Indonesia has started to decentralize governments’ affair since the fall of the long reign of President Suharto (1965-1998). During the three decades of –what so called- the New Order Era, Suharto developed a centralized government, both in the governance and the financial system. The reign also adopted a decentralized system, by the adoption of the Law of 5/1974. Nevertheless, the law primarily introduced a uniform system of local government for the whole Indonesian territory and neglected the existence of local systems that had been rooted in the society. As a result, local governments did not actively involve in development of programs and policies. This fact was mainly caused by the role of the central government holding all the political and economic resources. In 1999, the People Representative Assembly (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat-DPR) passed a set of crucial law i.e. No. 22/1999 on Decentralization of Local Government and Law No. 25/1999 on Fiscal Balance between the Central and Local governments. The implementation of these laws, on the 1st January 2001 marked the beginning of a …show more content…
23/2014 on Local Government which is still applicable in the present time. Compare to the previous laws, the law reduces the power of the local governments by introducing several measures for better decentralization, so that the governance of the public sectors can be more effective. The measures have three aims; the first is stressing on the presence of the state by regulating the law as the national authority and a central power. The second measure is to strengthen the position of the governor as the national government’s representative in providing guidance and oversight over the regencies and municipalities. The last measure is to introduce administrative penalties the local governments up to the dismissal of the regional head for a number of violations which against the national
US Constitution Longevity The United States Constitution is not just a document. It is an omnipresent artifact of the past and ongoing history for the nation it governs. Passionate arguments were abundant during the drafting of the document on what it should entail and what should be left to interpretation. The Constitution not only served to appease many people at the time of its ratification, but it stays standing as a thriving and dependable document capable of change to serve the people as they see fit.
Following the American Revolution, colonists faced the issue of creating a new form of government and order for their newly created country. Delegates from each state, excluding Rhode Island, met in Philidelphia in 1787 to draft the document that would come to be known as the Constitution. Representatives made it their purpose to create a government that would be fair for everyone; the North and South, the educated and uneducated, the rich and poor. After a closer examination of the Articles of Confederation, delegates disregarded the Articles, following the failure of their original form of government. The Articles of Confederation was thought of as a failure after Shay’s Rebellion; an act of dissent by Daniel Shay in which farmers lost their
The 17th Amendment of the Constitution once it was ratified by a majority of states in 1913 changed the way Senators were elected in the voting process. Prior to the ratification of the amendment, the founding fathers saw it fit that the state legislators be invested with the authority to assign states their chosen Senators. The debate on whether the amendment was significant or not has been argued on among scholars and critics alike. One can say the fact that a debate exists at all answers that question itself. The hysteria behind the attachment of the 17th amendment is that it sets precedent for future changes to laws concerning the balance of power between the states and our central government established by the countries Founding Fathers.
In the year of 1865, the 13th Amendment was passed by Congress. This Amendment formally abolished slavery within the United states. This ratification was the final consent to considering the Three-Fifths compromise obsolete; A compromise that was relevant for many years reforming the idea of how the slave count should be considered into the population of the United States. Not only did this Amendment shatter the idea of giving slave three-fifths of a count toward the population, this was the first formal movement towards giving slaves an identity.
The British caused the colonists to break free from them, which was the right thing to do. First it was unnaceary for the British to impose taxes on the colonists. Also the british acts that included townshed act, quartering act, stamp act, and sugar act violated natural rights of the colonists. Lastly the british cut off trade from the colonists. The patriots had the right to declare a war on England and become independent.
Far too long in this great country of ours have the big corporations taken advantage of the people at the bottom. Unfortunately, because of our laissez-faire oriented feelings this leaves millions of Americans who need to rely on government programs in order to survive. With this in mind the 28th Amendment will tackle the problem of big corporations head on with as little government intervention as possible. This Amendment will be composed of three parts initially the first two focused completely on the corporations themselves while the last part will deal with the individual so that he/
In the late 1700’s, James Madison wrote the first Ten Amendments that are listed in the United States Constitution. The Bill of Rights were written to ensure American citizens that they have freedoms and rights that the government can 't infringe. Out of the Ten Amendments, I believe that the First and Eighth Amendment are the most significant. The First Amendment grants us freedom of speech, religion, press, petition, and for people to assemble peaceably.
The Emancipation Proclamation was a presidential proclamation and executive order issued by President Abraham Lincoln on January 1, 1863. This one proclamation changed the federal legal status of about than 3 million enslaved people. In the designated areas of the South from the cages of slavery to the gates of freedom. It had an effect that as soon as a slave escaped the control of the Confederate government, by running away or through the help of federal troops, the slave will become legally free. Eventually it reached and freed all of the designated slaves.
The new constitution, a document granting the framework for a new democratic government, replacing the Articles of the Confederation. This new document gained approval from some of the citizens, but also raised questions and concerns from others. There was a constant back and forth between the two groups on whether or not the constitution should be ratified. This editorial provides historical background on the issue and expresses my opinion on which side I would’ve chosen.
The second amendment states that people have a right to bear arms under a well-regulated militia. This amendment was added to the Bill of Rights because the Americans had just finished fighting The American Revolution with the British government for independence-- Gun control by the British was one of the catalysts of this war. With the revolution fresh in mind, the Americans had registered that there was a need to unite and form a union; however, some Americans felt that a union could result in something similar to the tyranny that the British had imposed on them. They were hesitant of placing the power on a small handful of people-- The second amendment helped take some power from the government and give it to the people.
writing prompt #6: Explain why the media has been called the fourth branch of government. Include your opinion of whether this is an accurate portrayal. Media is considered the fourth branch of government, but why? Media influences lives on the daily and can influence governmental thoughts, opinions , and decisions as well. Because of this it could be used for or against the government.
Mini-Q Essay Do you like when someone thinks they have all power over everything? Well neither did James Madison. This essay is about tyranny and what Madison did to keep this from happening. Tyranny is when one person or group has all the power.
DBQ Essay The United States Constitution is a document that or founding fathers made in order to replace the failing Articles of Confederation (A of C). Under the Constitution, the current government and states don’t have the problems they faced when the A of C was in action. The Constitution was created in 1788, and held an idea that the whole nation was nervous about. This idea was a strong national government, and the Federalist assured the people that this new government would work. The framers of the Constitution decided to give more power to the Federal government rather than the state governments because the A of C had many problems, there was a need for the layout of new government, rights, and laws, and there was a need for the Federal
Local governments are most favorable by citizens because the easy access and control by people who are involved. You can call local government official in general and may personally know them. Local government is the most common government exist in the society. Definition for local government is a form of public administration which in a majority of contexts exists as the lowest tier of administration within a given state. Local government’s objective is to effectually use of land to product robust and complex ecosystems.
Interactions amid the provinces and the federal government, from constitutional issues to the most irresistible topics bang up-to-date in the country, are indemnified beneath the umbrella of “Federalism”. Authorities are shared so that on some matters, the state governments are decision-holders, whereas on the other matters, national government grasps the autonomy. In last twenty-five years, the upsurge of federal fiats on both governments, local and state, has shifted the power amongst state and national governments. Now, the national government is beginning to have more governance over the state’s engagements.