus could be very beneficial to students. There are many students who aren’t ever really content with the lunches provided at school. For one, having open campus allows students with certain dietary needs to have more options. While many schools have started to provide students with more options, school lunch menus are still lacking.
It would almost feel impossible to get focused and actually complete your homework assignment or finish studying for that test. You also won’t have a lot of energy because you’re body won’t have the right foods to help you maintain that positive energy. So many college students live off Ramen and honestly it’s not very good for you. Of course your freshman year of college you are on a meal plan, but what happens
That waste ends up in landfills and rot to no use or purpose, even though those moldy, rotten tomatoes you threw out have a very good use and it can be the reason why your garden is so full of bright, vibrant flowers and plants. Obviously not just tomatoes would be a good fertilizer for your garden but food in general. Schools are full of students and a majority don 't even finish their lunches. Even the cafeteria over produce some food that just gets thrown away. That food
The lack of a difference in self-esteem between the two groups is great because it shows that the free or reduced lunch programs provide lower-income families with the help that they need while preserving dignity. This could be because the students do not know which of their peers receiving free lunch is or not, or that maybe the students in lunch programs do not feel blame for their economic situation, so they feel comfortable receiving help. Either way, it is good that students who receive free or reduced lunch do not appear to feel ashamed about
it had seemed as if we 'd made it. But all that changed after the first day of school. At my school, black students weren 't very abundant; to be honest the only thing that was about us was the stereotypes. So when I arrived, some students assumed I was a stereotype. They assumed that I was poor, couldn 't talk properly, wasn 't smart, and had an obsessed with fried chicken, watermelon, and Kool-Aid.