In recent years, ethical treatment and representation of LGBT people has evolved in the United States. Initiatives in schools to reduce harm and stigma and getting the mental health they need have all helped However, there are ethical issues for LGBT people concerning education, religious institutions, and counseling, as well as concerns about First Amendment rights.
One ethical issue for LGBT people is their treatment in schools. Organizations such as the American Psychological Association, the National Association of Social Workers, and the National Association of School Psychologists, call on schools to “promote awareness, acceptance, and accommodation of LGBTQ students and their needs” (Meyer & Bayer, pg. 1764). The idea that LGBT
…show more content…
255). With that definition, it can be said that those within the counseling profession are being discriminatory if they treat people with an LGBT identity less favorably than they would other clients. There are standards and codes that counseling professionals must follow when treating or deciding to treat an LGBT patient. The CACREP standards have sexual orientation included in a category of multicultural diversity. It requires counselors to understand their role in "eliminating biases, prejudices, and processes of intentional and unintentional discrimination” (Herlihy, pg. 151). The ACA 's Code of Ethics does not allow counselors to condone or engage in discrimination that is based on sexual orientation. That was enforced in the 2010 Keeton v. Anderson-Wiley court case. In this case, Augusta State University counseling student Jennifer Keeton expressed desires to refuse treatment of LGBT patients and subject them to conversion therapy, and then refused to go through a remediation course required by the university. Keeton was then dismissed, and the court case ruled that the university she was at did not violate her First Amendment rights (Lambda Legal). Keeton was dismissed because of her refusal to set aside her personal beliefs, and her refusal to counsel LGBT clients. Barbara Herlihy explains, "the faculty relied on professional codes of ethics and accreditation standards in determining that the students were engaging in unacceptable discriminatory behavior” (pg. 151). The case emphasized the need to promote the well-being of all students, and LGBT students are more likely to feel unsafe in school. Any actions that the school counselors take have a significant impact on the students ' mental health (Lambda
These can also result to various forms of violence toward the LGBTQ individual from verbal and physical violence to neglect.
The following social policies and macro issues impact Neveah’s case: education, child mental health, and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) equality. In 1974 congress passes the Education of the Handicapped Act, which required schools to provide mental health services to children with serious emotional disturbances (SED) (Fraser & Lanier, 2006). This protocol was included in the child’s Individual Education Plan (IEP) and helped them gain additional resources in the school setting (Fraser & Lanier, 2006). Prior to residential treatment, Neveah attended a public school and had an IEP.
A statement by Congressman Jarred Polis of 2nd District of Colorado, “Equality before the law is an American value articulated in our Constitution.” However, LGBT people today are still being treated unfairly because they tend to be different. Congressman Polis is said to be strongly committed to ending this discrimination, which is why he came up with the term “Student Non-Discrimination Act.” It is to avoid all kinds of discrimination for the people who are part of LGBT community. It’s been proven that discrimination is a cause for the students to skip school and to harm
In October 12, 2010, Joel Burns made a public message towards the GLBT teens by sharing a personal story. He delivered an amazing message by sharing also those who’ve been victims of being portrayed as gay, bullying, and suicides. Inspiring the young GLBT (Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender) teens that life does not end by the words of others who have an oppose mentality. Life does get better once you graduate high school, adventure throughout your adult life, finding someone you may last a lifetime, and building a foundation just like those individuals who singled you out for having different interest. “...that the things would get easier, please stick around, society will change, please live long enough to see it…”
Mainly driven by conservative religious beliefs, some parents, school administrators, and politicians have opposed these organizations. GSAs have been protected from legal actions due to the Equal Access Act and the United States Constitution’s First Amendment (Mercier, 2009). Nevertheless, some school boards and administrators continue to change policy and legislation using “extreme measures . . . to prevent GSAs from organizing and meeting on school premises reveal[ing] that the deep animus of local communities and school board officials towards gay and lesbian individuals is in fact the driving force behind their actions” (Mercier, 2009, p. 179). The legal attempts to ban GSAs have not hindered the organizations from growing, as they are increasing across the U.S. (Kosciw et al., 2008, 2010; Russell et al.,
Case Analysis: Gay-For-Pay Introduction This case takes place in Wichita, Kansas, a midsize city in the Midwest. Located in Wichita is the Wichita Center for Families (WCF), an agency that provides a variety of services for at-risk families and youths. Alicia Hall is a 25-year-old MSW student from Wichita State University, currently interning within the "youth-at-risk outreach unit" at WCF. Alicia has 2 years of bachelor level case management experience with adults with mental illness and has a passion for the LGBT community.
Over 90% of students who identify themselves as LGBTQ hear discriminating comments on a daily basis at school. People who are from this community have a bigger probability of being victims of hate crimes than any other minority group. This violence is made up of hatred and aggression towards the queer community. Despite personal opinions, everyone deserves to feel safe.
Same-sex marriage has a near even split of people that are for or against it. This split is seen clearly in the Obergefell v. Hodges case in the U.S. Supreme Court, where the decision was 5 to 4. The majority in this case chose to legalize same-sex marriage in all 50 states. This decision brought a lot of controversy from the U.S. citizens, and the controversy came from the question if the Supreme Court decision in Obergefell was the correct decision for America. The answer is no.
The cultural war between majority and minority has been an ongoing struggle in America because we believe in Democracy. A government ruled by the people and for the people is tested when minorities and majorities butt heads on social issues. Many times the majority has the political power to influence legislation to the detriment of the minority leaving members of the minority group to seek justice through the court system. This was the case for the LGBT community when they fought against Colorado’s 2nd Amendment which they felt limited their protections as a minority class. Colorado, in 1992, was one of the first states to experience a rising cultural conflict between the LGBT community and religious groups.
In American History we are currently studying the concept of sectionalism. Sectionalism is division within a country based on religious beliefs and interests. In the early to mid 1800’s, sectionalism in America grew as slavery divided the Nation. Slavery was ignored, compromised, and argued about by the states until the conflict drove our country into the Civil War. Although regional differences are not as distinct these days, many issues are currently causing division among the states and people of our country.
Coming into the master’s level counseling program, I was bewildered by the complexities of the various professional associations and the separation of the code of ethics of varying associations and laws created for counselors. Likewise, I needed to familiarize myself with the discordance between the state regulatory laws and statutes in counseling. It is significant to be familiarized with ethical standards and understand the law's differentiation with an emphasis on personal morals and values. It is indispensable to gain knowledge of professional codes by considering Texas law and how the implementation could affect my future professional counseling career.
Additionally, section A of the ACA Code of Ethics (2014) states several appropriate rationales and responsibilities pertaining to professional therapeutic relationships. Section A.1 of the code (2014) establishes duties of a counselor in caring for the welfare of a client; this includes the counselors responsibilities and counseling plans. Section A.4 (2014) discusses beneficence and nonmaleficence duties as well as refraining from personal value imposition. Alternatively, the ACA Code of Ethics (2014), section A.5, clearly prohibits relationships where a counselor cannot remain objective. Lastly, the code details when termination is appropriate (section A.11.c), or inappropriate (section A.11.b); likewise, section A.12 is clear that abandonment is not advantageous or
Counselors must be aware of their ethical and legal obligations when providing counseling services, such as those related to crisis prevention and intervention. This knowledge can guide the counselor in making appropriate decisions to best assist the client. The American Counseling Association Code of Ethics (2014) provides counselors with the core principles of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, justice and fidelity to guide them in decisions making. Furthermore, the following ACA (2014) ethical codes are applicable to crisis counseling: A.1.a. Primary responsibility.
Regular kids get bullied because they might be over weight or they are different then everyone else, these kids receive help as long as they ask for it. Some gay students might not get help because their counselor is against gays and imagine how their lives are going to be with a president who doesn't really accept being different. The counter side of my argument is that the LGBTQ community shouldn't have their own rights. They might say that it would take to much money and time to invest in their happiness.
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Community are a variety of people who belong in the diversified third sex. LGBT Tourism is a segment within the Tourism industry which aims to attract and market locations appealing to the LGBT community. The main objectives of LBGT tourism are; to promote travel services, accommodations and destinations that will fascinate LGBT tourist; propose LGBT-friendly attractions; offering destinations to individuals who wants to travel for socializing with other LGBT people and LGBT travelers who are predominantly focused with cultural and safety issues. What are the preferences of the LGBT Community in determining a tourist attraction? Are they in search for something more specific within the attraction?