It could be done only on principles of private justice, moral fitness, and public convenience, which, when applied to a new subject, make common law without a precedent ; much more when received and approved by usage. (Willes, J., in Millar v. Taylor 1) People has been able to get the information more quickly and easily by the development of technology, thereby information on anyone’s privacy can now be obtained quickly and easily. In particular, privacy of public figures including celebrities is increasingly deeper day by day, in Korea, there is a weak legal action against that. Legal action for general citizens' privacy is much more vulnerable. Authorized public fihures’ privacy is rapidly spreading through the media and the general public’s …show more content…
Politicians’ role is leading the country on the behalf of for the people. That the public has an interest in their private life is thought as a natural thing compared to a celebrity. But because politicians are also people and citizens of a country, so they have human rights and dignity. One of the examples of the violations of politicians’ privacy is that the media reported ‘a extramarital intercourse’ of Mitterrand (Dr. Son 4), the late French President. In a society which sees ‘a extramarital intercourse’ as a negative gaze, that the president of a country acted such an action could be a problem. But at the point that it doesn’t become the problem when he led the country, it seems to be the infringement of privacy which went to far. Another example can be said about a scandal of the former US President, Clinton (Dr. Son 4). That Clinton did not do an action which the head of the country had to do is also right to be criticised, but if it was really just reported for the right which the public know, the former US President, Clinton experienced the infringement of his privacy. There are very different opinions on the infringement of the politicians’ privacy rather than celebrities. The title of public figure seems to make even more so. But one should not simply claim the rights of citizens to know, is it not that they also should protect their dignity and human
Meanwhile, private figures “are not only more vulnerable to injury than public officials and public figures; they are also more deserving of recovery.” At first I thought that public figures were more vulnerable to scrutiny because of their positions, but after reading the text above, I stood corrected. Public figures, when attacked with false claims, can always go ahead and deny, and sway other people’s beliefs quite quickly; while private figures have it harder. This is because the fewer people who know them, the fewer people who will believe in them.
Merry had access to a client’s confidentially information. We do not know how Merry is going to use the information learned about the prominent public figure. The information Merry had access to can be damaging to the client public image. This affects the well-being of the client. The therapist’s inability to maintain confidentiality affects the beneficence of the client.
The films The Nine Lives of Marion Barry and Anita, contribute to history in allowing us to go back in the past to see how we as a society chose how to handle scandals, which creates certain expectation and set boundaries during the era in which they occurred. With this information, we can then redefine the differences between events in the past and compare them today. For example, Barry was elected into office countless times after countless drug scandals surfaced about his coke addition, yet Anita Hill’s reputation was destroyed after she accused Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment. Many would consider this to be great injustice, resulting in confusion. As a result, the media plays such an important role in helping us understand and in showing how some scandals are very specific to time, place, and culture which is why people react differently to them.
This same publicity is causing the party system that our government is based on to be considered futile to those who follow the president’s celebritism. The parties themselves allow for people to follow people with similar values to them and for the people to elect a candidate to run under that party. People no longer feel the need to use this when they can learn about the people themselves. This also destroys people’s belief in politics. They lose interest in the repetition of similar presidencies and people who want actual politics lose interest in the repetition of the celebritizing rather than the
In the article “ A Leader Is More Than A Messenger” Toni Smith starts out her article by stating how politics are involved in every aspect of our lives, even during sporting events because they are conducted as extravaganzas. Smith uses
Throughout history, many people have been involved in a scandal and the way society shunned them depended on the time period. For example, one of the most scandalous people who lived during the Russian revolution in the 1900s was Grigori Rasputin. Rasputin was a poor peasant, who pretended to be a holy man with powers to heal people. He created his own self-image of being a holy man, when he travel in Greece and Jerusalem. He ended up becoming an important part of the royal family, when he was magically able to stop the Tsar’s hemophilic son from bleeding.
To many, violation of human rights is a serious issue. This shows that for every negative force, there is always someone who recognizes the wrong and seeks to correct
If people are unaware of their rights, they could get cheated out of something important. Being aware makes you a guardian over your own rights. Sometimes, it’s not for the bigger picture, it is on a smaller scale and looking at things for yourself. It is important to know what your propriety, so that you can do what is morally correct for yourself, others, and the nation.
To any uneducated individual, that individual’s right to privacy is as important as his/her right
There have been a lot of different President Scandals. The one with Thomas Jefferson and his slave and when they fell in love with each other and had at least one child, I think that's okay for me. I wouldn't think anything bad about Thomas Jefferson, he just liked her, but I also think that if someone had discovered this when Jefferson was alive, I think they would have killed them or punished him with something. With the Andrew Jackson's one with his girlfriend who became his wife, I think that it's okay with this one, too. Jackson and Rachel just were in love and it was Rachel's choice to run away and marry Jackson
By asking the question after being told not to is undermining 2. Should reporters probe into the personal and sexual lives of public official and politicians? Sports luminaries? Entertainment stars? I reason that reporters should respect privacy no matter a person’s social status, and furthermore if a person is not famous there is no probing into their personals lives.
The JonBenét Ramsey Case: Who Was The Killer? There are more than 211,000 murder cases that have remained unsolved since 1980, but there is a certain one that still haunts America today. This story made it around the whole country and is known to be one of the top ten unsolved crimes in the United States. It has been almost 22 years since the tragedy of JonBenét Ramsey, a sweet little pageant girl who was found murdered in her own home.
Governments invade people’s privacy through many different ways such as spying through technological devices. For example in the novel 1984, government invaded the people’s privacy through the telescreens which left the citizens from Oceania with no privacy. Nowadays, the government invades our privacy through our phones. The privacy violations Americans experience today are similar to the privacy violations in 1984 because the government spy on us through our, Wi-Fi and GPS tracking. What we should take from 1984 is that we are being spied on by the government all time and that they are taking away our right of
Although people decided to live the life famous, they should still receive some type of privacy like everyone else. All the paparazzi following famous people around can cause them to break, which is what the paparazzi wants. There is plenty of information to help prove how much they need their own space like everyone else. In my opinion, famous people and their children need privacy to help them stay sane and happy.
‘Human rights’ are not privileges to be earned or gifts that governments can give or take away at will as they are part of what is means to be human (British Institute of Human Rights 2014). The protection