A free internet is not one that is unregulated nor is one that is strictly regulated. There exists an elusive measure existing the spectrum that must be fulfilled without tainting the uniqueness of the internet. Two key features of a free internet, net neutrality and online freedom of speech, must be maintained throughout.
The internet, as it is now, has paved a new path for communication in the modern era. Since its inception the internet has stood by a simple rule, all data is equal. Through the implementation of legislation and policies this simple rule may however be changed so that certain data may be prioritized. This would exclusively benefit telecommunications corporations while diminishing the ability of the general user. Total net …show more content…
In order to ensure their steady control over this vast amount of people the Chinese government must control them by regulating the worlds most intertwined and complex communication system in the modern era, the internet. A guideline to the China's leading party is strict regulation in every aspect of the internet. In the past couple years a revitalized mission for control against internet freedom has emerged. The foremost problem in China is internet censorship. The Chinese government has several regulatory bodies in charge of internet censorship, among them being the State Council Information office, the Cyber space Administration of China, and finally the State Administration of Press, Publications, Radio, Film, and Television. These government bodies were created to maintain a so called "cyberspace sovereignty" controlled by the State. The main topic of controversy among the internet landscape of China is its strict limitations and restrictions on content deemed sensitive. Any content found to be incompatible with State propaganda, protest against key political figures or ideologies held by China's one party system will be swiftly censored by both well-oiled automated computers …show more content…
However the article also states that fabrication or distortion of facts is prohibited. When every complaint is then censored and obstructed from viewing how is it that citizens are able to freely practice this right. The government has over interpreted their capabilities to end false accusation to extend to complete black out of any form of criticism. The interest of the state, as found in article 51, may not be infringed upon by the citizens of China in exercising their freedoms. This however has gone too far. The internet has the capabilities to amass people for a cause, to send a message that will be seen by many, and to be a voice in the discussion in the development of a nation. Yet China has disconnected its people from its true realization and given them nothing more than a
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
“Black Code: Surveillance, Privacy, and the Dark Side of the Internet,” written by Ronald J. Deibert, outlines different issues and benefits that have arised due to the growing use of the internet. Deibert begins his essay providing information about the internet such as the rapid growth of smartphones, how the internet has taken over most of societies lives, and key differences between previous technological innovations compared to the internet. He continues his essay by discussing the U.S.A. Patriot Act and how this law should be retracted based on the fact that various companies, like Google, can give the government our personal searches if they ask. Then, he talks about various types of cyber crimes and how we need stronger regulations to control the internet so these crimes would not be possible. Deibert concludes his essay explaining how the internet has provided many benefits in today’s nation, but the internet needs stricter regulations for our own protection.
The government is involved in the Chinese Exclusion Acts so it makes their perspective pose a potential bias, the government can be defending and hiding things within the source to save its reputation. The limitations of the purpose of the source arise through the possibility of the government using the source to clear its name and show how the Chinese Exclusion Acts were resolved which makes the sole motive for publishing the document, saving the reputation of the government after the acts. The limitations of content are emphasized when looking into how it impacted people because the acts simply do not highlight the reality of the Chinese Exclusion Acts which could pose a limitation to understanding the events that occurred because the documents only provide the context of
Net-neutrality is the principle that providers of Internet services enable access to all contents with no prejudice or discrimination against sites or products regardless of the source. In December, the U.S. government repealed the national regulations that prevented “Internet Service Providers from blocking legal content, throttling traffic or prioritizing content on their broadband networks” in favor of a “looser set of requirements that ISPs disclose any blocking or prioritization of their own content.” In summary, the government has decided to change net-neutrality and make it easier to profit from. The government’s want, and subsequent success, to change the strict guidelines by which net-neutrality operated with is supported by the Chairman
The Federal Government Regulating Information on the Internet When it comes to internet censorship, it is a split argument whether limiting access on the web is a positive or negative solution. Having no buffer on internet users can lead to various threats and extreme false news and advertising. Many people debate that having the internet censored is violating freedom of speech, yet having no limits leads to threats and extreme false news and advertising. Other issues begin to arise when there is no barrier such as human trafficking and other various harmful content that can be found without any difficulty.
With the world population being 7,259,902,243 people, a grossly huge amount of people use the Internet, the number being 3,366,261,156 people worldwide. That ends up being almost half of the population, the percentage being 46.4% I one hundred percent disagree with the “decision” of the government ridding of the Internet entirely, as if that isn't clear enough already. Though the government might find the termination of the Internet useful in some circumstances, I have no doubt that it may result in riots, violence, protests, and more in order to get it
Starting to question if Google was endorsing censorship by conforming to the Chinese authorities’ rules, even though this decision went against their stated corporate philosophy • MacLean has only one day before attending a meeting where he would be questioned on the development and implementation of Google’s China strategy and asked for his suggestions for future courses of action Inferences about the facts –
NET NEUTRALITY: Net Neutrality is also known as Open Internet and Internet Neutrality. Net neutrality is the principle that to treat all the data on the internet in same way by Internet Service Providers (ISP) not discriminate or changing differently by users, applications, and websites. OPEN INTERNET: The idea of an open internet is that all the resources of the internet to operate it easily by each individual and companies; this includes ideas like net neutrality and transparency.
That’s why Internet is used by more than 150 million people. Internet is a kind of technology which creates a new world. And we call that world as virtual world. In virtual world every real world user has the same rights. The fun part is that there is rule in virtual world.
Which would violate our freedom of speech and freedom of press. Now the government should have control to the extent where they aren 't taking down opinions and posts because they don 't like it. Thankfully the government has restrictions on what they can do to the internet. They cannot take down opinions but they do have access to our
Media Censorship: Good or bad? On the last decades, the freedom of speech has become one of the most discussed and relevant topics inside general population and governments. When it comes to human basic rights, it is clear that the free and open shared of information and communication between all parts plays an important role to ensure a healthy development and progress. However, to think that every country will be willing to spread all kinds of ideas and opinions without placing a boundary would be a utopian assumption.
Censorship is all about deciding on what people can see with in the media that revolves around the world. Censorship puts a wall around harmful, sensitive or inconvenient speech or communication. All around the world censorship has taken place to limit certain material to the public that leaders didn’t want them seeing or listening to. According to Mob Notes, it states, “Two-thirds of the world 's internet users live under regimes of government censorship” (Mob Notes). Restrictions to media around the world could bring positive and negative outcomes to society.
Furthermore, in many developing countries or in those with oppressive regimes, government actions are more important than the Internet in defining how information is produced and consumed, and by whom. There are so many counties that use strict censorship in their media. “Present-day examples include Russia as a territorially shrunken successor state to the former USSR, China and North Korea” (Höchli, 2010). Censorship in North Korea is known to be the most intense among the world. With a government such as theirs, they are able to take strict control over communications.
The People’s Republic of China, governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), has arguably one of the most restrictive media systems in the world. The government censors all venues of media to maintain its monopoly on power and information while pushing ambitious economic modernization reforms. The media system in China is very different, but not totally different from the systems in all other countries in the world.
A bit of both? Well, it’s not your fault because that’s exactly what half the world’s human population is coping with right now. For starters, Censorship is that omnipresent power which restricts contents on a webpage for being harmful, objectionable, obscene, ethnically provoking or unlawful by keeping a track of your account activity, your posts, your comments, uploads and pictures. Censorship works on many levels.