Results
Historically Vygotsky (1978) states that for the cohesion of a group educators need to ‘Plan social interactions—group projects, cooperative activities, role-play, debates, and discussions—provide more practice and enhance student learning through common experiences’. Focus on Inquiry provides practical guidance and advice on the types of inquiry activities best suited to different types of learners (Alberta Education, 2004).
Findings from Darling-Hammond (2008) mention ‘Newly emerging insights and empirical findings in the learning sciences suggest that traditional approaches to education that emphasize the ability to recall disconnected facts and follow prescribed set of rules and operations should be replaced by “learning that enables
…show more content…
Friesen et al (2013) supplemental evidence ‘As outlined by the Galileo Educational Network (2008) rubric to guide inquiry and supported by a large body of research, a constellation of processes needs to be in place to maximize the impact on inquiry-based education. These elements include scaffolding activities, formative feedback loops, and the adoption of powerful questioning strategies to guide the learning process’. There consists a strength of evidence where we can prove through examination that a social constructive approach to learning remains preferable to traditional liberal education lecture style methods of teaching. A transfer of knowledge continues optimal when students are engaged in making decisions about their learning, but passively absorbing information persists as an approach still often used today since we can easily record data that makes instructors look accountable to stakeholders throughout the education field. Research questions that clearly state inquiry based learning proves superior to other methods gives my research paper an advantage by stating that learning theories apply to the overall development of students. My paper not only compares a case study of American and Korean education systems, but has an agenda that aims to prove student centered learning to be a preferred method of instruction for learners, parents, teachers and stakeholders. What we adduce to as traditional schooling Kohn (2008) verifies ‘has been largely the result of outdated policy changes. Progressive educators are concerned with helping children become superior learners and congenial people. Schooling isn’t just academics, nor intellectual growth limited to verbal and mathematical proficiency, but rather a system where children learn
From a young age white students hear that their Asian American classmates are smarter and are pushed much harder from their parents to succeed, and in turn they know that these students will always be better. This driving force from adults happens because of the discrimination in the past towards Asians. They feel as though they need to prove that they too can be great. This pressure can have negative effects on an Asian American student’s schooling experience. Not only do these students have to keep up with their parent’s standards, they also have the added pressure of the thoughts and assumptions put in place by their peers.
Basic, Boring, and Plain are just three words of how to never describe the thought provoking research book, The Smartest Kids in the World, by the author, Amanda Ripley, who logically argues that education must be reformed. She mainly underscores the need to apply the revolutionizing techniques that she deliberately unveils to the audience with a hurl of statistics and appealing testimonies from foreign exchange students to the very developed nation: The United States. Ripley urges the nation to implement more rigor into students’ coursework, hire highly educated teachers, and hold both teachers and students accountable for results in order to prepare students for the flood of trenches that lay ahead. The author quickly grasps the attention of the reader by presenting three unlikely candidates, Finland, Poland, and South Korea, as her main role models of a good educational system that the modern world should learn from.
I deliberately developed my activities that mostly require students to work in small groups or pair work with students of mixed abilities because of the advantages that group work has on peer teaching and learning. In framing my activities, I considered whether they promote high order thinking, cater for the diverse needs of students and address the Cross Curricular Priorities and General Capabilities as stipulated by the Australian Curriculum (AC) within the context of AC: History. My activities also hinges on the first two goals of the Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians (MCEETYA, 2008) Throughout my activities, I considered what I want students to know (content), the skills I wanted students to gain, (historical
However, with standardized testing still in place, there is no presence of authentic learning. Without authentic learning students become rote learners like robots trained for the next cue, blindly endangering the bright future ahead of
Within the realm of education, there are numerous ideologies that may be utilized to construct a curriculum. Several of these ideologies are more prominent than others. With this in mind, there are four main ideologies that are analyzed more frequently than others; these include Scholar Academic, Social Efficiency, Learner-Centered, and Social Reconstruction. Throughout this paper, the focal point will be assessing how these views are applied, both inside and outside the classroom.
The purpose of group learning and development is to ensure that all learning styles are catered for and the ultimate goal of sharing knowledge is achieved. When using a group to deliver something new each individual can call on a fellow participant to confirm understanding. 1.2 Explain why delivery of learning and development must reflect group dynamics When delivering to a group it is important to consider, what is the normal behaviour within the group? Who plays what role?
Cooperative learning model is an active process where students work in small teams/groups, each with students of different levels of ability, use a variety of learning activities to improve their understanding of a subject. Students have opportunities to actively participate in their learning, question and challenge each other, share and discuss their ideas, and adopt their learning. Ross and Smyth (1995) describe successful cooperative learning tasks as intellectually demanding, creative, open-ended, and involve higher order thinking tasks. In this model, it is essential to create a positive climate where interpersonal skills can be promoted so that positive emotions will be fostered among learners. Cooperative learning also helps the learners to feel empowered and respected to prepare them to face real
My Classroom Environment Ideally, my classroom would be a strong community of interactive learners. I would like to use cooperative learning to engage students at various academic levels. This would also give me the opportunity to employ direct teaching for those students that need it while others work in groups. Groups also allows me to use peer tutoring and help build an inclusive classroom by integrating groups (Hallahan et al., 2012).
Though there have been many philosophies of education over the years, there are two that encompass my belief system most, traditional and progressive. Most educators do not believe both philosophies can exist at the same time; however, during my study it became apparent that the two philosophies do not have to be mutually exclusive. In sharing my personal philosophy of education, I will share the benefits of both theories and how I would like to see them combined for the benefit of my school and
[47] argue that students report increased team skills as a result of cooperative learning. This is as Panitz [48] cites a number of benefits of cooperative learning for developing the interpersonal skills required for effective teamwork. As observed, there is broad empirical support for the central premise of cooperative learning, that cooperation is more effective than competition for promoting a range of positive learning outcomes. These results include enhanced academic achievement and a number of attitudinal outcomes. In addition, cooperative learning provides a natural environment in which to enhance interpersonal skills and there are rational arguments and evidence to show the effectiveness of cooperation in this
At the conclusion, they will discuss the process that was taken and evaluate their findings with the class or teacher. This time allows them to express their experience and voice their opinion on the matter. It may be so, that he or she has become quite passionate about it which means he or she has learned from the inquiry (Guido 2017). The group inquiry process to learning I was in, allowed me to think quite intently on historical events that affected New Zealand society, the objective of the inquiry was to gather information using critical thinking and delving deep to finding a greater meaning to why legislation came about because of
Evolving methodologies for curriculum and instruction are essential to improving how we educate. McMillian positions that essential to this is understanding the value of scientific inquiry. He explains, “the principles of scientific inquiry provide the foundation for conducting studies…analyzing educational problems, making decisions, and designing, conducting, reporting, and evaluating” (McMillian, 2016, p. 7) to provide significant benefits for engaging students and affecting achievement. Among the changing methodologies is the consensus that the use of STEM-education concepts are necessary to prepare students for 21st century skill-building. Subsequently, this has led to an instructional methodology that highlights math-centered curriculum, and the instruction of science and technology as independent of core content.
As pedagogical education changes, it is my responsibility to learn and integrate appropriate learning theories into my teaching practice. As teaching is steering away from traditional paper pencil tasks, I try to implement more inquiry based teacher practices in my lessons where students are forced to use critical thinking skills to solve problems. Element 3.1.1 - 3.1.4 Teachers are responsible for creating a learning environment that allows students to feel safe, welcomed and supportive. A classroom culture is fostered by the teacher who establishes the rules. In a diverse classroom setting, it is important to set boundaries and rules.
Sadker & Sadker (2017) believes that, “behind every school and every teacher is a set of related beliefs--a philosophy of education--that influences what and how students are taught. A philosophy of education represents answers to questions about the purpose of schooling, a teacher's role, and what should be taught and by what methods” (Chapter 9). I seek to adopt the progressivism approach. Progressive education rejects traditional education as it is child-centred and not subject-centred (Reedy, 2017). My Philosophy of education requires me to ask myself questions on why do I teach, what do I teach and how do I teach.
It is one of the most effective forms of learning. Working in isolation is very restrictive and gives a slow progress. Critical thinking is also encouraged when learners work in groups. Through collaborative activities such as writing, debates, group projects and more they learn to work together and to respect each other contribution. The traditional relationship between student and teacher is changed with collaborative learning.