Evaluation methodology is a tool that helps in understanding steps necessary for quality evaluation. Faculty members use these methods and processes to determine the nature, skill, product and quality of a performance. Evaluation and valuing evaluation involves the definition of the parameters of evaluation, designing methods to be used, setting the standards used to collect evidence and reporting and making decisions based on ones findings. It is only through evaluation that programs, events or services can be systematically reviewed to find out whether they meet the goals of a specific group or individual (Christie & Alkin, 2013). Evaluation has three ‘roots’: social accountability, epistemology and systematic social inquiry.
Accountability
…show more content…
Paradigms are perspectives or worldviews in research and evaluation, which include values, assumptions, purposes and methodologies that in general consists of a methodology, an epistemology and ontology. This ‘root’ is important in addressing diverse views on the nature of knowledge. Those involved in epistemological discussions ideally rely on constructivism, post-positivism or pragmatism. Philosophical theories have largely shaped evaluation perspectives over a long time in evaluation history. Constructivism is one of the aspects of interptretivism. Pragmatists utilize subjectivity and objectivity as two different positions on a continuum (Christie & Alkin, 2013). They are also of the view that inductive and deductive reasoning should be used in concert. Post positivists have the objective of “measuring truth” (Christie & Alkin, 2013). They do so despite the fact that the same objective may not be attained because all observations are imperfect and …show more content…
Quality evaluation priorities are set every year and internal verification and assessments processes are planned and implemented annually. The choice of criteria or methodologies to use during examinations is also the responsibility of the college executive board. Some of the methods include: the implementation of a revised assessment and internal verification policy for vocational programs, training and accrediting internal verifiers and assessors and, completion of quality checks meant to evaluate the effectiveness of new “observation policies”. The college evaluation program also requires evaluators to collect and analyze data, then use it proactively to close gaps that may exist in achievements between students and groups. This is because the college recognises that “individual’s continual professional or academic performance” directly affects student
Two historical examples of crucial times in evaluation culture used were detailed accounts of a preventable Rwandan genocide, and then to NASA’s space disaster which held his foundation on evaluations being personal and situational. This while contributing
Accountability is the idea of not only taking blame for the repercussions of your actions, but it also has a strong correlation with responsibility. Wiesel goes to show that no matter how difficult things may get, people will become less accountable to others and worry more about their own living and care. ¨when one is faced with demanding obstacles, one’s sense of obligation to others may become compromised¨. (Accountability in Night ). If things are rough we can lose a sense of who we are and the morals that we once had.
Hi Kelly, I truly enjoyed your informative presentation. It is obvious that the APA provides effective standards for evaluator to adopt and initiate on their professional life when working on organization program and socially acquainting with individuals interested with the program. The evaluation must be done well with no notions involving negative thought, tricking, or manipulating with intent to override the investigation or miscommunicate with others. Consecutive communicative interaction with stakeholders informing them of the evaluation progress would enhance their motivation and contribution to a long life program. It is true that the evaluator has the duty to salvage participants’ safety and protect them from any harms, and protecting
There are three components of accountability: 1. Results Reports: These include evaluation of programs run by school counselors as well as evaluation of changes in students over time throughout the school. Such results are used to make programs more effective and should be shared with stakeholders. 2. Performance Standards: This involves evaluating the school counselor through a rating system designed to assess if the counselor has effectively implemented a comprehensive program and met the goals specified in the management agreement.
In the realm of Army Leaders we can be accountable for many things from equipment to soldiers, we have all heard the term “account for beans and bullets”. To take accountability for ones actions goes far beyond the abstract of just leading your subordinates it is also a term that we as Leaders have dismissed when it comes to our own self. I often find myself having an internal debate with this word or what it means to me, it seems to me that we have lost the meaning or better yet we have been improperly using the true meaning of
Accountability is a very controversial subject among different careers. Although accountability it is a simple word, it has a very big meaning. As careers differ, so do the standards one must hold in order to keep the company working and moving smoothly. With a higher standard comes a smaller area to make mistakes; therefore leading to a much higher amount of accountability one holds. For example, a doctor cannot make a mistake during a procedure on a patient and then go back and “edit” it to make it like new.
Certainly this refers to teaching as well. A teacher is a lifelong learner, thus, by evaluating my teaching I would be able to recognize my strengths and weaknesses, and as a result become better at my profession. One of the aspects of evaluation is a Continuous Professional Development process (evidence 6), which ensures improving the vocational and subject knowledge continuously. One of the responsibilities would be abidance with regulatory requirements, legislation, policies and procedures, and codes of practice.
2:1 Compare the strengths and limitations of assessments of a range of assessment methods with reference to the needs of individual learners. Workplace Observations, question and answer/professional discussions, projects/assignments, portfolios, witness statements. A good assessor will always take into account their learners needs and what particular subject they are studying for prior to confirming with learner type of assessment method to be used. Workplace observations
This does not exclude a quantitative approach being associated with a post-positivist approach. In contrast, for a researcher who favors interpretive, knowledge is a matter of interpretation (Schutt, 2009) so that the quest for understanding the complex world of lived experience demands that the researcher interact with the research objects/participants to get the viewpoint. The investigator favored a post-positivist approach since he believes that human knowledge can be challenged and modified in light of further investigation. Following is a description of the methodology that was followed for this
Findings from assessments should always serve as a basis for decisions for actions or non-actions towards the program. This may cause program maintenance, improvement, alteration, or termination – either of this should ultimately render some positive benefits such as improve social conditions. (Rossi et al.,
This literature review will be covering the topic on research paradigms. There are three major paradigms in the research paradigms which are the positivist paradigm research, interpretivist paradigm research and critical paradigm research. Each research paradigm has its own strengths and effectiveness due to their unique features which are specific to their particular approach as well as weaknesses. All researchers have their own beliefs and methods while conducting a research. Therefore, the ways of research studies conducted are vary.
This reflection paper is focus on the evaluation of programs using “social science research methods” and results to “determine whether a public program is worthwhile” (Holzer and Schwester, 2011, p. 260). As my group presented last week, performance measurement and program evaluation are “complementary activities” (MacDavid and Hawthorn, 2006). For example, performance measurement provides empirical evidence in the progress of Hawaii Homelessness Programs, whereas program evaluation provide meaning to the result of that homelessness performance measurement. According to MacDavid and Hawthorn (2006), performance measurement sometimes can be referred to as ‘result-based management’ and information from program evaluations and performance measurement
ON POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES (ENVIRONMENT) According to Alkharusi (2010), classroom assessment involves an extensive variety of activities from planning paper-pencil tests and performance measures to grading, communicating assessment results, and utilizing them in making decisions. Theoretically, perceived classroom evaluation condition alludes to the general implying that understudies make out of the different educators' appraisal hones in the classroom. Operationally, it has been presented by two dimensions: learning- and harsh-oriented appraisal conditions.
INTRODUCTION The researchers are subjected to different theories, methods, and belief systems which are already existing to guide the investigation, inquiry or study. The research tradition or research paradigm is the system that a researcher needs to follow based on type of a research. Research Paradigm can be defined as a belief system which guides the researcher on how the study should be investigated and addressed. The focus of following paper will be on differentiating between three types of research traditions which are positivism, interpretivism and critical realism based on their positions on; reason for research, ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology.