If a coach's philosophy behind playing competitive sports is to win, then he must put the best team on the field. Returning starters are usually considered first, but they still need to prove themselves every season. With that in mind, coaches need to evaluate everyone and not just a select few, otherwise it potentially destroys the idea of playing the best. Whereas without entitlement, athletes have to prove themselves to the team.
Not having entitlement in sports allows everyone an equal chance at earning a starting position. Although upperclassman are generally more advanced, coaches need to chose skill over age when selecting their team. I have been a baseball varsity starter for Royalton High School since eighth grade and have loved every
…show more content…
When players have to earn their spot, teams will reach their maximum potential then. Competitive teams play to win, not please people, so playing time should be determined by ability. Even though playing time is unequal, anybody who proves himself will receive more. For instance, my legion baseball team last summer had a struggling infield. After numerous costly errors from our second baseman, my coach Ryan Snyder brought up a younger athlete who deserved the chance to play and excelled at second base, solving our problems for the rest of the season. The skill level of our team went from average to great, and making fewer errors per game allowed us to win more. If something may benefit a team, it needs to occur, whether or not people agree with it. Age does not entitle an athlete to automatically play above everyone else, and without having entitlement, our baseball team reached its full potential. Another time my baseball team became better from not having entitlement occurred three years ago. Jerry, my original coach for that summer, believed in entitlement, and if he did not know an athlete personally he would not play him. So when my best friend joined the team he hardly played, and it frustrated him. Austin could out perform any other outfielder but Jerry looked at an athlete’s personality and age instead of talent. About half way through the season, Jerry resigned due to some conflicts with the Waite Park
Have you ever wondered if a college athlete should or shouldn’t get paid? Well the truth is that, the athletes don’t see their fair share even if they’re one of the best players on the team. Many believe that scholarships cover the fact that college athletes don’t get paid.
Why collegiate athletes should get paid. Collegiate athletes should get paid. This has been a problem many people are bringing up for discussion. Some do not believe collegiate athletes should get paid because it takes away from the “purity” of the sport or because it wouldn’t be quite “fair” and we would then have to pay high school athletes.
A lot of sports recruits come from the inner city, country or a humble environment. Going to college is a completely new and different experience. A large portion of players are trying to adjust in the classroom and feel inferior in more ways than we care to realize. Many of the students at major universities in the United States typically come from families that have incomes that are above the national average. These players are asked to come to the college’s where they are not socially equal but they are expected to feel good about the situation and themselves.
High school coaches should not be required to give equal playing time to all players who make the team. Kids in society have been handed things their entire life. There has been little to no sense of accomplishment after earning a spot or position on a team. Spots should be earned by being the best at what someone does, not for pitty and for moral victories to make them feel good. “In high school, kids should understand playing time is earned.
By forcing athletes to go to college doesn 't mean they are going to get an education. If the athletes aren 't made to graduate what 's the point in making them go for a few years. Only reason they are forced is to make the college money, So basically the athletes are being used for money. To prove that why do you think other sports don 't have this rule? Because they aren 't wanted or make as much money or basketball or football.
College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.
A player that isn’t ready to handle the full-load of the NBA can up cracking under the pressure and fizzling out in a short period of time. Therefore, players with great potential could end up being wasted talents and that’s not fair to either party. These elite prospects dedicate the vast majority of their early life to the game of basketball, so if they’re out of the NBA, it’s almost as if they’ve wasted that part of their life. It’s clear that some sort of change is needed even Adam Silver, the Commissioner of the NBA, agrees “It’s not working, certainly from the college coaches and athletic directors I hear from,” Silver said. “They’re not happy with the current system.
Those individuals who just made the team now deal with a problem that happens mainly from the high school level all the way to the professional leagues. That problem is the issue of humiliating and victimizing “rookie” athletes through hazing rituals. These individuals go from hearing in try
This would imply that no athletes position was safe, a nation that does not fit with the love of the game. Coaches will at time schedule less challenging classes or ones that will be easier to a practice schedule. These points make it seem like " athletes" really does come before students. Many will say that the student athletes are already compensated with a college education. The idea that an education is worth to a player what a professional salary would seem to be a naive view.
Division I athletes deserve to earn compensation because the NCAA, a billion-dollar industry, and the universities these athletes are paying for can afford to give these athletes a separate payment that does not include scholarship money they may receive.
Did you know that depending on the sport, students who play sports in college most likely have less than a 2% chance of becoming professional athletes? At middle schools, high schools and colleges across the country, everyone is arguing over whether or not students with failing grades should be allowed to play sports. In my opinion, a good education is so very important for our country’s youth, especially the athletes. Not a lot of kids are good enough to play in the top college sports programs in the country. But even those who are, still have an astonishingly low chance at making the professional leagues.
Athletes who play football or basketball are at a higher risk of career ending injuries. These two sports are the hardest on an athletes body. Only one out of twenty-five college athletes go pro, so why put your body at risk when you don’t receive anything for doing that and your chances of going pro are slim? A lot of these student athletes are stressed out because of schoolwork participating in a college sport. This is just another reason that these athletes deserve to be
The argument made by these two professors state that Division 1 players qualify as employees under Federal Labor Laws. Since players are under this law, the McCormick’s feel players should get financially compensated due to the physical rigors and balance education simultaneously (Cooper, 2011). It’s unbelievable how this couple thinks Division 1 athletes should get paid. The privilege to attend a university that is costly on full scholarship should be more than enough. Furthermore, student-athletes received stipends as an allowance assist with their livelihood.
This would be not fair to hard-working students who cannot afford college and rely on scholarships and aid. Unfortunately, athletes focus more on performance than on academics, and scholarship money may go to
“Female discrimination in sports is a common occurrence all around the world, women are seen as less than males.” (Ladrea) Equality in sports is unequal. In the 1800 women got very little attention and did not get the opportunity to play in any sport in America and all around the world. Men could go and try out for different sports teams and workout but for women they were only allowed to stay home to cook and clean. There were some events women could participate in but it could not be competitive, it was focused on getting active and staying active.