If nuclear weapons were ever used again it could wipe out all of humanity. The United States created the first nuclear weapon in 1945, and with those nuclear weapons they bombed two Japanese cities called Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Nuclear Weapons should be banned, Countries should not have weapons that could wipe out the civilization.
Nuclear weapons pose a direct threat to everyone. They cause distrust among nations and they are useless in addressing any of today 's real security threats. There have been many incidents in which nuclear weapons were almost launched because of accidents and miscalculations. Many nuclear weapons have been taken apart and scrapped. Some countries got rid of them all together, but many countries still maintain their weapons.
Nuclear weapons are bad for the environment Nuclear weapons have the capacity to destroy all complex life forms on Earth and its the only device ever created to do that. If only 0.1% of all nuclear weapon explosive would cause widespread famine and a agricultural collapse. Nations can control their weapons and would only use them to go to war. They can use them whenever they want and it 's all up to the government to use them. They don 't have to ask the people if they have to use them, they will just launch them whenever …show more content…
Most nations equipped with nuclear weapons claim that they rely on them for strategic defense, and they are vulnerable to various attacks without these destructive weapons. Even with the high risk of destruction and devastation, they would prefer to keep nuclear bombs active and ready to go when necessary. Scrapping nuclear weapons would work to a nation’s disadvantage because various hostile states are covertly acquiring nuclear weapons in large number. If they dismantle nuclear bombs, they will be vulnerable to attacks (Matsui). The United States has many pacts that say if countries get rid of some of their weapons they will get rid of some of there
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
The USSR is an ever growing threat to world peace. After the war, they may simply replace Nazi Germany as the new tyrannical power in the world. This bomb, however, would dissuade them. President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a necessary evil.
The United States initiated the Arms race when NATO signed an agreement saying “They agree that if such an armed attack occurs, each of them will assist the party or parties so attacked.” The United States agreed to using armed forces only if the Soviets were to attack. But the Soviets wouldn’t have any nuclear weapons if the United States didn’t keep the secret of the first nuclear bombs they had. That was the start of the Arms race and planning attacks after attacks is the product of keeping the
“A world without nuclear weapons would be less stable and more dangerous for all of us” (brainyquote.com). - Margaret Thatcher. The atomic bomb is “a bomb whose potency is derived from nuclear fission of atoms of fissionable material with the consequent conversion of part of their mass into energy” (dictionary.com). During the end of World War II, the American made 2 atomic bombs to dropped on Japan. On August 6, 1945, an American B-29 bomber dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan.
Throughout the years of 1945 and 1991, the U.S. and the Soviet Union were involved in what is today is identified as the Cold War. During this dark time many lived in fear due to the newest weapon that would be used in war, nuclear weapons. These weapons caused fear throughout the whole world because of their capability to kill thousands with just one. Today many debate over the abolition of nuclear weapons in the United States. Some argue that the U.S. should abolish nuclear weapons, while others say nuclear weapons should not be abolished in the United States.
In the debate “Nuclear Weapons is the best invention ever made”, it is stated that, “The only time that nuclear weapons have ever seriously been used was back in WWII against Japan” (Article 2). The bombs were dropped on two of Japan's major cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which were both centers of military production and transportation. The destruction of these cities had a profound impact on Japan's ability to continue the war, as it disrupted the country's ability to produce weapons and supplies. The bombing also sent a clear message to Japan and the rest of the world that the United States possessed a devastating new weapon and was willing to use it. This served to deter other countries from pursuing nuclear weapons and helped to establish the United States as a dominant military power in the post-war
Yes, the Atomic bomb was tragic and had a lot of sorrow and loss but should be seen as something that prevented world havoc and caused even more destruction than what was already occurring. It also gives the countries that do have nuclear weapons a sense of security if a war were to break out since they can be used to defend their country or better yet end future wars all together. Also they have the highest form of national defense, nuclear weapons serve as a deterrence against all possible enemies. For more than 50
Omar Bradley spoken once that, “If we continue to develop our technology without wisdom or prudence, our servant may prove to be our executioner.” In the 1950’s, Ray Bradbury writes a stories about how technology could change the future. Ray Bradbury is a fantasy and horror author because at a young age he was interested in adventurous and fantasy fiction books. Which connects to the story called “There Will Come Soft Rains,” by Ray Bradbury and shows the truth of technology. Hence fourth, technology has harmed society.
In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.
President Harry Truman gave an executive order in 1945 to drop to atomic bombs in popular downtown cities in Japan. With the guidance of many scientists and political leaders President Truman made the extremely tough decision to drop the bombs. After listening to arguments from both sides President Truman came to the conclusion that dropping bombs would be the best thing to do for this war. It would also show that the United States had an extreme military power. Many American politicians were for the idea of dropping the bomb, because they believed that it was the only way to end the war and get Japan to surrender.
Theoretically of course, what if a country was to develop a weapon strong enough to completely disintegrate cities and all the people living in it? Coincidently, the United states discovered a bomb that did exactly that and ended up thrusting the world into a new era of weaponized technology towards the end of World War II. Countries from this point on became wary of opposing the United States, aware of the power they possessed, especially since the US had already used this weapon on Japan to end the war.
With all the recent political nonsense that's been going on, there is been a lot of speculation regarding just what kind of horrible future the world is headed towards. Will we really live in a dystopian society like George Orwell presented in his novel in 1984. In my opinion, probably not But where's the fun in that? With all the talk of Russian medelling in the recent U.S. Presidential election Tension between nuclear powers is brewing.
Tepperman acknowledges President Obama’s and others’ concerns regarding the danger of nuclear weapons and the president’s efforts to eliminate nuclear weapons. Tepperman counters the assumption that nuclear weapons will be a danger to the world by stating that they will be a constraint for future wars, and he also points out that a nuclear free world is impossible and maybe unwanted. Tepperman proves his idea from observations that shows nuclear weapons haven’t been used since World War II and that war between two states that possess them is unprecedented. The reason, he argues, is that nuclear weapons will substantially increase the cost of war, which will deter nuclear powers from clashing with each other. He provides multiple examples of
Nuclear energy may be the solution that eliminates our concern for energy production in the future, but it still remains a huge issue for the environment. Despite its wide use in many developed countries, nuclear energy poses many threats to both the
One cannot deny that some nuclear waste is produced and that it is radioactive. However, according to the World Nuclear Association in many countries, nuclear waste accounts for just 1% of all toxic wastes. This means that only a small amount of waste is produced and it would be easy to contain. Furthermore, the BBC states that you are able to reprocess nuclear waste and reuse up to 97% of it. This means that waste can be reduced even further and that that supplies of Uranium can be sustained for longer.