Summary: The Importance Of Leadership

1081 Words5 Pages

Introduction
Leadership is a very important field since it moves the whole world. In other words, it is an essential function of management which can achieve maximum efficiency and organizational goals. Many individuals ask why we should study this field or why this assignment is important. Leadership is not just a position, but it is also a process that dominates the relationships among people and organizations. The success of all nations, business companies, educational institutes and organizations depends mainly on effective leadership. Thus, studying leadership is not a matter of luxury, but it is a very essential field that we should study and strive to do it well. The importance of this report lies in the fact that it provides a new …show more content…

According to the notion of balance as defined by Morrison, "leadership is a balance in effective relationships whether boss with employee, staff with volunteer, or chairman with committee." From the situational prospect, Morrison defines it as "it is situational and it is the art of getting or inspiring people to do something with the focus on people." (3) Mills defined "leadership as a process by which one person influences the thoughts, attitudes, and behaviors of others." In other words, it is a guidance that shows the way in order to achieve the organization 's goals. The leaders ' responsibility is to set the direction for the rest of people who work with him. (2)
(b) The Importance of Leadership:
Without leadership, a group of people who work in an organization become lost and this will result in argument and conflict. In other words, a blank and empty future lay before them. Leadership helps to direct our efforts in the correct direction. It is the key to success and achievement. An effective leadership means encouraging people to achieve goals. (2)
Effective leadership is helpful to all nations. The importance of leadership appears in times of crisis. The success of a business organization depends on effective …show more content…

The first two styles are mainly based on the leader. The last two are based on the group. The fist style is Authoritative. This style is adopted when the leader decides and announces his decisions. In other words, the leader is the only one who makes decisions. This style is suitable for political leaders. The authoritative leader is seen as an expert in the company, and is able to clearly identify the goals that will lead the organization to success. The second style is the political one which means that a leader decides and sells the decision to the group. Kings and presidents adopt this style of leadership. For instance the leader identifies a problem or goal to be reached. He considers alternative solutions, selects one of them and then reports this decision to his staff. The leader must then “sell” his decision. The third style is evaluative. The leader puts assumptions or presents ideas and invites questions. The fourth style is participative. In this style, the leader presents alternative solutions and the group chooses the most suitable one. The team shares the responsibility for planning the activities that are essential to carry out the decision. The team also shares the responsibility for the results. The last style is Laissez – Faire in which the group presents alternatives and the group selects from one of them. In this style, the leader puts great trust on his group.

Open Document