Comparison Of Plato And Platonism

1166 Words5 Pages

Introduction:
More than 24 hundred years ago Plato though people that every human being is seeking to reach for a higher, purer and a more spiritual truth that will illuminate lives and essentially transform the entire world. The researcher will examinat and analyse Plato and Platonism and how it still is relevant to the twenty first century.

Findings
Platon grew up in an aristocratic environment in Athens that was ruled by the thirty tyrants at this time. Unlike previous philosophers, all scriptures of Plato are preserved. This has also been a contributing factor to Platon's advanced position in philosophy history.

The unusual about these writings is that they are written as dialogues, where philosophical questions are discussed between two or more combatants. The books are written in …show more content…

Although his idol (some indicate that in his last years, Plato partially rejected this), his political visions or his cosmological theories have not gained any significant practical impact, his philosophical legacy has gained immense influence.

Analysis
One of Plato’s biggest legacy and the gift he left for the world is the idea of democracy and the way to rule a government. Plato did not want to be identified as being for democracy. His faith in the Athenian democracy disappeared when his teacher Socrates was sentenced to death. Plato believes that in a democratic city state there is no responsibility or obligation. Slaves should have the same freedom as their owners, men and women are should be equal. Freedom is abound. There is freedom of expression and the freedom to do what you want.

The fundamental error of democracy, according to Plato, is that it ignores people's differences. It makes no demands, and ignores the need for education. Democracy creates bad people. Platon considered it more important that the people who govern a city state have knowledge and education than that of the city state being

Open Document