Environmental ethics refers to the moral relations between humans and the natural world (Taylor, 2011). It is a value system which incorporates the theory and practice of the principles determining our duties, obligations and responsibilities in terms of the Earth’s natural environment and all the fauna and flora that inhabit it. According to Norton (1984), the assumption that environmental ethics must be non-anthropocentric is mistaken due to the fact that anthropocentrism can be strong or weak.
Anthropocentrism is an approach whereby humankind is considered superior to the natural world and has the right to subjugate it (Richardson, 1997). It is an individualistic environmental ethic in which the environment is only valuable to the extent
…show more content…
The most important and long-lasting consequence of the explosion of the human population is loss of the earth’s biodiversity. Human population growth is causing species to be threatened and driving them to extinction by destroying their habitats and ecosystems. Natural areas are becoming increasingly fragmented due to the continuous increase in urbanization (Goddard and Dougill et al., 2010). Many areas have been and are being urbanized in order to extend residential areas, build offices, industrial areas and malls, improve infrastructure and build recreational facilities. The increase of greenhouse gas emissions also has a huge impact on the planet, resulting in global warming and climate change. There is a growing importance of urban green space to enable the conservation of biodiversity (Goddard and Dougill et al., 2010).
According to Ehrlich and Holdren (1971), human beings live in an epidemiological environment which deteriorates with overpopulation and malnutrition, both of which increase with population growth. It is our responsibility to stabilize and reduce the human population to achieve sustainable living. By slowing down population growth, we can improve living standards in a sustainable manner. This can be achieved
…show more content…
By creating awareness and educating people about the link between human population growth and the environment, they can understand the seriousness of the situation we are currently facing. Everyone must be willing to take the step to make a difference. If everyone puts in a small amount of effort, it would seem less difficult and have a more profound effect. Some say ignorance is bliss but in this situation that kind of thinking will do a total disservice to the earth and the inhabitants of the earth. Each and every one of us need to adopt the right attitude and take on some responsibility for the well-being of ourselves and this beautiful planet that we reside
Growing populations is decreasing our live stock, our climate, our ozone and depleting our planet of natural resources. Lack of proper management as more and more people are born into our planet unaware of the growing and the lengthening of the populations inability to care for the planet. It would be in our bet effort to involve a series of punishments to those that harm our ecosystem. Those that hurt mother nature may be entitled to a large fine or a serious amount of harm to represent our planets harm. Lots of important people will be into this proposal of more awareness of our planet.
Additionally, from an environmentalist view, wilderness should not be seen as a separate entity but rather one with humanity. Consequently, where one does not just go to a nature preserve to feel reconnected momentarily,
The inhabitants right to an “environment that is not harmful to their health and well-being” and the right to “ecologically sustainable development” is violated. Environmental ethics, on the other hand, is the area of applied ethics that discusses, reflects and reasons on normative measures (values, rules, norms, criteria) for dealing with non-human natural entities in a responsible way (Karafyllis 2013, p.292). In particular, it refers to the value that mankind places on protecting, conserving, and efficiently using resources that the earth provides. Simply put, environmental ethics poses the question - what, if any, moral obligation does man have to the preservation and care of the non-human
The environmentalists love their country by saving its land and resources, both of which are essential. One has an instinctual urge to love and protect one’s
They exhibit total reverence, respect, peace for all things and their livelihood is in accordance with Maasaw (Creator) instructions and regulations. Moral ecology describes a scenario where all the behavioral strategies are geared toward promoting high standards of cooperation within different groups and this becomes a moral norm to the people whereas ecological morality signifies to the principle set to govern the human perception and attitude
Once the environment is perceived as an equal part of an individual’s community, the human ethical spirit will respect the environment, cherish its benefits and beauty, and be obligated to preserve it. If future generations are taught to create harmony between the three pillars of society: economic, social, and environmental, further damage to the environment can be
Which view seems to you to be the more adequate? Explain your answer. Ecological ethics states that ecological systems are intrinsically valuable and that they deserve
He argues that we should treat our land with care and respect as we now treat one another, for we will be ushering a new era of change the is all for the better. The second half of the essay begins with "The Ecological Conscience". Starting off by stating “Conservation is a state of harmony between men and land” and going on to describe how our fight for land is improving it is moving far too slow. This transforms into the
Karin 20/08/2014 English 8A Nearly everyday in our lives, we see banners, magazines, newspapers, as well as posters telling us to be environmental friendly and to stop pollution. But do people listen to the advices? Do people realize that pollution is one of the biggest global killers? Pollution is the number 1 cause of death in the developing world; it kills approximately 10 million people every year. It’s hard to tell when and where pollution began.
These explanations are persuasive in their own right, but ecologists have increased some additional to deal with, like what would be the resultant of alteration of biodiversity on ecosystem properties, such as productivity, carbon storage, hydrology, and nutrient cycling? The apparent follow-up problem is what are the resultant of resemble largely anthropogenic alteration in biodiversity on the goods and services that ecosystems give to humans? If altered biodiversity affects ecosystem lot, is there a point at which changes in the lot might have a negative influence in human welfare? That is, those problems that being answered step by step by our own biodiversity, climate change, ozone layer begins to release the air or gas, and
Imagine you live in a world where there are no plants, forest, animals, or oceans all there is in where these things us to be is concrete, landfills of garbage, and buildings. This is what will transpire if we do not protect or wildlife, wildlife conservation is a very important situation as it helps keeps plants and animals off the endangered list. According to the World Wild Life organization there are twenty-six endangered animals and twenty-one critically endangered animals this is very overwhelming as animals are an important part of our environment and ecosystem. With human population increasing at an alarming rate, with the growing rate of humans there is going to be less land for animals and plants, more man-made pollution and plastic debris will go into the oceans, lakes, and streams.
Introduction Overpopulation is the excessive population of an area to the point of overcrowding and it is an undesirable condition in every country where the number of existing human population rises to an extent exceeding the carrying capacity of ecological setting. Overpopulation can be result from an increase in births, an increase in immigration, a decline in mortality rates and other factors that may cause overpopulated environment. Therefore, this can cause influence as lack of the available essential materials for survival like water, shelter, social amenities and other because of the numbers of people might be more than the materials for survival. In such condition, this regularly contributes to environmental deterioration, worsening
The reading assignments for this week has been very educative about the environment and making it a better place for living. In this written assignment, I will examine some of the ethical issues related to population growth and their effect to the environment. Also, I will propose solutions to these problems base on the reading material available for this Unit. But before I continue, I wish to introduce us to environmental ethics and its definition which I think it is very important for us to understand so as to know our role to play in this beautiful planet. Environmental ethics is the discipline in philosophy that studies the moral relationship of human beings to, and also the value and moral status of, the environment and its non-human contents
Indeed, no citizen of the earth can afford to remain aloof from the issue related to the environment. It is therefore, essentially important that the study of the environment becomes an integral part of the education process. Environmental education increases public awareness and knowledge about environmental issues or problems. In doing so, it provides the public with the necessary skills to make informed decisions and take responsible actions. Needs and importance of positive attitude and awareness towards environment:
Hence, deforestation increases. This is another effect of overpopulation that impacts the worsening of the environment [2]. For example decreased forest size increases the amount of carbon in the environment. More specifically, deforestation affects the wildlife and results in biodiversity loss and species extinction [1].