When considering whether or not kids should be paid for good grades, the choice should definitely be yes, they should. Schools should pay students for good grades seeing that graduation rates increase. In addition, students will be prepared for the real world. Test scores go up, as well. If this is ignored, more and more students will drop out of school, less people will graduate, and test scores will significantly drop.
Students who want to be the one on top of charts will be driven to take hard courses to be the best. Class rank can academically profit students and let them know that all their uphill struggle, stress with tough courses, and competition will pay off in the end. The students who know their high school has class rank will challenge themselves and try to be the best that they can be. Class rank can also notify how the student is doing academically. It can help people know where they stand to in comparison to other students in their class.
As a result, the money from parents increase student’s GPA. Sometimes parents of students pay for children’s grades. Accordingly, if their children get bad grades on all the tests, the students still could get good grades for the class. This issue is a highly controversial topic. Although paying for grades increases a student’s GPA, it actually gives students a negative consequence.
The introduction of smaller class sizes will benefit college students to be further proactive in class and with their studies. Additionally, there will be a more welcoming and relaxed atmosphere for the students and teachers who can now connect on a personal level. Furthermore, the performance of students will increase because they can ask questions to the professor who will have more guided answers pertaining to the subject manner than the tutor. Students are forking out thousands of dollars for their education, and by lowering the class sizes it will increase the academic performance and motivation of the students to make their money worth
There and many similarities and differences between universities and community college. Even though it 's all the same outcome, a higher education. People seem to see more differences than similarities. Growing up our parents all want the best for us like get good grades, finish high school, and go to a good college after high school. What you don 't realize until you get a little older is that how competitive it is to get into a good school.
One who has loyalty during both feudalism and high school may seem exceptional, but dire consequences may occur if one strays from loyalty. In feudalism, the social ranking affects one’s lifestyle similar to high school. However, the lifestyle of a high school student is affected educationally, unlike a lifestyle during feudalism where it is more socially affected. Regardless of either time frame or social ranking, if one works hard in achieving to be something great he or she can soar to exceptional heights in
If a student enrolled in an extracurricular activity does not maintain a grade of above 70 in all of his/her classes, then they may not participate in any UIL events or contests. This, I believe, actually motivates students to pass their classes more so than just accumulating the credit hours necessary to graduate. This may also reveal that fine arts students have higher graduation rates, as a study done by the Center for Arts Education shows. In conclusion, fine arts education is one of the most exceptional programs that schools can support, and as we’ve seen, students enrolled in fine arts show higher graduation rates, have higher passing rates due to Texas’ House Bill 72, and show higher academic achievement and creativity. Fine arts, while only being extracurricular, could be what drives millions of students to college and a high paying
Shankar writes “for Asian American students, the model minority stereotype implies that high academic achievement and excellent conduct are foregone conclusions.” By assuming that academic success is a guarantee and not something that needs the be worked hard for in order to achieve, it can be really damaging for either said of the spectrum. Both students who succeed and students who do not. Shankar continues to say “this stereotype not only keeps same Asian American students from being considered “normal” but also leaves others to struggle to accomplish the high standards associated with the term.” When students fail to reach the high standards put upon them by family or society they are cast out, or stop trying, many of the students interviewed in the Shankar piece decided there was no longer to working hard in school because
Aside from getting a fantastic job, I always thought that that student’s with the highest grades or highest IQ’s were the most successful ones. In the book Outliers, Gladwell slowly began to crumble my faulty beliefs and starts to show me that having the highest IQ doesn’t necessarily mean one will be successful and that you can achieve success no matter what college one goes to. Society began to embed in my mind that I needed to attend a school of high ranking so that I could be successful. How does a school get ranked when they all offer the same Bachelor’s or Associate's Degree? This belief started to break down as I began to become more independent during high school.
Some People Fail in School, but are Successful in Life Introduction Most people think that if you excel in your studies, you will become successful as you will get good jobs, high salary per month and manage to lead a comfortable life in luxury. But that is not the case as the meaning of success varies to different types of people. Some will find that success is having freedom of choosing whatever to wear, and some will find that success is to feel the satisfaction of earning your own money, in your own way. While that may seem to be the case, the definition of success here is “knowing your purpose in life, growing to reach your maximum potential, and sowing seeds that benefit others” (Maxwell, John C, 1947). It is true that by having good grades you will become successful, but in this modern days, even the students who has earned many awards and scholarships are jobless.
This is just one of the ways the authors described the power of incentives and the drastic results they can produce. The authors then introduce the topic of high-stakes testing, which increases a teacher’s incentive for cheating. If a teacher has students that receive poor test scores, the teacher can be passed over for a raise. In extension, if the whole school does not do well then federal funding can be withheld and the teacher could be fired. Teachers can also receive positive incentives for their students to perform better on the high-stakes testing, which include promises of promotions and bonuses (Levitt & Dubner, 2009).
In Kurt Wiesenfeld’s article “Making the Grade”, he address the issue that students want a higher grade than they deserve. He goes on to prove this be by giving examples of previous students that he has had and what can happen when students get the grades that they want and not what they deserve. In Wiesenfeld’s article he states that about ten percent of students that take his class do not care about their grades until final grades are over. “You might groan and moan, but you accepted it as the outcome of your efforts or lack thereof,” Wiesenfeld stated. He also goes on to state “If they’re good at getting partial credit but not at getting the answers right, then the new breaks or the new drug doesn’t work.” He also goes on to give examples
Doesn 't every student just love getting their test folders back and seeing good grades? It 's means you have studied and understood what you 've learned, but does getting paid seem like a good way to honor students who did good? I don 't think that is a good way to praise students who did good. Would you like to get paid if you received good grades? In my opinion students should get paid because it would cause a whole bunch of difficulty.
In addition to the grade point average of students, an individual should be respectable, intelligent, and mature to gain acceptance into National Honor Society. National Honor Society is a widely renowned group that only the top candidates should be admitted to, not just for academic achievement, but for being a genuinely good person. Not only do I believe that I portray these qualities, but I have much more to offer, therefore, I should be considered for admission. Scholarship can be shown in many ways, and is not only limited by grade point average. To me, scholarship can be defined as someone excelling in school by trying their hardest and making an attempt to educate themselves to the best of their ability.
The cuts in arts programs has had the greatest effect on the students. Without the arts programs students would miss out on the benefits of learning about art, drama, music, and foreign language. Some of the benefits they would be missing out on are the relieving qualities of art, the ability to express their emotions, and the advantages in the academic classroom. Studies have shown that having art or music does increase the amount of information a student retains (Hawkins 1). The most prominent positive effect are the core classes like math, science, English, and history will have larger budgets and they will be able to afford the technology and supplies they need to stay up to date in the classroom.