ipl-logo

Essay On Mankind's Natural Condition

1623 Words7 Pages

Does reflecting on mankind’s natural condition help us to understand the circumstances under which political authority is justified?

Introduction
This essay is intended to raise analytical arguments, critics and understanding on if, political authority is justifiable under the circumstances of mankind’s natural condition. By mankind’s natural condition we mean ‘state of nature’. A look at Hobbes’ theories will be empirical in analysing the relevant arguments.

Irrational vs. Rational (how can this effect or contribute to a political authority under the circumstance of mankind’s natural condition)
Political authority sets rules of which all follow and obey. Without this kind of entity people will be in the state of nature. Hobbes argues, that in the state of nature people are irrational and self-interested, being irrational will be chaotic according to Hobbes. Hobbes considered people to be like machines that needs an operator in that without an absolute operator machines seize to function or serve their purpose as they are meant to be. “Men are continually in competition for honour and dignity, which these creatures are not”. (Hobbes, 1996[1651])

Since people put …show more content…

“Locke viewed society on a scale from subjugation to personal freedom and declared personal freedom to be the ideal. Hobbes feared anarchy” (Hillman, 2009, p. 2). But Like Hobbes, Locke agrees to a political authority but, he differs from Hobbes’ kind of political authority. If mankind’s natural condition in this circumstance is to reflect a justifiable political authority, Locke believes that, political authority, has to come from people, since mankind is rational and able to make decision based on his eternal morals, and the realities of alienable rights. Thus, "Freedom of Men under Government is, to have a standing Rule to live by" or, if in a state of nature, to be governed by "the Law of Nature". (Farr, 2008, p.

Show More
Related

  • Compare And Contrast Locke And Hobbes

    110 Words  | 1 Pages

    DeAndre’ Royster Simple,and Exclusive The natural state of mankind before forming a government. Hobbes and Locke both believed in a state of nature. They also both believed in a social contract. Hobbes wanted a government to protect people from each other.

    Read More

  • Hobbes Locke Dbq

    789 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hobbes and locke were two philosophers who two different ideas on the world and human behavior as a whole. Hobbes mainly believed that without any form of government people will always be trying to fight for power. On the other hand, Locke believed everyone is born peaceful but can be corrupted by society. Hobbes and Locke both had very different views on different human nature, the purpose of government, and both had a big influence on many different countries.

    Read More

  • Hobbes Natural Power

    1602 Words  | 7 Pages

    In the condition of nature, where man is put at war against man, no security is conceivable and life is brimming with terror. In any case, two common interests empower individuals to get away from the condition of nature; Hobbes’ refers to them as trepidation and reason (pg.108). Angst makes man need to get away from the condition of nature; logic demonstrates to him a method to get away. Reason gives the laws that Hobbes creates, which constitute the establishment for peace.

    Read More

  • Hobbes Vs Locke

    684 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hobbes’s version of the Law of Nature gives human beings the right to self-preservation, even if this means harming others to protect one’s own life. One may argue that there is no definitive way of knowing whether Hobbes or Locke’s account of the state of nature are true as humans have always had some sort of sovereign power above them, never having the opportunity to live in their “natural form”. According to Hobbes, human beings are power hungry as it is power that helps us achieve our objects of desire. He acknowledges that human beings are equal, but this is only as long as we do not desire the same things.

    Read More

  • John Locke's Concept Of Justice

    1751 Words  | 8 Pages

    Locke's most important and influential political writings are contained in his Two Treatises on Government. The first treatise is concerned almost exclusively with refuting the argument that political authority was derived from religious authority. The second treatise contains Locke’s own constructive view of the aims and justification for civil government. According to Locke, the State of Nature, the natural condition of mankind, is a state of perfect and complete liberty to conduct one's life as one best sees fit, free from the interference of others. This does not mean, however, that it is a state of license: one is not free to do anything at all one pleases, or even anything that one judges to be in one’s interest.

    Read More

  • Locke's Second Treatise Of Government And Thomas Hobbes Leviathan

    908 Words  | 4 Pages

    In John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government and Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan, a large topic of discussion is the state of nature. In Leviathan Hobbes has a more negative, but realistic perspective of the state of nature than Locke does in the Second Treatise. Hobbes believes that the state of nature is a “war of every man against every man. ”(34) Locke, however, believes that the state of nature is a “state all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of perfect freedom.

    Read More

  • How Did John Locke Influence The Constitution

    531 Words  | 3 Pages

    “In 1651, Hobbes wrote one of the most influential philosophical treatises in human history, Leviathan or the Matter Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil. Like his rival, John Locke, Hobbes posited that in a state of nature men and women were free to pursue and defend their own interests, which resulted in a state of war in which “the life of man” was “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. ”(“Philosopher who influenced the Founding Fathers and the First Principles,”

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes Views On Human Nature

    392 Words  | 2 Pages

    By continuing to act as citizens of a city or country and taking advantage of the benefits provided, people prove their consent to the government. They may complain, but they stay. Hobbes’s model, however, would force the people to submit to the ruler, even if he made choices they disagreed with. Because he was the law, Hobbes’s sovereign could do no wrong. I do not believe that one person should be able to rule without question. If Hobbes believes that human nature is so evil, why does he allow one evil person to reign unchecked?

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Thomas Hobbes And John Locke

    1441 Words  | 6 Pages

    When comparing the two different accounts of English philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke we must take into consideration a number of things such as the age in which they lived and the time in which they produced their philosophical writings. We will however find out that these two philosophers actually have a couple of things in which agree on even though most of their opinions clash. On one side we have Thomas Hobbes who lived in the time of the English Civil War (1642-1651) who provides a negative framework for his philosophical opinions in his masterpiece Leviathan and who advocates for philosophical absolutism . On the other side we have John Locke, living during the glorious revolution (1688-1689) he presents a positive attitude in his book The Second Treatise of Government and advocates for philosophical and biblical constitutionalism. It is important that we know that the state of nature describes a pre- political society prior to the social contract.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Hobbes And Rousseau

    1351 Words  | 6 Pages

    Hobbes holds that “it is impossible to subjugate a man without first having placed him in the position of being unable to do without another.” Thus, the lack of organizational interdependence in primitive society prevents inequality. Similarly, the lawlessness of early society makes conflict impossible: war “can exist neither in the state of nature, where there is no stable property.”

    Read More

  • Hobbes Lord Of The Flies Quote Analysis

    956 Words  | 4 Pages

    Because he thought that people act in their own selfish interests if they are left alone, Hobbes did not believe that people should be trusted to make their own decisions”(Hobbes). Humans act like this in a state of nature, which is the name for a society that has no government, no rules, and everyone is granted equal power. Hobbes believed that the best government for our unruly and selfish behavior is an absolute monarchy. An absolute monarchy is when one ruler has all the power to make executive decisions. According to him, the people should give up all their rights to the monarch in exchange for

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Hobbes Locke And Rousseau

    1740 Words  | 7 Pages

    Hobbes was an English philosopher, known through out the world as the author of “Leviathan” which is regarded as one of the earliest examples of the social contract theory. His writings were greatly influenced by the

    Read More

  • The Criticism Of Thomas Hobbes Leviathan

    941 Words  | 4 Pages

    He assumes that the primary disposition of human nature is towards the achieving of people’s egoistic needs, towards self-satisfaction; the natural man, is mainly concentrated on his self, the purpose of his actions is only to realise his needs. This exemplifies what another political theorist, Kleinerman calls, “the novelty of Hobbes’s individualism” . He explains that societies idealised by Hobbes are based on the individual human being with his needs and desires, rather than a group of people. Hobbes even states that “so long as a man is in the condition of mere nature (…) private appetite is the measure of good and evil” , clearly giving much importance to the

    Read More

  • Royalism Vs Hobbes

    1783 Words  | 8 Pages

    Such a caveat, indeed promoted aspects of liberalism as it denied the unconditional absolutism of monarchy that had been driven in much of Europe and certainly did not accept that divine monarchy, pushed by the royalists at the time was a legitimate system. Leviathan suggested an uneasy alliance of liberalism and totalitarianism for the securing of peace and stability, which Hobbes saw as the principle condition of freedom and liberty. Hobbes, moved away from royalist thought in other ways as well. While royalists believed that the people should give their absolutely loyalty to a system of sovereignty based on dynasty and primogeniture, Leviathan rejected such principles. Instead, whatever form of absolutely power could provide peace was the best suited solution, whether that be a protector such as Cromwell or a sovereign like Charles II, there was nothing intrinsically good or valuable about Charles II’s family or dynasty that made him fit to rule in Hobbes view.

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes Absolute Monarchy

    1084 Words  | 5 Pages

    Firstly, an absolute monarchy as proposed by Hobbes would require that people relinquish their own rights and to submit to one absolute power, which Locke feels is counterintuitive his understand of humans in the state of nature. A distinctive feature of Locke’s state of nature is perfect freedom for people to carry out their own wills without hindrance. Hence, Locke’s main critique of Hobbes’ absolutism is that people living under a Hobbesian

    Read More

More about Essay On Mankind's Natural Condition

Open Document