In conclusion killing grizzly bears should not be allowed. This paper has shown you how hunting these animals does no good. Grizzly bears help provide food for other animals, by dragging the fish into the woods and letting other animals feed on its corpse. Another reason is that because of big game hunters grizzly bears are going extinct and hunters are not helping with this problem. This is why grizzly bears should not be hunted and instead help them to gain population in order to keep the ecosystem in a natural flowing
Why do you believe Orwell shot the elephant? Cite passages from the essay to support your belief? In Shooting An Elephant, by George Orwell, the narrator talks about an event in his past in which he shoots an elephant. He was working as the sub-divisional police officer of Moulmein, but was not looked as much of an authority figure.
In addition, the detrimental wildlife issues that would emerge if hunting were no longer an option to keep animal populations under control would increase significantly. The idea of keeping hunting alive is crucial to keep our wildlife safe. Hunting may not apply to all people in the world, but it has to be done. In today’s world there is no other possible way to manage our wildlife in such an effective manner as we do it now. What people need to realize and accept is the fact that hunting does not harm the animals as severely as leaving them to overpopulate does.
Orwell is told that the elephant has been seen destroying the village and even killing a man that Orwell meets up with later. The elephant’s destruction on the village represents imperialism destruction -- rampaging through the streets, knocking over food shelves, and invading people’s properties. Once the officer finds the elephant, he tells the readers, “As soon as I saw the elephant I knew with perfect certainty that I ought not to shoot him” (3). The author provides insight to his moral beliefs on how shooting the elephant is immoral and remorseful. Orwell made it clear to the reader which side he wants to be on, which in this case is the elephant’s side.
He only resorted to hunting humans because he was bored with the regular styles of hunting. There was no more thrill in hunting for him, so he tried to find a new challenge for himself. Advancing with this topic, Zaroff could have done a variety of different things to replace hunting to give himself that thrill. For example, he could challenge himself with different styles or methods of hunting.
Overall it is clear that although people believe the owners of their dogs should get fined or even jail time for the actions of their dogs ', but that should not always be the case. The owners should not get arrested for the actions of their dogs for two main reasons. First, they cannot control their dogs every move, but most importantly dogs have a mind of their own and as much as we try to control them they do not always listen to their masters every command. After learning information the commonwealth’s Attorney; the Grayson County Sheriff’s Office is going to charges the two babysitter’s with felony homicide also known as second-degree murder (Babysitters Charged). Even though we cannot prevent every dog attack that does not mean the owners should always get a heavy penalty because some of the owners actually try to contain the dog in its place.
Do you have a gun in your household? Should people carry guns with them? Michael Steele once said,”You can have all the gun control laws in the country, but if you don 't enforce them, people are going to find a way to protect themselves. We need to recognize that bad people are doing bad things with these weapons. It 's not the law-abiding citizens, it 's not the person who uses it as a hobby.
If a person desires to rob a store or murder someone, he or she is not going to be worried about breaking a gun ordinance. Handgun bans remove an extremely valuable self-defense method from citizens. If guns are banned in the United States, then what will happen if someone breaks into your home? Most likely they will have a weapon, and if you call the police, they will already had a chance to kill you and taken all of your possessions by time the cops come. The best solution would be to defend yourself with a gun, but if this gun control law passes, if you shoot the burglar, you will probably be framed rather than the actual criminal because you had a gun and the thief did not.
The cause for the drop in elephants is poachers killing them for their tusks. The effect is less elephants in the world. If there are less elephants what will people see on safari trips. Poachers are very bad because they kill elephants. Poachers need to just get a real job.
The Dinka and Nuer tribes have both been affected negatively by guns. The use of guns by these tribes has changed their beliefs, respect, and way of life. In the excerpt it says "Children, women and the elderly used to be off-limits during raids..." then later on it shows how the tribes start to kill the women and children. It also says " 'They believe, 'The ghost of the deceased will not haunt me, because I did not kill with a spear, '". Finally it also says " He found armed youths running roughshod in a society whose dysfunction paralleled that of inner cities 8,000 miles away..."
Some people say the age of hunting is over, but many people still hunt. People hunt for food or sport. It is true that most people do not need to hunt for food, but hunting is a sport that many still enjoy. Sure, there are other types of hunting that don’t use firearms, but are you really going to try to trap a deer in a cage? Self-defense is one of the most important reasons to own a firearm, because the crime rates in America are soaring.
Therefore, if that argument does not make sense Ivins, she would naturally support the banning of guns because “[g]uns do kill” (215). By outright banning guns, this may result in the creation of a black market for guns. Since guns would be illegal, more people would resort to underhanded methods of obtaining firearms. This is similar to what happened when there was a prohibition of the sale, transportation, and manufacturing of alcohol across the nation. During this prohibition, places became dangerous because gangs were at war as a result of trying to remain in control of alcohol smuggling operations.
This is a good rule but only in some situations, because if this rule is in place and someone is allowed to have a weapon then they couldn’t do anything also if this was in place it would be much harder to do things like hunting and other gun sports. Beginning with, A lot of people own guns. In an article on mcpl there was an article about
Also, guns could accidentally go off if it is in the student backpack and it dropped and could hurt someone. According to Admiral William H. McRaven a Texas Chancellor, “We survivors do not think that it is a good idea to have guns on campus. There is no evidence that a bill like SB 11 would do anything to stop a mass shooting, but SB 11 would make the average day on campus more dangerous in an environment where students are dealing with failing grades, alcohol abuse, relationship problems” (McRaven). People should think about the future on how many people lives are taken because of guns on campus and should decrease the