Because linguistics is a relatively new science, most of what linguists have learnt about language over the past six decades or so has rarely been incorporated into the school curriculum or communicated to the general public. This is a rather unfortunate situation since education has a lot to gain from integrating linguistics into the pre-existing language curriculum. Although I will draw mainly on my experience with the English curriculum in the Singapore context in this article, my points can be generalised to the teaching of other first languages in other countries.
There are two extremes in the ways we can teach language. One approach involves explicit instruction about words and the structure of language. The other approach is implicit
…show more content…
Its main focus is on how language is used in actual situations and emphasises the importance of the wider context in studying language. Students learn to use linguistic concepts to analyse language choices in texts and to discuss issues pertaining to the relationship between language and society such as: “How does gender and social class affect the way we speak?”, “What is the role of English as a global language today?” and “How is the Internet changing the English language?”.
However, some of the material taught in this course could easily be infused into the English curriculum at the secondary school level. As I have argued so far, knowledge of language need not be seen as a specialised domain from which only a few students can benefit, and can instead be infused into the first language curriculum to complement it and make it more
…show more content…
One of these is descriptivism, which is an approach to language which tries to describe how language is actually being used, and contrasted against prescriptivism, which aims to prescribe to learners one version of language deemed to be “correct”. The general educated person often believes that there is a “correct” form of language, and that we ought to prevent ourselves from deviating from it and lapsing into “bad, broken English”. This is a result of the lack of active efforts by teachers to promote an honest, value-free approach to the study of language – one which recognises that ‘correctness’ in language is dictated by the norms of actual
In her text, “Cognition, Convention and Certainty,” Patricia Bizzell describes the writing process through both inner-directed and outer-directed theories in order to illustrate that the writing process is infirmed by both student’s natural thought processes and their discourse community She uses her text to explain both theories, and to argue for the implementation of a new pedagogy focused on discourse analysis. First, Bizzell introduces the inner –directed theory, which seeks to discover the writing processes through the universal and fundamental structure of language. Conversely, she explains that the outer-directed theory instead argues that the individual’s discourse community does not teach a generalized form of language but rather the
What she previously thought was “bad” English is merely a language variation, each variation with its own history and culture. Lanehart now believes these variations need to be celebrated and that they don't always need to be corrected. The more Lanehart learned, the more she believed that English can vary as long as we can all understand each other. Lanehart decides she doesn’t want to correct people anymore.
While this particular method avoids all the bloodshed that is
The information and opinions provided in the excerpt “Authority and American Usage” by David Foster Wallace give an understanding of what Standard Written English is and why it is influential. It also sets up what the teaching of SWE in schools means for students. Foster Wallace makes an argument about the Democratic spirit and its connection to grammar and the use of SWE by different people. The main point he tries to make about SWE is that it allows people from different upbringings and backgrounds to come together and speak or converse in a language that is common ground, including the grammar and nuances that come with SWE. He urges that SWE is important to conserve communication between people of different heritages and have effective
Review of Vershawn Young Discussion After reading “Vershawn Ashanti Young: Should Writers Use They Own English?” against Rebecca Wheeler’s “Code-Switch to Teach Standard English (Young 111. Wheeler 108)”. Each paper expresses a different opinion regarding the teaching of English in the classrooms. Each author writes with different agendas, different tones, and different purposes. Each acts upon their beliefs as they perceive them, and as a result are poles apart.
This is simply the most obvious way to address both topics in a clear, concise
This can also be viewed as a de-escalating move for multiple reasons. This being that A),
Tan establishes ethos with this juxtaposition by giving an argument on what her definition of English is, despite what society usually defines it as. Q2. The anecdotes further her
Emergent bilingual students are not helped enough, misread, and evaluated too much in public schools, but with that said, their teachers have an influential role in their educational experiences. Curriculum and Instruction 312 is a basic explanation of the problems and possibilities that are relevant to this student population that continues to increase in size. The course has distinctly focused on community, racial, legislative, and academic matters associated with the education of young emergent bilingual students. It has presented an overview of numerous considerations that influence education and schooling for these students. We have examined concepts pertaining to language use and education, registers and varieties of English, curriculum
Both American versions are guilty of linguistic appropriation by Hill’s definition, as they “use appropriated words and ways of speaking to make claims on a wide range of desirable qualities” , but the motives behind examples like this are unclear and much
Retributive approach This approach might be the oldest theory;
1. What are the two parts of Gleitman’s argument for how children do and do not learn verb meanings? P377 Glietman’s first argument is that verbs are unable to be learned by simply observing the situations where they are used. This is because a lot of verbs refer to coinciding situations, and parents don’t always use a verb when its perceptual links are present. The second argument is that there is enough evidence in a verb’s subcategorization frames to guess it’s meaning fairly closely.
2.0 INTRODUCTION Language development happens both inside the classroom (as part of a formal establishment, school or institute) and outside it. The classroom is generally considered a formal setting, and most other environments informal, with respect to language learning. “In environments where informal language development is adequate, it is possible to regard the formal classroom as supplemental, complementary, facilitating and consolidating”(Van Lier, 1988: 20). For second-language development in such environments the informal settings can be regarded as primary and the formal classroom as ancillary. The L2 lesson then becomes a language arts lesson, focusing on special language skills and cognitive/academic growth, much in the same way
Academic English is important to college and university in academic writing course (Jet Writers Essay Writing Contest 2015). It is required students to reading, speaking and listening, while employing evaluating and sharpen their research and writing skills for college and university environment. At the college and university level is the ever-increasing need for students to focus on language and more specifically, the specialized language found both in substance areas and the Academic Language used in teaching that content. Academic Language as the name implies is importance the kind of writing that we are required to do in college and university. It differs from other kinds of writing such as annotated bibliographies, literature reviews,
The Language Culture and Society programme provides us with strong theoretical and interdisciplinary foundation for the study of a range of educational practices across the human lifespan and in a range of theoretical and methodological perspective is brought to bear on studies that explore the nature of literate practices, democracy and civic engagement and participation in social life. The programme focuses on relationships between education school and the dynamics and changing structures of language, culture, and society. It examines connection between broader, social, cultural, linguistic, historical, aesthetic and political factors in education and the local context in which these issues take place. It has long been recognized that language is an essential and important part of a given culture and that the impact of culture upon a given language is something intrinsic and indispensible. Language is a social phenomenon.