In March Madness, the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) make an extreme amount of money, but colleges didn’t put in any work, the athletes did. People who disagree think that they shouldn't be paid because they get a free scholarship, but it is arguably since a scholarship is not what you the only thing needed to survive.
It's all about what you can do for them. Indeed, these scholarships pay for tuition, room and board, and books, but these athletes don't have money for other necessities. These students still live a college life, they go out with their friends, they go to the bars, they buy new clothes, these scholarships do not pay for those items. The argument can be made that the average college student that does not receive a scholarship, also may not the ability to buy these items, so why do the athletes get this special privilege? My main point on that question could be that these average students are not put on display on a daily basis, these athletes or put on television or the radio, and they make the NCAA and their respected schools money every time they pay the game.
The pro athletes get paid for their hard work why don't college athletes?College do as much hard work as the pros but they still do not get paid.They both compete for championships and practice almost everyday.College athletes have to wait to go to the pros to get money when they should get it now.College athletes work on their sport everyday like a job so you should get money in exchange for your work and labor. Athletes need to be healthy but how can they do that without the right food which cost money.Athletes can't keep up with sports if they are not healthy.College athletes also won't have any time getting a job because of all their training and studying.Athletes have gym too which also cost money.most colleges do not require gyms so they do not have them.Without these things athletes will begin to stop being healthy and break down during practice. If all the
The million dollar question; should college athletes be paid? This is an immense debate, but if you were to ask me, I would say yes, college athletes should be paid. There are a plethora of reasons why college athletes should get paid. College athletes should get paid because of the amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school. There are a myriad of reasons that people can argue the opposite way, but, the reasons they should get paid definitely outweigh the reasons they shouldn’t get paid.
That is exactly what this argument is. Many people for the free higher education argue that families can’t take the financial strain that paying for college has on the family. Families tend to end up searching and scrounging up money from miscellaneous places when it comes time to pay for college for their children. Some even have to send their children out into the workforce without any higher education just so that way they can afford a higher education (Jeje). Many families end up stressing over saving enough to pay for college for their children that they become obsessed with it.
Should college athletes be paid? I think they should. I found three main reason why other people and myself think that college athletes deserve pay. One, you can just pay the sports that produce the most revenue. Two, these student athletes put in lots of work and even sometimes have to miss class to go to the sports event.
However, college tuition is not very affordable and is increasing every year. A free college tuition is definitely necessary for students because some are paying for college themselves, the college workload is stressful enough, and scholarships, grants, and financial aid doesn’t cover all costs. College tuition should be free because it would create positive changes for people attending college, universities, and the economy. First, most students are paying for their own tuition themselves because either they want to be independent and do so, or because their parents have made that decision for them. According to Newberry, the average cost a year of undergraduate studies at a private university now tops $21,000.
Colleges simply do not have a lot of money, so they can not afford to have sports. However, this writer 's take on the money issue is that, the institution has to find a way to make money, even if that means charging a fee in the tuition. The college has to give every chance they can for the student to be successful. The college gives the theatre student a chance to go on to further their dreams, they should do the same with athletics. Now, this writer knows that it cost more money to build a football field and have equipment for the players than to build a theatre.
The biggest difference between both is how they get treated very differently. In professional basketball all the players get paid to play but, in college they do not get paid a single dime. This is a huge problem because they both make tons of money for their teams, from selling tickets to selling merchandise a lot of fans want to show their support for their favorite team. Because college players don’t get paid, they often don’t have money to provide for their needs. One quote from Shabazz Napier who is a college player seemed to be disturbing as he said “Sometimes there’s hungry nights where I’m not able to eat, but I still got to play up to my capabilities.” Because of this many people feel college players should get paid because they have no job yet, they are making tons of money for their school.
Although one might say attending college is a good thing, it can also be a bad thing. Parents can be proud of their kids for going to college, but some think college is not worth the time and benefits. Parents work really hard for this money and what happens if the student fails and drop out from college. What happens if you don’t do well in college and you don’t get a degree. Some parents think earning a college degree is useless especially if they are paying for your tuition.
Athletes often can’t.” This shows that students who come from poor families can’t work after classes even if they wanted to because of practice. The article, “Should College Athletes Be Paid to Play?” also states that, “Some Division I athletes came from
Many believe it is absurd to still consider the NCAA amateur sports after all it has become but just as many think the exact opposite and that college athletes already receive fair compensation for their participation. This is a big decision that could impact the lives of thousands nationwide and revolutionize sports as we know it. College athletes should not be paid because of the many benefits that come with being a student athlete and because it is not a realistic resolution. One reason college athletes should not be paid is because of the many benefits there already are to playing a collegiate sport. One being reduced or free admission also known as a scholarship.
I personlly think NCAA athletes should get paid, because they put a lot on the line to play college ball. Yea they might get paid in free education but you got to look on the other side how are they to support they self for personal needs like tooth paste, cloths, shoes, soap, and many more. What about the ones that go out of there home state and play. Their family many miles away so they can’t get to much support from them. Other sports fans do not want to see athletes paid because they say “ it will destroy their notion of amateur athletics.” They stick with the belief that a “free education” is compensation enough for what the athletes provide for the school.
College athletics are an exciting experience for many. Student athletes put in time and work to prepare for game day while fans anticipate to watch from the stands or their TVs. In the article, "College Athletes Should Be Paid," by Ann Kaufmann, she argues that student athletes should be paid because they are so profitable, yet they don 't receive a dime of what they make for their college. But these students are just that, students. Since these athletes receive athletic scholarships, are not professionals, and pose a threat to other school programs to be paid, should they really receive a salary for what they
Have you ever thought about how those hardworking college athletes get through their years attending their University? Well, what if I told you that those athletes can barely get the essentials needed day by day because the scholarships they have received do not cover it and they don 't have any other money to buy it themselves. The debate whether or not College athletes should be paid for their time at the university they attend has been talked about a lot in these past years.Some people think that they should not be paid, but today I’m going to be telling you about why they should be paid. Athletes that are very well known by the fans of the university and or with lots of other people around the world like Lonzo Ball of UCLA, Dillon Brooks of Oregon, Markelle Fultz of Washington, etc. draw in a big crowd which also brings in more money that people pay to watch.