If presented a complex word, then one may believe that the accident was a lot more worse than it actually was. In experiment two, Loftus and Palmer were focused on the phrasing of the question and how it could create a false memory about that accident. One hundred and fifty students participated. The subjects were required to remember the accident and to describe it their own words. Fifty were asked the speed of the car when it was smashed, another fifty were asked the speed of the car when it was hit, and the other fifty were asked no question regarding speed.
First of all, “13,000 lives lost each year due to speeding” and “39% male drivers, age 15 -20 were speeding at the time of their fatal vehicle crash” “(Dangers of Speeding While Driving)”, it’s important to know about this statistics because many people need to give speeding a second thought, they don’t understand what is going on around them, they only care about getting to their destination but often forget about increase risk of getting in a car accident or causing death. As far as defense driving goes, 94% of human’s errors are responsible for all crashes which proves that defensive driving is important if you don’t drive unsafely, it can cause serious crashes, injuries, or even death. With that in mind, “. Drivers cannot control what other people on the road are going to do, so it’s important that they put themselves in a solid position to avoid the consequences of any risky actions others may take” (“The Importance of Defensive Driving and Safety”). Lastly, not following the rules of the road, speeding and misinterpreting the concept of defensive driving can increase the number of car crashes and deaths and put lives at
NBC News San Diego reported that the study found drivers who had a BAC level of 0.01 percent were 46 percent more likely to cause accidents than the sober drivers they collided with. Therefore, people’s risk of causing serious crashes increases as their BAC levels rise. Seeking legal guidance Californians who are involved in drunk driving accidents may suffer serious injuries, which require extensive medical treatment. This may lead to unexpected medical expenses and, in some cases, may impact their ability to work and provide for their families. Therefore, people who have experienced these types of situations may benefit from working with an attorney.
In this week’s Ted Talk, Elizabeth Loftus explained some of her studies on false memories. She investigates when people remember things that did not happen or remember things in a different way. In one of her studies, Loftus showed participants simulated car accidents and then asked them questions to know what they remembered. She asked them, how fast the cars were when they smashed into each other. Using the word “smashed” influenced participants to say that the cars were going really fast and they remembered seeing broken glass in the scene, when in reality there was no broken glass.
All of these are distractions even though they may not seem like it. Some distractions are more dangerous than others. Every year about thirty-seven thousand people die in automobile crashes in the United States (Hopkins). Also every year about 421,000 people are injured in crashes that have involved a driver who was distracted in some way
As explained, subjective bias is a critical risk when considering the evidence in the court. Thus, there is a possibility of subjective bias if forensic scientists are embedded with police institutes. As an example, police organizational culture with the hierarchy has the potential power to eliminate or suppress unfavorable evidences. However, on the other hand, if forensic scientists are independent, there is also possibility of scientists working in favor of their clients’ interest. Therefore, it is an important aspect to consider about how to operate this forensic scientists in fair manner that can favor both police and defendants.
If a person got charged with involuntary manslaughter, they would go to jail for up to 16 months. Many people believe that because they are just going a short distance, they do not think wearing a seatbelt is necessary. Experts say that “80 perfect of fatal accidents happen within 25 miles of the home (Pros and Cons of Seat Belts)”. Therefore just because you are only going down the street, you could still get in an accident. It is understandable why some believe that, because you would not think that it could be dangerous.
People seem to not grasp the concept that texting while driving is dangerous, it does not matter the level of experience or the age. Per the National Highway Traffic Safeway Administration, talking on a cell phone causes nearly 25 percent of car crashes. That statistic directly points to the key fact that texting and driving is a key cause of most accidents on the road. Most people would be quick to the jump to the defense that these people aren’t them and they can do it better or be safer. But a study published by icebike.org refutes that as well.
However this may be important to victims who may be unavailable for the court proceedings due to unavoidable circumstances. The right to participate or attend the criminal justice proceedings by the crime victims and their families may include the right to attend the trial, sentencing or the parole hearing of the perpetrator. It is the right of the victims to participate in the proceedings to have assurance of the process. Of importance and significance also is that they may note the counsel’s argument as well as weigh in the different reactions from the jury and
I do not see it as if there are pros and cons on the subject, but one of the cons is defiantly death. Ryan Dydone from the video “Distracted driving killing more American teens” became a victim of distracted driving. Apparently, he was only 15 years old, and it is truly heart breaking, that someone that young has to die, just because someone was distracted while driving. You get a certain amount of responsibility when you drive with others in the car, I believe, and when you get that much responsibility on your hands, then you should not joke about it. You should be able to – for example – drive carefully and not mess around while driving.
In my research paper my topic is about the brutality of police tactics, and how they plan on improving these to make their attempts at arresting less forceful. “Are we becoming a police state?” This question is asked by many Americans today, Why? Because there are so many deaths by police that many feel like they are superior to laws, and often times the criminal offences they cause are overlooked. The fact that it’s only few cops that do this, they all get the bad reputation.
If you are a drunk driver you should be driving a vehicle.
Are You Sure? Why have more than two-thousand people exonerated for crimes they didn’t commit? Eyewitness misidentification is the leading cause of wrongful convictions in the U.S. Memory can be influenced by anxiety, stress, reconstructive memory and other factors possibly affecting the testimony of the eyewitness and in turn, misleading the jury. I think that when subjects witness a crime they will struggle to remember important details of the event, and their recollection could be easily altered. This is because the reconstructive memory can be influenced by factors such as stress, anxiety, and verbal cues.
The criminal justice system depends majorly on eyewitness identification for investigating and prosecuting crimes. Psychologists have been the only ones who have warned the justice system of problems with eyewitness identification evidence. Recent DNA exoneration cases have corrupted the warnings of eyewitness identification researchers by showing that mistaken eyewitness identification was the largest factor contributing to the conviction of many innocent people eyewitness testimonies are not reliable therefor you would assume they would be taken out of court, but instead
LLB106 CRIMINAL LAW CULTURAL COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT Semester 2, 2016 This assessment is worth 20% of your overall mark for LLB106. Name: Storme Louw Student Number: n9445684 INSTRUCTIONS 1.