Gun control is now one of the main issues in North America because of all the crimes involving guns in the past decade. Nearly, 25,000 people died due to uncontrollable gun violence in 2005. Americans should oppose government policy about the gun laws because it is a moral duty to ensure safety due to many people are being killed. Throughout the last ten years, the number of mass shooting and innocent people who gave died in the United State has been rising. Gun control advocate reason that more guns lead to more gun crimes, not just a self-defense. People mindlessly use guns to kill other people just because they can. For example, Dylan Roof, an American suspected of Charleston church shooting, who killed nine African Americans including
Anyone that thinks gun control is the answer to the killing that is going on is wrong! Nothing will change until parents start teaching their children right from wrong. Gun Control is too much of a political something you do to win a battle or to get what you want and failing. Politicians talks about the need to increase gun restrictions to stop gun crime, but new and current gun laws are designed to fail in order to allow certain people to own them and make unhappy because of not having a vote others.
Do you think that greater gun control is a good idea? Maybe you’re aware but would you be willing to altercate to a certain extent to make sure your community feels protected? Perhaps you’re willing to get equal rights with gun laws , or just don’t like the idea of anyone being able to purchase and carry guns freely. Why carry a gun if eventually it will be used to innocent people, and for what? For your protection?
Does The U.S. Need Tougher Gun Laws In my opinion i think there should be stricter gun laws because in the Text it says “Guns don't cause crimes, but they do make crimes more lethal” which is true because having a gun can promote violent actions. having stricter gun laws are just to keep america safe. instead of it being possible to get a gun when ever you're going to have to go through background checks. If this law was passed i think it could cause a better future for everybody.
Introduction Gun control is a highly controversial topic that sparks heated debates and discussions worldwide. Supporters argue that stricter gun control laws can reduce violence and save lives, while opponents assert that it infringes upon individuals' Second Amendment rights and fails to address the root causes of gun violence. While proponents of gun control emphasize the importance of public safety and crime reduction, opponents raise concerns regarding constitutional rights and the potential for increased vulnerability. This essay will examine the pros and cons of gun control to provide a comprehensive understanding of this complex issue. Arguments for gun control Gun control plays a pivotal role in preventing gun violence and its devastating consequences.
Gun control laws would actively break the terms of the right to self-defense and it would also deny people a sense of safety. According to the National Rifle Association (NRA), guns are used for self-defense two point five million times a year, the police cannot protect everyone all of the time. Fifty one percent of men and fifty six percent of women surveyed by Pew Research said that stricter gun laws would ‘make it more difficult for people to protect their homes and families’ (ProCon.org 3). When people own guns it gives them a sense of safety because they can protect themselves with said
Lott continues on to mention that Even after accounting for factors such as law enforcement, poverty, and demographics, each percentage point increase in gun ownership produces a four percent drop in violent crime. Backing the claim that, “States with higher gun ownership rates have much lower crime rate” (Lott 29). Lott also mentions that Countries with the strictest gun control laws tend to have the highest homicide rate. This once again shows a correlation between a higher gun ownership rate and a lower violence rate. Mauser and Kates also support Lotts claims by explaining, “Where firearms are most dense violent crime rates are the lowest, and where guns are least dense violent crime rates are the highest” (Kates, Mauser 649).
The debate over gun control has caused a great amount of attention from the media in the past five years. When Adam Lanza killed 20 first-graders and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., before taking his own life in one of the nation 's most horrific mass shootings. There have been marches and protests, Super Bowl advertisements, emotional and contentious congressional and state hearings and a new, tough gun-control law. This year alone there has been over 11,000 deaths related to gun violence. Along with those deaths there has been a combined 20,000 injuries.
Now is the time to pull the trigger on limiting gun control. With the events that have happened in recent years, many look at gun control as the answer. The problem is just as these events polarize the public, and provide an outcry for preventing them; guns have helped stop violence from occurring in schools and shops from Mississippi to Pennsylvania (Wilson). Heading the main argument for not advancing gun control is self-defense, which gins being used for self-defense occurs between 100,000 and two million times a year. As Wilson states in his article, even outright bans and incredibly tough rules do not stop these events from occurring, such as in England, France, and Germany.
This is not the only side of the argument, though, there are opposers to enforcing gun laws that believe that there are already enough laws for buying guns and what you can do with them. The opposers also believe that we should focus more of our efforts on the mental health of the people instead of the guns they use. The debate on gun control is a very pressing matter. Some believe that the laws on gun control should be stricter, while others believe the laws should be looser for self-defense and hunting. Of course, homicides and accessibility of guns are not the only topics the public focuses on.
Today, America is dealing with an epidemic. Our society has allowed guns to be an easily accessible item. While deaths associated with guns are becoming a normality in the United States, far too many innocent lives are being taken away at the speed of a bullet. Although many oppose gun control due to the 2nd amendment, the Supreme Court has shown its support.
Gun Control Gun control has become a polarizing and controversial issue around the globe. There have been many reported issues of mass shootings both in schools and in the public, making it a hot button issue. Proponents argue that, if the government strictly controls the ownership of guns, such tragedies can be prevented. Most Americans have an obsession with guns because the law allows them to do so. Therefore, they are always ready to scoff at anyone trying to control gun ownership.
The use of and the owning of guns is a very hot and debated topic in society today. For many, this is a life and death debate due to the recent and numerous school shootings. These school shootings have caused an outcry for more gun control, specifically in relation to the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Despite these calls, increased gun control is not the answer. Most gun owners’ use their guns responsibly and for good purposes.
American’s political landscape has been dominated by two major political parties that immensely differ in a number of key issues that affect every aspect of American life. This divide between the Democrat and Republican party could not be more pronounced than now during the presidential debate with each candidate taking a strong and clear stance on some major issues such as healthcare, immigration, and gun control. The Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton advocates for a more progressive and socialist agenda. She believes that the government should ensure all citizens are taken care of by providing access to affordable healthcare to everyone.
Since Oregon ‘s massacre that occurred two months ago, the debate over the cause of the U.S.’s unparalleled gun violence has re-emerged. Some American citizen are with put stricter Guns Control laws and some of them are against put stricter Guns Control laws. “The United States has 90 guns for every 100 citizens, making it the most heavily armed society in the world, with American citizens owning about 270 million of the world’s 875 million firearms”( McInnis,2007). Indeed, this is more than a quarter of the world’s registered firearms. It has seemed as if Americans have always had an obsession with owning guns.
The number of incidents of gun violence last year in the United States was about 60,000. In recent years, the number of mass shooting has risen to about one mass shooting per day in the United States. The country is divided with some wanting to reevaluate our gun control laws and either ban or add additional regulations to the purchase of guns. Others say it is our right for Americans to own guns and something the founding fathers considered important to put in the Bill of Rights. The number of firearm sales has risen with the number of mass shooting many Americans question if banning guns or certain guns could help decrease the number of gun violence deaths.