Land is the resource on the surface of earth where activities of human and nonhuman creatures happen. As a resource, land plays crucial role for its physical properties and ecosystem function. Major land uses are: Farmland, Cropland, Pasture and grazing, Forestland, Urban land and others. However, considering the nature of human beings land is often overused and abused. Some contemporary land use- problems are: Urban sprawl, which means that the areas of farmland and forest are now urbanized; Resource preservation, where lands that have ecological values are subject to development projects; Land- use regulations, which are effects of public policies used for a certain land use. These regulations often have an unbalanced distribution of costs and benefits, meaning that there are cases when …show more content…
This reflected upon the people by increasing poverty and lowering the wellbeing of the society. However, the Land Act of 1913 did make some improvements, by separating the land among the native people and the whites at that time. 92.7% of the land belonging to the whites, while 7.3% to the native South Africans – still the main and urban areas controlled by the colonial power. After 1970, with a new ideology of neo-liberalism expanding in the worlds, in support of free market and in attempt to lower the gap between social classes, changed the situation. However after the election of the African National Congress (1914) the situation resulted in a strong elite group controlling the land market and operating on its own interests, at the cost of the majority (Greenberg, Land reform and transition in South Africa). This has led to a growing social inequality and resulted in a failed land re-disruption policy. The above demonstrates an overview of land reforms in South Africa. In order to obtain a better
The landowners took advantage of their tenants by overcharging for land and underpaying for the crops. The tenants began falling deeper into debt. They could not leave until they paid off their debt, which was nearly impossible. Although former slaves had been freed, they were still facing many struggles in free life. America’s plan for reconstruction had good intent, but did not give African Americans the equality they deserved.
But when they got their own land, they really became “farmers” this time. In the other way, this policy directly increased the average earnings for every farmer. (Sowards)Also, this policy made farmers felt more confidence for their future life since they have their own land, they don’t need to worried about lost job based on how much they plant, instead, they can concentrate on how to plant crops more productive. Another policy made by the government that helped the progress on American farmers ' individual opportunity on land distribution was the Dawes Act in 1887. The Dawes Act is an act that the government directly took over Indians ' land and divided into allotments for the Indians.("Dawes”)
Special Field Order #15 promised that each newly freed family “shall have a plot of land no more than forty (40) acres of tillable ground, and when it borders on some water channel, with not more than 800 feet of waterfront”(Document #2). This order, that gave land to African Americans, was put in place to help them begin their new lives a freedmen. In spite of this, An Analysis of The Politics Of Land Confiscation and Restriction stated that “Northern business did not want Republicans setting a radical example for redistributing property from the wealthy to the poor… Fearing that the break up of beg southern states would disrupt cotton production, hurt their profits and undercut the national economy, these northern industrialists financiers, and trader were unyielding in their opposition to any kind of Reconstruction land reform” (Document #4). Simply put, rich whites with political power did not want African Americans to have land. This was because if African Americans had land, they would grow food to provide for their families and no one would be left to grow the cotton necessary for business success.
The changes that were seen after the act was put into law included the end of the communal holding of property by the Native Americans. They would fractionated into individual plots of property, which caused more than half of their lands to be sold off. Women were not given any land under this act, and had to be married to receive the full 160 acres offered. While the Act was supposed to help the Indians, many resisted the changes that came with individual property ownership. They thought that becoming ranchers and farmers was distasteful.
Primary Source Analysis- During the time of reconstruction, which was after the civil war, the government passed the 13, 14, and 15th amendment to give African Americas freedom and rights. The 15th amendment gave the former African American slaves the right to vote. Between 1890 and 1906, the "new" south wanted to eliminate this right for the African Americans. Any African American who fought for their rights would be faced with violence known as lynching, murdering of three or more people.
Congress responded to this by creating the first Civil Rights Act. The act made African Americans full-fledged citizens and allowed the government to uphold these rights in the southern states forcibly. These events led to the 15th amendment which granted voting rights to African American men. Freedmen then began to participate and hold offices in Reconstruction policies. During the Grant Admiration in 1869-1877 however, reconstruction was abandoned, and southern whites took over the congress majority.
For example, according to Document E approximately 50,000 acres of land from 1 family, was split between 287 people. This shows that upper class individuals were not the only ones to own land. Now the land was more evenly distributed to people of other social classes. Another example would be the abolishment of Primogeniture (meaning that when the father and owner of an estate dies, the land property goes to the first-born son). The purpose for primogeniture was to keep family estates in one piece and keep the family powerful.
6. The Homestead Act was passed by Abraham Lincoln in 1862. It offered 160 acres of land to settle in the West to settlers; however, there was limited success due to the limited supply of arable land used for farming. Since most of the land was infertile, rocky, dry, and not agriculturally suited, many people competed for land that was near a water source to make farming possible. Many people did take the acres of land in response to land speculation and corruption but instead of living on it, they sold it for a higher cost to gain profit.
There was a lot of violence and killing to keep blacks out of politics. Sharecropping was a way to scam African Americans to farm for you and make them owe you money, so they have to keep working to pay off the debt. The Supreme Court let oppression happen legally, and could deny people the right to vote. The way black people were treated during reconstruction makes it a
The Allotment Act The Dawes Act and its supporters sang a very similar tune to southerners who justified slavery as their patriarchal and christian duty. The Dawes Act allowed the President of the United States to survey the reservations Indians lived on and allot its land to heads of households, single persons over eighteen, and to orphans. This meant that the President went into reservations and redistributed the land, upsetting the system Native Americans had previously. Slave owners of the Antebellum South believed that the Black men and women needed to be enslaved, for they could not function without a patriarchal master. Westerners too saw the Native Americans as inferior, and felt that they had to help the tribal people be free of
Chapter 1: PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 1.1 WHAT IS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT? Property Management is the operation, control and oversight of a residential, commercial and/or industrial property. The property manager acts on behalf of the owner to preserve the value of the property owned. In return for fee or a percentage of the rent brought in from the property, the property manager provides services to the owner for different types of properties including residential and vacation properties, commercial retail spaces and industrial warehouses.
Costs and benefits of proposed policies can be organized into widely distributed and narrowly concentrated. Widely distributed means that the cost and benefits spread to all the citizens and narrowly concentrated means that the cost and benefits only go or affect a small group. One example of an widely distributed cost is the social security tax, which affects everyone in the United States and everyone has to pay the taxes. Other examples are income taxes, high rate of crime, and others. Some of the widely distributed benefits were retirement benefits, clean air, national security, and others.
Sustainable forest management requires three major criteria which are the maintenance of ecological processes within the forest (soil formation, energy flow, biogeochemical cycles (carbon, nutrient and hydrological cycles), maintenance of biodiversity of forest, improving the net social benefits derived from the mixture of forest uses within the constraints by considering the future. Forest provides habitats for more than half of the fauna and flora on the Earth (SCBD, 2001). Forest biome plays an important role in mitigating climate change by serving as carbon sinks (Hassan et al., 2005). Forest land is the most fundamental natural resources which become reduced mainly due to anthropogenic pressures. For proper management of land, it is essential to have information about existing land cover and about the naturalness of the land.
And one of the old solutions for this concern is to increase number of cultivation lands and exploit new fish stocks. But the competition for land from other human activities makes this an increasingly unlikely and costly solution .for example food producers are experiencing grater rivalry for land, water energy and the need to curb the many negative effects of food production on the environment becoming increasingly clear (Tilman et al. ,2001;
The survey states that four out of every ten South Africans believe that apartheid was not wrong in its oppressive actions, as well as one third of white South Africans believing that poverty in South Africa in the present day is not a result of apartheid (Wadvalla, 2013). Seeing that this data was gathered twenty years apart the first democratic election in South Africa,