“In science, novelty emerges only with difficulty, manifested by resistance, against a background provided by expectations”. —Thomas S.Kuhn (The Structure of Scientific Revolutions) I use this quote by Kuhn, (1962) as the backdrop for the relevance and need of interdisciplinary research in making science work for society through a two-way flow of knowledge between science and society. Real world problems are complex and attempts of any one discipline to address these problems result in solutions that are either insufficient or not adaptable to real world situations (IOM, 2000a). Research seeking real world solutions for real world problems need to be based on an interdisciplinary perspective, with multiple disciplines complementing and contributing …show more content…
A survey conducted in 1980, by Sigma Xi- The Scientific Research Committee among its members about the need for interdisciplinary research funding for scientific problems that do not fit within arbitrary disciplinary structures, show 75 percent of the respondents reporting they either ‘agreed’ or ‘agreed emphatically’ (IOM, 2000b). But despite this agreement, traditionally, there has been a persistent barrier to interdisciplinary research from the scientific community, even when all of the complementing disciplines fall in the realm of natural sciences. These barriers to interdisciplinary research collaborations ranges from being attitudinal barriers at the individual level to shared fear across the scientific community of research being graded second rate when it is not dealt with from within one disciplinary boundary. This is expressed by Dr.Paul Smolensky (IOM, 2000b) when he says that, ‘disciplines have been able to investigate a given subject in depth. But when research bridges disciplines and this same depth cannot be attained, the quality of the research is perceived as poor’ . While this has been the case of interdisciplinary research …show more content…
Interdisciplinary research teams are best led by people who themselves have a strong interdisciplinary background and show interest in a wide range of subjects. Respect for other disciplines, willingness to promote success of other disciplines is other essential leadership traits for successful interdisciplinary collaboration (Bruce et.al., 2004). Collaborators in an inter-disciplinary team need to be open minded, willing to learn from other disciplines and appreciate the research methods and cultures of the different disciplines (Lyall and Meagher, 2007; Lyall and Tait,
M1, Introduction There is always a question which can’t be answered by scientist all of which relate to the perceptions of science as there is difference in how science is currently addressed. Also, people have different believes, opinions and interpretation of science in general. Questions science is currently addressing- cure for cancer?
They should also consider how challenges are dealt with, Look at the research, and how science is believed and proven by the experiments, research and the actual progress that science has made. https://www.verywell.com/what-is-a-pseudoscience-2795470?utm_term=pseudoscience+examples&utm_content=p1-main-1-title&utm_medium=sem&utm_source=msn_s&utm_campaign=adid-276ea10e-583a-4cc8-af66-0d83d166a6c6-0-ab_mse_ocode-35484&ad=semD&an=msn_s&am=exact&q=pseudoscience+examples&o=35484&qsrc=999&l=sem&askid=276ea10e-583a-4cc8-af66-0d83d166a6c6-0-ab_mse
The fervent ideal-searching that entails scientific research is an endeavor that encompasses not only intellectual bounds but also the mental and emotional fixtures present in the mind of a scientific pioneer. Mere thoughts and notions become materialized tools and obstacles, and the journey that takes place within becomes the foundation by which scientific theory is ascertained. Wielding thoughts as stepping stones is crucial to the duty of the scientist, and even a degree of uncertainty must be harnessed for success and improvement. In this excerpt from The Great Influenza, John M. Barry pieces together a passionate study on the character of scientific research through the artful use of rhetorical strategies including syntax, hypothetical
In the passage from John M. Barry’s The Great Influenza, Barry makes us of an extended metaphor of scientific research as an unexplored wilderness, a motif of uncertainty, a comprehensible diction and admiring tone, and bookended explanatory paragraphs to characterize scientific research as a courageous pursuit to bring order from chaos. Throughout the piece, Barry develops the metaphor in a fashion which closely parallels the steps of the scientific method, giving the reader a better understanding of the work of scientists. In an effort to promote scientific research to the general public, he focuses on its positive aspects and the character traits of scientists. In order to appeal to a wide audience, Barry uses an extended metaphor to compare the seemingly abstract and unreachable concept of scientific research to the mentally attainable image of pioneers settling a virgin wilderness.
The passage from John M. Barry’s The Great Influenza explores the significance of certainty and uncertainty to scientific experimentation and research. The author’s employment of metaphor, repetition, and semantic inversion helps to reinforce the claim that, “to be a scientist requires not only intelligence and curiosity, but passion, patience, creativity, self-sufficiency, and courage”. Barry opens the passage with two back-to-back examples of anaphora; these examples of repetition lay a direct emphasis on the strengths that certainty creates, along with the weaknesses that uncertainty creates. According to the author, “certainty gives one something upon which to lean” and “uncertainty makes one tentative if not fearful, and tentative steps, even when in the right direction, may not overcome significant obstacles”.
Prospero vs Mond If we follow Mond’s story, we see a slight parallel with Watson: both eventually discover the inadequacies of the World State’s system. Because Mond was curious, he was discontented with society’s values, and thus experiments beyond what is socially acceptable. He does this through scientific experimentation: Such an act is considered a form of active rebellion against the society which prohibits any deviation from their norms, and like Watson, he is offered a choice to stay and give up his activities, or be exiled to an island. Unlike Watson, interestingly, he chooses to stay. However, it is by no means proof that he has internalized society’s values and goals.
Given this gap, it is suggested that if we are able to identify the readiness of a practitioner to collaborate before entering into a team, some of these challenges will be addressed and the subsequent team will have fewer difficulties working together. For example, a valid and effective tool for predicting interprofessional readiness of potential team members will allow us to address potential barriers to interprofessional team
This is in part due to the recent increase of writings about “distrust of science from professionals in different fields such as journalists, scientists, physicians, psychologists, and sociologists. “While this work contains valuable insights and perspectives on the problem, many authors make sweeping generalizations and lump together disparate questions that involve different methodologies and types of evidence” (Kabat). The infiltration of conspiracies in the academic world is causing contradictory viewpoints to clash with one another. As these viewpoints increase, the truth will only become more muddled. “Rejection of critical probing when the results are inconvenient, a tolerance for “alternative facts,” and an ahistorical and partisan-grounded attitude toward (scientific) issues are all manifestations of this trend, which is particularly severe”
The beauty of working in healthcare is when physicians, practitioners and other disciplinary can work together as professional. Interprofessional collaboration is when a health care professional can collective work together as a team in a positive and respect environment (Sangster-Gormley, 2015). Collaborative team members are not threatened by each other, they exchange their knowledge and expertise (Sangster-Gormley, 2015). They flow in a constructive environment that foster positive decision-making and problem-solving. Collaboration is a major factor in successful Nurse practitioner integration (Sangster-Gormley, 2015).
This is why programs such as Kilachand Honors College are important, because interdisciplinary education brings in new ideas, connecting lessons learned from different areas of knowledge. This leads to a greater
As with any type of group work, disagreements are likely to surface; but that’s why I have experience managing large groups of people and dealing with problems and complicated ideas. If needed be, I will step up and make myself useful, whether it is in a classroom setting, a lab, or the workplace. I am also determined to work side-by-side with people who have the same fascination with academics and who want to see the same change in the world as I do; but first, I have to start by graduating from
Modern science is typically subdivided into the natural sciences, which study the material world, the social sciences which study people and societies, and the formal sciences like mathematics. The formal sciences are often excluded as they do not depend on empirical observations.[5] We have to keep in mind that science helps us describe how the world is, but it cannot make any judgments about whether that state of affairs is right, wrong, good, or bad and individual people must make moral judgments.
Research philosophy Research philosophy lay down the background of how researchers understand the world, the choice of research philosophy reflect our knowledge, experiences, preconceptions, and research capability. Thus our knowledge, experiences and etc., which underpin the philosophy choice, will determine our research paradigm, strategy, design and method. (Saunders et al., 2009, p. 128-129).
There must also be recognition among stakeholders that each singular discipline, once integrated within an interdisciplinary framework of other disciplines, greatly increases the potential for collaboration, knowledge-building, and problem-solving when developing new approaches to environmental
Chapter two; Literature Review The entire research journey is based on few important steps which can also be recognized as research process involving certain measures; to be carried out effectively. This process includes (Library, 2015); 1. Framing of a particular research question 2. searching and examining the relevant literature studies 3. Management of the accumulated search data 4.