ipl-logo

The Importance Of Eminent Domain

1003 Words5 Pages

Eminent Domain Must Be Abolished in the United States
Everyone has had some time in their life when something was wrongfully stolen, like a toy, watch, or a piece of clothing. Now imagine the feeling of losing one’s own house. It is very frustrating to have something valuable stolen, but it would be enraging to have one’s trust abused as well. For years, the United States Government has used a practice known as Eminent Domain. Eminent Domain is the Legal practice in which the United States federal government influences its right to seize private property and civil assets. While the government may claim that this is for the good of everyone, the facts say otherwise in the vast majority of cases. Eminent Domain has put a restraint on the American …show more content…

This aspect is a paradox of the fundamental reasoning behind Eminent Domain. One instance of the critical impact of Eminent Domain is the San Francisco Redevelopment project, in which the involved agency evicted over 4,000 local residents. In this particular Eminent Domain, most of the victims, who were living below the poverty level, were removed from their homes and relocated across the South of Market neighborhood, in favor of an Eminent Domain exercise aimed at creating space for the development of luxurious hotels, parks, markets and businesses. According to statistics, this project influenced significant socio-economic disparity, as corporations moved in to the project to do business. Then the poor who originally owned the area remained in the outskirts, without jobs. In this regard, it is apparent that eminent domain can influence significant unfairness against certain specific minority groups, and other demographics in the U.S. community (Kerekes, p …show more content…

This is due to their profound influence, and financial power to establish new investments. On the other end, local civilians present the demographic group that usually assumes the most deprived position in the mix. As such, eminent domain is a practice that generates significant questioning of the moral compass and, and ethical foundations upon which the leadership of The United states is founded (Baude, p 34). Finally, different states in America are governed by different sets of rules and legislations. This aspect renders eminent domain a major causal aspect of legislation controversies, as eminent domain presents a profound basis for litigation, which affects peace, harmony and unity of the United States as country. In this light, there is a dire need for the U.S government to abolish the practice of eminent domain, and to face the endeavor of finding new strategies, and new principles of acquiring private property in cases where the needs and wants of the public are deemed necessary (Gallagher & Elizabeth, p

Show More
Related

  • Differences Between The French And Indian War Dbq

    413 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1742 the chief of Onondaga of the Iroquois Confederacy knew that his land that the people shared would become more valuable than it has ever been. (Doc B)The reason for this was because the “white people” also known as the Americans wanted the land of the chief. The feelings of the Chief result in complaining to the representatives of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia,

    Read More

  • Continental Congress Transformation

    828 Words  | 4 Pages

    States would slowly casual property-possession prerequisites and recently expressed that white male natives of twenty-one years old or more were permitted to

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On The 8th Amendment

    590 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the discussion of the 8th amendment, this paper will examine: the history of the 8th amendment, the interpretations made by courts regarding 8th, and how the 8th affects us today. The Amendment first was ratified in 1791 along with the nine other amendments to form the bill of rights. The bill of rights is used to “lists specific prohibitions on governmental power.” (“Bill of Rights”). By doing this, the government has less power to not make the citizens feel like that even the government has to follow some sort of procedure and would stabilize the power the government has from having either too much or too little.

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Pros And Cons

    733 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court had decided that the Indians could live on the land; however, they could not hold a title to the land. This was because their “right to own their land” was inferior to the settler’s “right to discovery.” The Indian’s wanted to own their own land because it was theirs to begin with; therefore, they thought this decision was

    Read More

  • Was Reconstruction A Success Or Failure Essay

    1823 Words  | 8 Pages

    For example, in 1891, Congress “relieved” the Mission Indians, that were at the time residing in California, of their water. What this actually meant was that, under section two of this act, the Mission Indians, only had a specific piece of land they could live on, called a reservation. In addition to the Whites telling them where to live, they gave them a limitation on how many acres they could own; giving them no more than 640 acres, but no less than 160 acres. Only to further the oppression, section three states that construction was allowed for a major “flume, ditch canal, pipe, or other appliances for the conveyance of water over, across, or through such reservations for agricultural, manufacturing, or other purposes…” (Blum, Gjerde, and Hoffman, 47).

    Read More

  • What Are The Pros And Cons Of Eminent Domain

    1566 Words  | 7 Pages

    The seizing of land by the government provides communities for schools, as well as roads and infrastructure to be built. This in turn either creates jobs for individuals inside these neighborhoods, or provides them with necessary infrastructure to continue their lives. On the other hand, many argue against the government for using eminent domain in which all land is seized without worthy compensation, and as a way to further damage the environment. In the past, the process of eminent domain caused groups of people to lose their homes and culture without any form of compensation. Due to the impacts that eminent domain is responsible for, we must reevaluate whether the failures of eminent domain in the past define the overall process as productive and beneficial or if that is not the

    Read More

  • Case Study: Kelo Vs. City Of New London

    2469 Words  | 10 Pages

    The takings clause of the Fifth Amendment states that private property shall not be taken for public use, without just compensation. The power of eminent domain is essential for a developed state, for example to build roads and highways the government often needs to seize land from private individuals. Questions surrounding the use of eminent domain and the takings clause include what counts as a seizure of land, what counts as just compensation, and what counts as public use. In 2005 the Supreme Court heard the case Kelo vs City of New London which dealt with the question of what counts as a public use. Justice Stevens’s majority opinion in this case appeals to Dworkin’s method, while Justice Kennedy’s reasoning would be endorsed by Hart.

    Read More

  • Cherokee In Georgia Owned Land

    203 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Georgia speculators went to the government of state, and asked if they could have the Cherokees’ land. Georgia invoked eminent domain. The Cherokees hired lawyers and went to the Georgia courts.

    Read More

  • Comparing The Cherokee Removal, Perdue And Green

    446 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the book, The Cherokee Removal, Perdue and Green argue that the Cherokee Nation was treated unfairly by the U.S. Government in the 1800s. The majority of Americans were not fond of the Native Americans, and the Americans felt as if the Native Americans were on their rightfully owned property. Perdue and Green display how the states were trying to remove the Natives when they write, “A state could use its legal institutions to make life for Indians so miserable that they would gladly sell their lands and flee to the West” (Perdue and Green, 73).

    Read More

  • Westward Expansion Dbq

    832 Words  | 4 Pages

    Acres of land became cheaper to buy because Americans “ rapidly moved across the North American continent and used their belief in Manifest Destiny.” In Document 2, the poster shows, that land in the West was very cheap and it included a 10 year credit allowing a lot of newcomers

    Read More

  • The Trans-Mississippi West

    784 Words  | 4 Pages

    During the “Gilded Age” period of American history, development of the Trans-Mississippi west was crucial to fulfilling the American dream of manifest destiny and creating an identity which was distinctly American. Since the west is often associated with rugged pioneers and frontiersmen, there is an overarching idea of hardy American individualism. However, although these settlers were brave and helped to make America into what it is today, they heavily relied on federal support. It would not have been possible for white Americans to settle the Trans-Mississippi west without the US government removing Native Americans from their lands and placing them on reservations, offering land grants and incentives for people to move out west, and the

    Read More

  • Do Native Americans Need Their Land Back Essay

    900 Words  | 4 Pages

    The best way to bring back one of the bad things done to people just because they ain't like is giving back what we took from them and in this case it would be land

    Read More

  • Squatter And The Don By Maria Amparo Ruiz De Burton

    571 Words  | 3 Pages

    We are ‘settlers’. We take up land that belongs to us, American citizens, by paying the government price for it.” (Burton 238). This comment on a deeper context was the view and beliefs of American in 1848. Additionally, the social hierarchy is apparent and supports Alamar’s comment that there is inequality and prejudices within the U.S. government.

    Read More

  • Aldo Leopold The Land Ethic Summary

    614 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Land Ethic Argument Outline Aldo Leopold’s “The Land Ethic” is an essay describing why we should not treat our land as our property. The first part of half of his essay is based on an anecdote that alludes to Odysseus returning from Troy to behead his slaves. His comparison there is that as once it was alright to treat people as property, it is now just fine to do the same thing to your land. Additionally, as ethics of the treatment of people changed as with the ethics of land treatment.

    Read More

  • Why Did The Homestead Act Fail

    1499 Words  | 6 Pages

    Not only were the land sales out in the west was a major problem but also the physical land held major problems for farmers. Many people bought land from the government like they were supposed to while many did not purchase the legitimate way, in The American Pageant it states, “about half a million families took advantage of the Homestead Act … Yet five times that many families purchased their lands from railroads” (Kennedy 645), the people were cheating the system. This quote is showing how the railroads were wrongfully benefiting from the West lands and how people could get around the requirements the Act stated, for example the five year limit and in those years the lands must be improved. Another problem with the land sales was that naked fraud occurred; this meant that the public lands were owned by “land-grabbing promoters” than regular farmers this was cheating the farmers and the government of proper land development. On the topic of land development a large problem with the farming life in the west was that the lands were unfit for farming.

    Read More

More about The Importance Of Eminent Domain

Open Document