ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Chimpanzees

1236 Words5 Pages

With the development of legal systems and the end of the Second World War, human beings pay more and more attention to their undeniable rights. Many struggles have done in order to achieve the equality of human rights and to against the violence of them within humans. However, whether human rights only belongs to human beings is a controversial issue. There are various opinions about if chimpanzees, which are the most complex non-human animals(Waldau & Whitman, 2002), also deserve human rights. This paper would argue that chimpanzees should be granted some of the basic human rights. Firstly, the content of existing human rights would be introduced. Secondly, chimpanzees’ right to not to be subjected to torture or to cruel, and the right of liberty would be justified. Lastly, the article would discuss whether the fact that chimpanzees cannot take any responsibility for their action can prevent them from having the two human rights depicted above. …show more content…

However, it is unclear that whether these rights can only be obtained by humans. Clearly, some of these rights only belongs to humans because they require complicated cultural or religious system (e.g. Article 18), or organized, developed and controlled society (e.g. Article 21) to operate. Nevertheless, there are some other basic human rights which can also be applied to higher animals like chimpanzees. In the following two paragraphs, the qualification of chimpanzees to have the right to not being tortured or brutalized and the right of liberty would be

Show More
Related

  • Jeremy Rifkin's A Change Of Heart About Animals

    969 Words  | 4 Pages

    Animals who are able to surpass these barriers are able to receive our empathy and their rights, but in Jeremy Rifkin’s, “A Change of Heart About Animals,” he talks ideas about all animals should receive our empathy for great acts of the few. The individual animal receive its equal rights, not by a single entity achieving it for the mass, but by the individual must showing intelligences, emotions and feelings, and most importantly, the ability to co-exist with others; including human and other animals alike. An animal must show intelligences, the ability to communicate, solve problems, and follow simple instructions. In “A Change of Heart About Animals,” Rifkin refers to a gorilla, named Koko, who learned sign language.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Night By Elie Wiesel

    717 Words  | 3 Pages

    (104-105). Seeing that there is still indifference in the world and seeing that after many years people are still fighting for their rights, It can be presumed that Humans have not changed. To conclude, human rights cannot be actualized for every person because of the lack of compassion people have for others. To achieve human rights for all people, everyone would need to understand one another and accept each other’s differences.

    Read More

  • Martin Luther King And Socrates Similarities

    695 Words  | 3 Pages

    Every human being created by God has natural rights

    Read More

  • Un Charter Dbq

    796 Words  | 4 Pages

    These human rights 'instruments', as they are called, have fixed how many rights apply to particular groups of human beings such as women or children. They have also come up with new ideas that were not part of the thinking of those who first drafted the Universal Declaration. The link between human rights and other pillars is clearly evident all the way through the UDHR. First, it allows, in the Preamble, that the credit of the unchallengeable rights of all people is the groundwork of freedom, justice and peace across the world. Secondly, it expands the UN Charter’s stated purpose of encouraging growth by giving economic, social and cultural rights the in the same degree of safety that an individual finds for civil and political rights (Marshall

    Read More

  • Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals

    862 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many Americans blindly believe that animals deserve the same rights as humans, but little do they know about the differences between the welfare of animals and the rights of animals. In the article A Change of Heart about Animals, Jeremy Rifkin cleverly uses certain negative words in order to convince the readers that animals need to be given same rights as humans, and if not more. Research has shown that non-human animals have the ability to “feel pain, suffer and experience stress, affection, excitement and even love” (Rifkin 33). Animals may be able to feel emotions, however this does not necessarily mean that they are able to understand what having rights mean. While humans must accept their moral responsibility to properly care for animals,

    Read More

  • Why Primates Are Better Than Other Mammals

    681 Words  | 3 Pages

    Due to the intellectual level of primates there parenting skills differ from other mammals. Primates birth fewer off spring than other mammals because there births are spaced out over time to account for teaching and nurturing the newborns. Primates tend to take much better care of there infants with mothering qualities due to there intelligence which is far different than other mammals who sometimes give birth and leave there young. Primates care for there offspring much more than other mammals and do things that more closely resemble the care humans have when it comes to parenting as oppose to animals like dolphins and other mammals. There are six types of social groups which primates follow.

    Read More

  • Bonnie Steinbock's Argument Analysis

    782 Words  | 4 Pages

    In this paper, I will focus on Bonnie Steinbock’s claim on whether or not we should give equal moral consideration to species outside our own species group. I will first determine what moral concern means, according to Peter singer, and explain how he views the human treatment of animals. I will then outline Steinbock’s argument against Singer’s position and explain how her criticism is part of a much broader issue: that is moral concern. I will finally make my argument against Steinbock as well as address any issues she could possibly raise against my argument. Peter Singer believed that all species, whether it be human or non-human, deserve equal consideration of interests and quality of life.

    Read More

  • Machan's Arguments Against Animal Rights

    1408 Words  | 6 Pages

    It is argued then that because of this, do infants and the mentally-challenged not have rights either? While this is a plausible objection, it fails, because Machan’s argument doesn’t attribute rights to just moral agents, his argument attributes rights specifically to all humans. Machan constructs his argument on the basis that rights are attributed to species or kinds, not by individuals. He makes it clear that this is the correct way to attribute rights by his examination of nature’s hierarchy. He describes that kinds of things are what are judged on a similar basis.

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of All Animals Are Equal By Peter Singer

    673 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the article All Animals Are Equal, written by Peter Singer addresses the inadequacies surrounding the rights of animals in the societies of today. Singer opens the article by presenting a scholarly parallels between the fight for gender equality, banishment of racism and the establishment of rights for “nonhumans.” In order to explain this constant set of inequalities that seem to riddle our society, Singer readily uses the term “speciesism”, which he acquired from a fellow animals rights advocator, Richard Ryder. Essentially, this term is defined by Singer as a prejudice or attitude of bias in favor of the interests of members of one's own species and against those of members of other species. Singer claims that if this idea of speciesism

    Read More

  • Analysis Of All Animals Are Equal By Peter Singer

    1170 Words  | 5 Pages

    In human history, a number of oppressed groups have campaigned for equality, demanding for an expansion on the moral view of life, and to be treated fairly in the eye of consideration. This means that when the matter concerns this group, their voices are heard, and treated with value, and consideration. Where this equality is not determined by an assembly of facts like that group’s collective intelligence level, the colour of their skin, or the physical strength of their bodies. This is what Peter Singer brings up in his essay: “All Animals are Equal”, that non-human animals should have equal consideration with humans when matters concern them. Going into a specific set of non-human animals known as primates, I argue that primates should have some of the fundamental rights and equal consideration that are given to humans.

    Read More

  • Primates And Personhood Summary

    355 Words  | 2 Pages

    The article, “Of Primates and Personhood: Will According Rights and “Dignity” to Nonhuman Organisms Halt Research?” by Ed Yong is trying to convince the reader to see a different side to primates. The Great Ape Project set legal rights for chimpanzees, gorillas, bonobos, and orangutan. United Kingdom and New Zealand protect great apes from experimentation. For the Great Ape Project they are basically setting laws and higher standards for primates to me experimented on or held captive.

    Read More

  • Nvq Level 2 Unit 2 Health And Social Care Values

    1878 Words  | 8 Pages

    Unit 2 HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE VALUE Learning aim A explore the care value that underpin current practice in health and social care We have done role play with young people with disabilities and old people and we demonstrate Confidentiality Dignity, Respect for the individual Safeguarding duty of care A person-centered approach to care delivery. Young people with a disability it was ok, we done with them how to decoration make Christmas card we down because Christmas is coming soon so we decided in group that we will do with them Christmas care and degradation it was very fun and there are very happy I use only some of them because we don't have enough time to play but still I use much I can.i have improved more about this. Aim A:Valuing

    Read More

  • Essay On Australian Constitution

    517 Words  | 3 Pages

    It gives a complete list of all the things that we can do, and the rights that we have. Human rights are an important part of how people interact with others at all levels in society - in the family, the community, schools, the workplace & politics. Although we may not recognize them, the rights admitted in the Constitution are the main reason we can be individuals and believe in what best suits our ambitions and well-being. They are designed to ensure that each person can to live with dignity; free from fear, persecution and violence; productively; and harmoniously alongside others. This is why they are so important to us as a community and as

    Read More

  • Should Animal Testing Be Banned

    967 Words  | 4 Pages

    Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.

    Read More

  • Characteristics Of Human Rights

    985 Words  | 4 Pages

    Human Rights What are Human Rights? Human Rights are commonly understood as being those rights which are inherent to the human being. The concept of human rights acknowledges that every single human being is entitled to enjoy his or her human rights without distinction as to race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Human rights are legally guaranteed by human rights law, protecting individuals and groups against actions which interfere with fundamental freedom and human dignity. They are expressed in treaties, customary international law, bodies of principles and other sources of law.

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Chimpanzees

Open Document