ipl-logo

Essay On Polarization

852 Words4 Pages

Political identification can bring a sense of unity amongst other individuals who also align with their political identification. Political polarization refers to cases in which someone’s stance on a given issue, policy, or person is strictly defined by their identification with a particular political party or ideology. Polarization has the potential to threaten our democracy, it doesn’t allow for productive conversations or compromise; something necessary for a healthy democracy. Polarization affects not only congress’s ability to make policy change, but it also creates a political atmosphere constantly in stalemate. While polarization often times isn’t good for a democracy, there are a few ways in which it can also be beneficial to our two-party …show more content…

There are basic foundational principles that are important when it comes to understanding what a successful democracy is – I will provide those some of foundational principles and how polarization can overall threaten our American Democracy. According to Hershey Americans are becoming disinterested in politics and less civically engaged in part because of the hostile political parties. The unengaged citizen poses the greatest threat to our American democracy because citizens who are disinterested are unable to make change. There are other benchmarks that are lay the basic foundation of democracy. According to Greenberg and Page, mention that political liberty and equality are necessary for a democracy to be considered successful (Greenberg and page, pg. 30). Political liberty states that all citizens in a democracy are protected from government; this notion is being threatened. Polarization is threatening political liberty primarily because of laws that allow ideological gerrymandering. With more conservative states getting more conservative and Democratic states becoming more liberal it is allowing voters to sort themselves into more ideologically homogenous districts that it is politicians drawing these lines. The idea of ideological gerrymandering causes polarization on a smaller scale, it then becomes between districts that polarization is

Show More
Related

  • Matthew Yglesias The Case For Partisanship Analysis

    208 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the article, “The Case for Partisanship” by Matthew Yglesias, he explains how in the 1950’s, the American Political Science Association’s Committee strongly presented the idea that polarization is good. Today, many people look down upon political polarization. The mid-20th century appeared united politically but in fact the country was deeply divided over civil rights and politics. Conservatives and liberals could appear in both the Republican and Democratic parties due to foreign policy and racial issues overlapping on traditional conservative and liberal beliefs. The interconnection of political parties in the past has suddenly gone down.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Nancy Maclean's Democracy In Chain

    710 Words  | 3 Pages

    In politics, polarization refers to an instance in which an individual’s stance on a given subject is reflective of their identification with a particular political party or ideology. Through her writing, Maclean’s aim is to slander the “radical right’s plan” to overrule a majority outcome in favor of protecting the minority. A conclusion that is evident through her efforts to capitalize on the American desire for polemical books, provoking her to commit the scholarly misdeed of capitalizing on her audience’s emotion to gain support for her unfair portrayal of Buchanan. Her chief villain is an economist that she argues that although he has not been recognized as a central influence on the libertarian movement, James Buchanan’s politics are centered on early public choice

    Read More

  • Choreography Of American Politics Chapter 1 Summary

    827 Words  | 4 Pages

    This chapter focuses on other possible explanations for increased political polarization and then explain how they don’t account for increased polarizations. The authors give plenty of possible counterarguments for their audience to consider and then show why they are right by shutting those counterarguments down with an overwhelming amount of evidence. They introduce counterarguments like intraparty competition during primaries, partisan congressional reforms, redistricting, and Southern Realignment. Intraparty competition during primaries does not show significant differences in legislators for there to be a solid argument. There are statistics that show that polarization would have been unaltered even without changes in partisan congressional reforms.

    Read More

  • Brian Schaffner's Party Polarization

    768 Words  | 4 Pages

    Thus, the belief that the polarisation of congress must have spawned from an increasingly divided electorate is too simplistic. Fiorina, Abrams and Pope (2006) alternately suggest that rather than ideological divisions increasing within the U.S. population, ideological consistency is increasing on a personal level for voters. This belief is supported by a decrease in split-ticket voting in congressional elections as constituents are now more likely consider their political views to be compatible with those of one specific party. In effect, this would cause conservative Democratic voters and liberal Republican voters to switch their allegiances, the likes of which did occur during the southern realignment that began in the

    Read More

  • Congressional Activity Summary

    813 Words  | 4 Pages

    The differentiators that account for the variation are the parties and Congress. Meinke then deduces from the information that the majority party in Congress exhibits a significant substantial number of members that advertise their partisan activity — “…majority party status—and possibly the strength of the party brand name—is associated with the choice.” (Meinke 860) Meinke also discovers that the stronger the partisan base (measured by same-party presidential vote), there is a more

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Caught In The Middle By Wendell Berry

    859 Words  | 4 Pages

    He also points out differences between liberal and more conservative parties. Through these topics, he informs the reader of his opinions regarding problems in American politics; the equality of people governed and the divide amongst political parties. To begin his discussion, Berry describes how everyone has to pick a side in politics. He discusses the lack of understanding of what it really means to be in a particular party by saying, “It doesn’t matter that neither of these labels signifies much in the way of intellectual

    Read More

  • What Is Party Polarization?

    273 Words  | 2 Pages

    Party polarization is the division between the two major parties on most policy issues, with members of each party is unified around their party’s position with little crossover. The competing explanations for polarization are how congressional representatives are elected, lawmakers selecting a candidate for office and as congressional districts and states have become more homogeneous. Every 10 years, congressional district geographic boundaries are redrawn so that each district has roughly the same population. These districts are increasingly drawn to be safe for one political party or another so that the district has a clear majority of either republicans or Democrats. This process is known as gerrymandering.

    Read More

  • Explain The Strengths Of The Judicial Branch

    1067 Words  | 5 Pages

    One strength of a political party is that they are “essential institutions for the operation of the American government” (Barker, 2016, p. 1, para. 1). One of the functions of the political party is to be the middle person between citizens and “their elected government” (Barker, 2016, p. 4, para. 2) so that the people can feel as if their voices will be heard and the issues will be resolved. Although political parties should be for the people, one of the weaknesses is that “many believe that the major parties do not do an adequate job of

    Read More

  • Culture War The Myth Of A Polarized America Analysis

    519 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the article Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America, Morris Fiorina addresses the issue of the illusion of political polarization. Political polarization is the separation of political beliefs into two separate extremes. The main illustration Fiorina uses is the use the electoral map. The electoral map is used to gauge which party won an election or polling.

    Read More

  • Essay On Sectional Tensions

    734 Words  | 3 Pages

    As the foundations of a successful government system, political parties help keep balance of power and uphold the Democratic ideals of the United States. These parties have origins that can trace back to the early sectional tensions in America. These sectional tensions were the primary reasons for the development and progression of political parties in the United States. As early as 1800, signs of deviation would appear.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Political Parties

    950 Words  | 4 Pages

    Definition Essay Rough Draft Government is an important aspect in today’s world, especially regarding the opposition of being either a republican, democrat, or falling somewhere in between. One may identify them self as being one or the other, but how does one come to the conclusion of being a republican instead of a democrat or vice versa? It all comes down to how a person defines government and different political parties. A person may base his or her political beliefs off of what is said in media or from what one is accustomed to, but various questions and concerns regarding what ideas one supports go into picking the “right” political party.

    Read More

  • How Do Political Parties Influence Congressional Elections

    758 Words  | 4 Pages

    Political Parties serve a crucial role in congressional campaigns, especially for candidate recruitment. One significant role political parties serve is the state law of redistricting, “Because the composition of House districts can make the difference between winning and losing, the two major parties and individual politicians, particularly incumbents, often fight fierce battles in state legislatures over the alignment of districts.” (Smith, et al., 2007). Similar to my previous discussion, the congressional district map is crucial to the success of political parties and gerrymandering is just apart of the nature of political parties. In order for political parties to completely reap the benefits of their constituents, they must draw a map that serves their best interest.

    Read More

  • Calvin Coolidge Reflection

    784 Words  | 4 Pages

    By restraining the influence of the government on daily life, the United States will be able to return to the great nation of freedom; a nation in which its founding fathers so vehemently fought to build. Similarly, politics should not be controlled strictly according to political parties, and Coolidge urged people to support the values they believe in, not a certain political party. In today’s world, I think many politicians would benefit from acting in the way of doing the right thing, rather than supporting sides merely based on political affiliation. For this reason, I am passionate about educating myself as much as possible to candidates beliefs, and I look forward to being able to take part in my first elections in coming

    Read More

  • What Are The Advantages And Disadvantages Of The Two-Party System

    1851 Words  | 8 Pages

    Since the founding of the United States, there have been two main parties. Disagreeing on whether the constitution should be ratified, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton helped in founding the first political parties while serving on George Washington’s cabinet (ushistory.org). Starting with the Federalist and the Democratic-Republican parties, then Democratic Party and the National Republican Party, and then the Democratic and Whig Parties, and finally to the now well-known rivalry between the Democratic and Republican Parties, the two-party system is a long-standing tradition in the United states (Blake). The two-party system definitely has some advantages. It allows for political stability, a smaller pool of candidates for public office, a simplified version of political information, and the representation of multiple political ideals (“9 Advantages and Disadvantages”).

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay About Political Parties

    491 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although it would not become a lawless anarchy, it would become a dull, frail, lifeless government. Without the spark and fire of political parties, America would become lethargic and mundane. As previously stated; political parties are the heart and brain of America’s government. That means without political parties, America's government would become essentially lifeless. With that it can be said that political parties are essential and beneficial to America's government, people, and political

    Read More

More about Essay On Polarization

Open Document